Abstract：In the three ways of synthesizing time, AI does not have the “future” dimension of time, the database of AI is the memory of the past dimension, and the algorithm is the habit of the present dimension. However, it lacks the expectation or prospect of the future dimension, so AI creation needs to be coupled with humans. Artificial intelligence generation image is a new form of “technical image” produced by apparatus in the software society, diffusion model simulates the inverse entropy process of technical image, generative adversarial networks replace the interaction process between humans and apparatus, automated programs weaken the creative function of human (or “einbildner”), image creation is reduced to image calculation. The computed image does not have a“punctum” or “interfuit”, but rather a fake “déjà vu”. More than half a century after the camera became a “Caméra-stylo” and the image became flexible writing-like text, the artificial intelligence generation image has reversed the process of “image → language”, the image generated by the prompt word is a process of “language → image”, which eliminates the subjective factors such as social, emotional and value judgment, and realizes “zero-degree writing”. AI creation is not only a kind of “automation aesthetics”, its visual “vibration” and the “effect” of the aesthetic process are the same as the aesthetic pursuit of pointillism. Pointillism aesthetics is not only an observer's technology, advocating “look at” the image rather than “look through” the image; but also a kind of attention production, maintaining a dynamic, temporary, flowing subject vision; and also a kind of body practice that breaks the visual centralism and practices an unstable body sensibility or embodied body affact.
范虹. AI没有未来：技术影像的零度写作与点彩美学[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2024, 41(3): 152-160.
FAN Hong. AI Has No Future：A Study of Zero-degree Writing and Pointillism Aesthetics of Technical Image. , 2024, 41(3): 152-160.
[1] 李科林. 时间的生命内涵——德勒兹的时间概念[J].世界哲学,2012,(5):99-108. [2] (俄)列夫·马诺维奇,(意)埃马努埃莱·阿列利.人工智能(AI)艺术与美学[J].陈卓轩译.世界电影,2023,(3):4-24. [3] (法)吉尔伯特·西蒙栋.技术客体的存在形式[ED/OL].秦琳译.https://ptext.nju.edu.cn/32/be/c13164a537278/page.htm,2024-03-01. [4] (巴西)威廉·弗卢塞尔.摄影哲学的思考[M].毛卫东,丁君君译.北京:中国民族摄影艺术出版社,2017. [5] (巴西)威廉·弗卢塞尔.技术图像的宇宙[M].李一君译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2021. [6] Vilém Flusser.Towards a Philosophy of Photography[M].Martin Chalmers translate.London:Reaktion Books,2000. 84. [7] Lev Manovich.Software Takes Command[M].New York:Bl-oomsbury,2013. [8] Nick Montfort.Interactive Fiction[ED/OL].http://electron-icbookreview.com/essay/interactive-fiction/,2024-03-09. [9] Zhe Wang.The Promise of Database Cinema:A Review of Lev Manovich and Andreas Kratky's “Soft Cinema:Navi-gating the Database”[J].Media Practice,2009,10(2-3):289-294. [10] Mark O. Riedl. The Lovelace 2.0 Test of Artificial Cre-ativity and Intelligence[ED/OL].https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.6142v3.pdf,2024-03-09. [11] (法)亚·阿斯特吕克.摄影机——自来水笔,新先锋派的诞生[J].刘云舟译.世界电影,1987,(6):22-26. [12] 金松林. 西方文论关键词——零度写作[J].外国文学,2020,(4):105-115. [13] (法)罗兰·巴特.S/Z[M].屠友祥译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.53. [14] Lev Manovich.AI Aesthetics[M].Moscow:Strelka Press,2018. 2. [15] Appu Shaji.How We Trained an Algorithm to Predict What Makes a Beautiful Photo[ED/OL].https://petapixel.com/2016/05/31/trained-algorithm-predict-makes-beautiful-photo/,2024-03-09. [16] (美)乔纳森·克拉里.知觉的悬置:注意力、景观与现代性[M].沈语冰,贺玉高译.南京:江苏凤凰美术出版社,2017. [17] Yingwei Pan, Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao et al.To Create What You Tell:Generating Videos from Captions[C].Pro-ceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia,2017.1789-1798. [18] Robert L. Herbert.Georges Seura,1858-1891[M].New York:Abrams,1994.381-382. [19] 周彦华. “注意力”的情动意指与艺术的主体性生产——评乔纳森·克拉里的《知觉的悬置》(上)[J].当代美术家,2017,(6):30-33. [20] (法)吉尔·德勒兹.德勒兹在万塞讷的斯宾诺莎课程(1978-1981)记录[A].生产·德勒兹与情动[C].汪民安编,姜宇辉译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2016.3-22. [21] Gilles Deleuze.L'image-temps[M].Paris:Minuit,1985.164. [22] 张一兵.巴特:文本是一种织[J].社会科学论坛,2002,(10):28-32. [23] 王建磊. 世界视频化:基于Sora的媒介认知与实践转向[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,(2):1-9.
2024, Vol. 41 
粤公网安备44030502007936号