|
|
|
| Why Does Ecological Ethics Need Ecotopia |
| ZHANG Peng-song |
| College of Philosophy, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150080 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The historical evolution from industrial civilization to ecological civilization is not only the transformation of specific forms of politics and economies, but also requires the change of ethics as the enlightenment of ideas and culture. The emergence and development of ecological ethics is to assume the historical mission of this transformation of civilization and play the role of enlightenment and cultural leadership. The current research on ecological ethics often falls into the dilemma of natural centralism and anthropocentrism. An important reason is that it does not face the modern moral values and has not really touched the core issue of “modernity” morality. It is precisely the ideological logic of the “modernity” morality that splits the ecological ethics thought which originally had the overall organic meaning into diametrically opposed natural centralism and anthropocentrism, and loses the realistic demand of the moral rationality and moral practice to protect the nature. At the turning point of civilization, the ecological ethics research requires a utopian perspective. We should, under the guidance of ecological utopian thinking, get out of the ideological trap of “modernity” morality, move towards the ecological ethics of transcendence and integration, and to a certain degree, give full play to the enlightenment value, ideological motivation and practical power of ecological civilization.
|
|
Received: 10 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 吴国盛. 豁出“生存”搞“发展”[J].读书,1999,(2):36-42.
[2] 万俊人. 寻求普世伦理[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.269.
[3] 谌林.生态伦理学的价值与陷阱[N].中国社会科学报,2012-10-22(A04).
[4] 刘福森. 自然中心主义生态伦理观的理论困境[J].中国社会科学,1997,(3):45-53.
[5] 万俊人. 生态伦理学三题[J].求索,2003,(5):149-153.
[6] (英)吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾译.南京:译林出版社,2000.151.
[7] 刘福森,李力新.人道主义,还是自然主义?——为人类中心主义辩护[J].哲学研究,1995,(12):60-65.
[8] 张彭松.生态伦理:从颠覆走向整合[J].自然辩证法研究,2014,(10):108-113.
[9] 余谋昌. 从生态伦理到生态文明[J].马克思主义与现实,2009,(2):112-118.
[10] (德)卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳译.上海:上海人民出版社,1985.77-78.
[11] 朱国芬,郭爱芬.试论生态主义的乌托邦特性及意义[J].南京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(3):95-124. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 35 
