|
|
Professional Transformation of “First-Class” University Presidents: Their Concerns, Reasons and Patterns |
TONG Feng1, 2, SHENG Chuang-xin2 |
1. College of Marxism, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632; 2. Human Resources Development and Management Office of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632 |
|
|
Abstract Modern universities are known as the “power station” for the development of human society, and university presidents are the engines for the development of universities. There is a limit to the tenure of university presidents but no limit to the development of higher education. The president of a university has a dual identity as a scholar in theory and a profession in practice. Generally speaking, the publication of university presidents during their tenures gives us a glimpse of their management ideas and professional transformation. We make statistical analysis of the number of the papers of the “first-class” university presidents on higher education in CNKI, journals where those papers were published, download times, citation rate and high-frequency words during their tenures. The findings show that they shift from their previous research interests to higher education. Focusing on the high-frequency terms such as double first-class(DFC) program, moral-based practice in education, teaching reform, innovation-oriented country, and construction of undergraduate programs, the presidents of first-class universities usually choose “running the school by experts” mode based on personal charisma. The government, society, universities, and the presidents have jointly promoted the professional transformation of the “first-class” university presidents, from which came their “professional ethics”. This provides an important reference for promoting “double first class” programs and exploring modern university management system.
|
Received: 15 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (美)克拉克·克尔.高等教育不能回避历史——21世纪的问题[M].王承绪译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001. [2] 刘博文,温涛.高校书记校长管理要专业化、职业化[EB/OL].https://www.sohu.com/a/397290164_484992,2020-05-24. [3] 姜朝晖. 美国大学校长职业变迁:一种历史的视角[J].高校教育管理,2010,4(6):4-8. [4] 王丛漫,邹宏美.大学校长职业化历史变迁及其本质特征[J].河北学刊,2015,35(5):204-208. [5] 陈治亚. 关于大学校长职业化的探究与思考[J].中国高等教育,2013,(2):16-18. [6] 宣勇,钟伟军.基于治理能力提升的中国大学校长管理专业化理论建构[J].教育研究,2017,38(10):52-58. [7] 刘启元,叶鹰.文献题录信息挖掘技术方法及其软件SATI的实现——以中外图书情报学为例[J].信息资源管理学报,2012,(1):50-58. [8] Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC.Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis[M].Harvard, MA: analytic technologies,2002.6. [9] (西)奥尔特加·加塞特.大学的使命[M].徐小洲,陈军译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001. [10] 陈宝生.准确把握精髓要义转化形成内在动力推动新时代教育改革发展伟大实践[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-06/12/content_5399467.htm,2020-05-12. [11] 郝平. 以党的十九大精神为指引让中国特色社会主义大学焕发出强大生机与活力[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2017,(10):3-7. [12] 刘伟. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义高等教育思想研究[J].中国高教研究,2018,(4):1-4. [13] 习近平在北京大学师生座谈会上的讲话[EB/OL].http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0503/c64094-29961631.html,2020-05-24. [14] 汪劲松. 牢记使命理清思路改革创新加快发展[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,(2):7-12. [15] 邱勇.一流本科教育是”一流”大学的底色[N].光明日报,2016-06-21(013). [16] 李言荣. 对建设一流本科教育的思考[J].中国大学教学, 2019,349(9): 4-6. [17] 林忠钦. 对我国工科教育的认识与思考[J].中国科技产业,2018,(1):22-25. [18] 樊丽明,杨灿明,马骁,刘小兵,杜泽逊.新文科建设的内涵与发展路径(笔谈)[J].中国高教研究,2019,(10). [19] 吴普特. 以习近平总书记回信精神为指导面向未来农业推进新时代高等农业教育综合改革[J].中国高等教育,2019,(21):4-6. [20] 吴朝晖. 交叉会聚推动人工智能人才培养和科技创新[J].中国大学教学,2019,(2):4-8. |
|
|
|