“一带一路”下区域经贸合作对海洋战略资源安全的传导模型和传导效应

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (649 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The system of regional Land-Sea economic and trade cooperation which interact through the constituent elements can transfer policy content and affect marine strategic resources effectively.It plays important role by depending on economic and trade cooperation and development policies of countries in the region, according to certain conduction procedures and rules.The classic cases are the disputes and cooperation of Malaysia-Thailand, Malaysia-Vietnam in the Thailand Gulf in ASEAN ,United States-Canada and United States-Mexico in NAFTA ,Kuwait-Saudi Arabia’s Neutral Zone etc.With the cases mentioned above, the paper points out that China should pay more attention to the revenue and development of marine strategic resources security, develop on Land-Sea economic and trade cooperation between the disputed countries, strengthen international marine cooperation, cooperate and develop by various forms etc.in the construction of the “The Belt and Road”.

Key words： regional economic and trade cooperation marine strategic resource security conduction model conduction effect Belt and Road Initiative

Received: 02 April 2019

PACS:

F114

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Xiu-lian

Cite this article:

CHEN Xiu-lian. Conduction Model and Effect of Regional Economic and Trade Cooperation on Marine Strategic Resources Security under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. , 2019, 36(3): 25-36.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I3/25

[1] ED Mansfield,BM Pollins.Economic Interdependence and International Conflict[M].USA:University of Michigan Press,2003.286.
[2] Kusuma Snitwongse.Thirty Years of ASEAN:Achievements through Political Cooperation[J].Pacific Review,1998,11(2):183-194.
[3] H Dang.Regional Cooperation in the South China Sea and the Arctic: Lessons to Be Learned?[M].Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2013.171-205.
[4] 郑华芳. 南海问题解决方案研究综述[J].东方企业文化,2012,(1):89-90.
[5] 曾凡传. 新形势下南海问题解决方式的探讨[J].学理论,2011,(35):32-33.
[6] 庞铭辉,敖杏林.经济相互依赖:和平之路抑或冲突之源?—中国与周边国家的实证研究(1981-2007)[J].当代亚太,2016,(3):29.
[7] 陈秀莲,樊兢.中国南海海洋战略资源安全的困境与合作对策[J].世界地理研究,2018,27(2):55-64.
[8] Morrow James D.How Could Trade Affect Conflict[J].Journal of Peace Research, 1999,36(4):481-489.
[9] Snowtwongse K.Thirty Years of ASEAN:Achievements through Political Cooperation[J].Pacific Review,1998,11(2):183-194.
[10] David H, Bearce & Sawa Omori.How Do Commercial Institutions Promote Peace?[J].Journal of Peace Research,2005,42(6):659-678.
[11] 周玉渊. 从东盟自由贸易区到东盟经济共同体:东盟经济一体化再认识[J].当代亚太,2015,(3):92-112.
[12] 东盟共同体昨日建立[N].广州日报,2016-01-01(A10).
[13] 郎平. 区域贸易制度的和平效应分析—来自发展中国家的视角[J].当代亚太,2016,(3):101-125.
[14] 孙广勇. 南海“共同开发”的马泰模式[J].能源,2012,(2):76-77.
[15] 马来西亚和泰国联合管理局第440号法令(1991)[A].杨泽伟.海上共同开发协定汇编[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.230-239.
[16] Thailand —Malaysia Joint Authority Act,B.E.2553[Z].Joint Authority,1990.1-13.
[17] 邵建平,李晨阳.东盟国家处理海域争端的方式及其对解决南海主权争端的启示[J].当代亚太,2010,(4):144-156.
[18] 马来西亚与越南社会主义共和国关于两国大陆架划定区域内石油勘探和开采的谅解备忘录[A]马来西亚与越南社会主义共和国关于两国大陆架划定区域内石油勘探和开采的谅解备忘录[A].杨泽伟.海上共同开发协定汇编[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.313-315.
[19] 罗国强,郭薇.南海共同开发案例研究[J].南洋问题研究,2012,(2):45-55.
[20] 林欣. 北美自由贸易区二十年发展的回顾与展望[J].理论月刊,2015,(9):182-188.
[21] 董映璧.冷眼看北极——环北冰洋各国拉开资源争夺序幕[EB/OL].http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gjss/gdxw/200708/27/t20070827_12689028.shtml.2019-02-18.
[22] 陶凤,杨溪.美加龃龉北冰洋[N].北京商报,2016-03-23.
[23] 徐长安.美加联手禁止北极近海油气活动[EB/OL].http://world.people.com.cn/n1/2016/1221/c1002—28967 006.html.2019-02-20.
[24] 美利坚合众国政府与墨西哥合众国政府关于墨西哥湾西部海湾200海里以外大陆架划界条约[A]美利坚合众国政府与墨西哥合众国政府关于墨西哥湾西部海湾200海里以外大陆架划界条约[A].杨泽伟.海上共同开发协定汇编[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.607-611.
[25] 李越峰编译.科威特的石油储备及石油工业[EB/OL].http://kw.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ztdy/200304/200304000 84721.shtml.2019-02-20.