|
|
|
| Metaphysical Process and Theoretical Interpretation of the Hidden Meaning of Chunqiu |
| ZHANG Jia-zi |
| College of History and Culture, Northeast Normal University,Changchun, Jilin, 130024 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Confucius interpreted “yi (义)” in Chunqiu (The Spring and Autumn Annals) as “liyi (礼义,propriety and righteousness)” and tried to construct a set of theoretical bases to evaluate historical figures and events. The most famous three commentaries on Chunqiu recognize and respect the concept of “righteousness” established by Confucius, and then on its basis make theoretical interpretation and construction and make deeper and detailed interpretation of “yi” embedded in Chunqiu from different perspective. Among them, The Commentary of Zuo (左传)emphasizes “deyi (德义,morality and faith)”,takes “de(morality)” as the basis for historical evaluation,the most important moral quality, and emphasizes its universal significance for historical evaluation. The Commentary of Guliang (谷梁传) values “jingyi (经义, moral principles from Chinese classics)”, focuses on the writing techniques of Chunqiu and the great principles embedded in it, forming a logic construction of “yi”. The Commentary of Gongyang(公羊传), on the basis of DONG Zhong-shu’s “Chuqiu Dayi(春秋大义,Dong felt that Confucius not only recorded events to exercise judgment upon them but also laid down the rules to be used in governing future dynasties）”, interprets the way of integrating “yi” into governance and ruling from the perspective of universal values, which makes the basic theory of centralized politics in Han Dynasty. All these interpretations make Chunqiu not only a historical text that measures success and failure in history, but also a classic on moral codes and social ethos.
|
|
Received: 10 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 春秋左传正义[M]秋左传正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[2] (清)焦循.春秋左传补疏[A].(清)阮元编.皇清经解[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2005.8801.
[3] (明)王夫之.春秋家说[A].船山全书[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1988.263.
[4] 春秋谷梁传注疏[M]秋谷梁传注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[5] 杨树达. 春秋大义述[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2007.52.
[6] 史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[7] 冯友兰. 孔子在中国历史中之地位[A].三松堂全集[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,2000.135-149.
[8] 徐元诰集解.国语集解[M].北京:中华书局,2002.
[9] (清)黄宗羲.明儒学案[M].北京:中华书局,1985.285.
[10] 孟子注疏[M]子注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[11] (南宋)吕大圭. 论夫子作春秋[A].(清)陈梦雷编.古今图书集成[M].北京:中华书局,1985.69769.
[12] 梁启超. 中国历史研究法[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2014.18.
[13] (清)张自超.春秋宗朱辨义总论[A].李淼编.中国古代序跋文选集[M].汕头:汕头大学出版社,1996.658.
[14] (清)顾炎武著,黄汝成集释.日知录集释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.71.
[15] 曹胜高. 义政说的学理建构与学说指向[J].古代文明. 2013,(3):102-111.
[16] (清)戴震撰.经考[A].戴震全书[M].合肥:黄山书社,1994.555.
[17] 曹胜高. 上古礼学的内在结构与逻辑层级[J].河南科技大学学报. 2011,(4):5-13.
[18] [德]阿斯特.诠释学[A].洪汉鼎编.理解与诠释:诠释学经典文选[M].北京:东方出版社,2001.1-22.
[19] 汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.1715.
[20] 曹胜高. 义兵论与秦汉军争的合法性阐释[J].古代文明. 2014,(2):102-111.
[21] 苏舆撰. 春秋繁露义证[M].北京:中华书局,1992. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
