|
|
|
| Hong Kong’s National Identity Crisis: from “Other” to “Pseudo-subject” |
| YANG Han-xu, XU Hai-bo |
| Research Center for Basic Law of Hong Kong and Macao, Shenzhen University, College of Social Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract British colonists initially brought the colonial logic of “ego” and “other” into Hong Kong which regarded “Chinese ( including Hong Kong people)” as “other”,and has thus established a “pseudo-subject” consciousness characteristic of colonialism. “Pseudo-subject” consciousness is the root cause of Hong Kong’s national identity crisis. After the reunification, due to the post-colonial cultural infiltration, the symptom, instead of perishing, has become more serious. According to the theory of Lacanian psychoanalysis, Hong Kong people must use reflective “self” to dissolve “pseudo-subject” so as to lift themselves out of the national identity crisis. At operational level, we should promote Hong Kong’s (China’s) traditional culture of inclusiveness to guard against homogenization (westernization) of cultures and values, and take into our own hands the right to write the complete history of Hong Kong (and not just the colonial history).
|
|
Received: 28 July 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] [法]弗朗兹 法农：全世界受苦的人[M].万冰译.南京：译林出版社,2005.
[2] 马克思恩格斯文集（第二卷）[M].北京：人民出版社,2009.470.
[3] Dylan Evans. An Introduction Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis[J].London and NewYork：Routledge,1996. 132-133.
[4] 生安锋.后殖民主义、身份认同和少数人化——霍米·巴巴访谈录[J]. 外国文学,2002,（06）.
[5] [美]霍米·巴巴.全球化与纠结[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2013.
[6] 专家.港人参军不会很多[EB/OL].环球网,http://mil.huanqiu.com/observation/2015-03/5800650_2.html.2015-03-03.
[7] 香港人大代表.建立机制让港澳居民自愿入伍[N].南方都市报,2015-02-24.
[8] 周八骏.全球治理体制变革与“一国两制”[N].大公报,2015-10-29.
[9] 陈左洱.为了香港未来的发展──“香港在国家发展战略中的地位和作用”[EB/OL].大公网,http://news.takungpao.com/paper/q/2015/0921/3176807.html,2015-09-21.
[10] 马克思恩格斯全集(第四十七卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.7. |
|
|
|
2015, Vol. 32 
