|
|
|
| Foreign Jury System and its Implication to China’s Judicial System |
| WANG Ya-ming |
| School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210004 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There are two major modes in jury system: the jury mode and the assessor mode. Each of them is inseparable from its particular cultural tradition and social factors, and influenced by the governance pattern and characteristics of law in the countries in which it is applied. Through ages, the jury mode and the assessor mode have turned from being contradictory to being complementary and integrated with each other. These two modes are quite different in system operation, hearing scope, trial cost, and cultural tradition, which leads to sharp distinction between the two modes and complete difference in the way they operate. China needs to draw on the advantages of the jury mode in the common law system to overcome the drawbacks of the assessor mode: to further define the roles of judges and the jury to avoid the phenomenon that the jury does not play its due role in the trial; to expand the scope of the jurors to promote judicial democracy and justice; to further enrich the types of jury cases; to enforce the right of the concerned people to exercise their choice of jurors to ensure the concerned people are clear about the jurors; to strictly forbid jurors to read case files before the court trial to make the court trial real; to set strict rules for the selection of jurors and to ensure they play their due role in the trial.
|
|
Received: 06 April 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 方金刚，胡夏冰.国民参与审判制度：点评与展望[N].人民法院报，2014-10-31:（5）.
[2] 李红海.英国陪审制转型的历史考察[J].法学评论，2015，（4）：184.
[3] 李昌道，董茂云.陪审制度比较研究[J].比较法研究，2003，（1）.
[4] 高一飞.上帝的声音陪审团法理[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社，2016.
[5] 王涛.陪审制兴衰考[J].中国刑事法杂志，2016，（1）:120.
[6] 胡云红.俄罗斯陪审团制度的重建及其对完善我国人民陪审员制度的启示[J].法律适用，2015，（2）:119.
[7] 左卫民.刑事诉讼的理念[M].北京:法律出版社，1999.70.
[8] 邓宇.法国的陪审制度[N].人民法院报，2014-10-10:(5).
[9] 刘晴，段明学.日本精密司法评述[J].西南师范大学学报（人文科学版），2006，（5）：43.
[10] 周茂雄.日本裁判员制度及对我国陪审制度之借鉴[J].北京政法职业学院学报，2015，（2）:88.
[11] 何勤华.20世纪外国司法制度的变革[M].北京:法律出版社，2003.119.
[12] 高一飞.中美陪审制基本价值的比较——兼论我国新陪审制的出路[J].新疆社会科学，2005，（5）:85.
[13] 施鹏鹏.陪审制研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社，2008.
202.
[14] 顾永忠.以审判为中心背景下的刑事辩护突出问题研究[J].中国法学，2016，（2）：90.
[15] 宋冰.读本：美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社，1998.172-173.
[16] 刘哲玮.人民陪审制的现状与未来[J].中外法学，2008，（3）:439.
[17] [法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神（上册）[M].张雁深译.北京:商务印书馆，1997.7. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 33 
