|
|
|
| Fundamental Position of Intellectuality in Aesthetic Taste from the Perspective of Hume and Kant’s Aesthetics |
| SONG Ye |
| Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 102488 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Taste difference is one of the common phenomena in aesthetic activities, and the old saying that “taste is inarguable” has always influenced people’s attitude toward taste difference. Both Hume and Kant did physiological observation of taste difference in aesthetic activities, and they both believed there were correct aesthetic opinions and proper emotional response in aesthetic activities and they were universal among people. Hume took the authoritative opinions of a group of very intellectual connoisseurs as standards to settle differences, while Kant sought evidence for the universal validity of correct aesthetic opinions from the intellectual power deep in reflective judgment. They both emphasized intellectuality was crucial to resolve difference in aesthetic tastes, which highlights the fundamental position of intellectuality in aesthetic tastes, and ultimately reveals us their pursuit of objectivity of intellectuality in aesthetic tastes.
|
|
Received: 10 August 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] （美）门罗·C·比厄斯利.西方美学简史[M].高建平译.北京：北京大学出版社, 2006.156.
[2] 缪灵珠编译. 缪灵珠美学译文集（卷二）[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社.1998.
[3] Ted Cohen, The Philosophy of Taste: Thoughts on the Idea[J].The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics,2004.167-173,167.
[4] （英）休谟.论道德与文学：休谟论说文集（卷二）[M].马万利,张正萍译.杭州：浙江大学出版社,2011.
[5] （英）休谟.道德原则研究[M].曾晓平译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[6] James Shelley. Hume’s double standard of taste[J].Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism,1994,52(4)：437-445.
[7] Jens Kulenkampff.The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant[J].Nous,1990,24(1).
[8] Ted Cohen & Paul Guyer, eds. Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics [C].The University of Chicago Press,1982.
[9] （德）康德.判断力批判[M].李秋零译.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2015.
[10] （美）H·G·布洛克.美学新解[M].腾守尧译.沈阳：辽宁人民出版社,1987.229.
[11] （英）鲍桑葵.美学史[M].张今译.北京：商务印书馆,1985.
[12] Ted Cohen. An Emendation in Kant’s Theory of Taste[J].On the Bicentenary of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judge-ment.Vol.24,No.1,1990.141. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 34 
