Abstract：The Bay Area is an important growth pole in leading global economic development and technological innovation. The development of the innovation ecosystem in the bay area shows an evolutionary path from the incubation stage to the development stage and then to the maturity stage. From the perspective of the evolution of the innovation ecosystem, this paper expounds on the evolution path of the bay area, and makes a comparative analysis of the evolution process of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area and the San Francisco Bay Area in the major elements of the system, such as innovation subjects, innovation resources, innovation environment and innovation capability. The results show that the San Francisco Bay Area is in a mature innovation ecosystem, which has an innovation ecological network with innovation companies as the basis and the close collaboration between enterprises, universities and research institutes as its core. And it gathers high-quality talents and venture capital, boasts a full-fledged sci-tech legislation system and a dynamic innovation atmosphere. In comparison, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, despite a large innovation base, is faced with a shortage of high-quality research institutions, high-level talents, insufficient investment in basic research, and many impediments in original innovations, and has not established a mature sci-tech policy system and multiculturalism. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is still in the early stages of growth and there is still huge room for development. Drawing on the successful experience of the San Francisco Bay Area, to push the innovation development of the Greater Bay Area, we need to take following measures: attach importance to the innovation output evaluation mechanism and pay attention to the improvement of innovation quality; promote further collaboration between enterprises, universities and research institutes, upgrade the innovation cluster with knowledge spillover; optimize the cultivation of innovative talents, focus on the deep integration of technology and finance; and promote coordinated development of the Greater Bay Area and cross-border flow of essential factors.
段杰. 粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统演进路径及创新能力：基于与旧金山湾区比较的视角[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2020, 37(2): 91-99.
DUAN Jie. Evolution and Innovation Capability of the Innovation Ecosystem in the Greater Bay Area: Based on a Comparison with the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2020, 37(2): 91-99.
[1] Luoma-aho,Vilma,Saara Halonen. Intangibles and Innovation:The Role of Communication in the Innovation Ecosystem[J]. Innovation Journalism,2010,7(2):1-19. [2] Russell M G,Still K, Huhtam ki, Jukka, et al. Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration[R].Triple Helix Ix International Conference:“silicon Valley:Global Model Or Unique Anomaly”.2011. [3] Fukuda K, Watanabe C.Japanese and US perspectives on the National Innovation Ecosystem[J]. Technology in Society, 2008, 30(1):49-63. [4] 张运生. 高科技企业创新生态系统风险识别与控制研究[J]. 财经理论与实践,2008,29(3):113-116. [5] 杜德斌. 破解创新密码[N].文汇报,2012-11-21(12). [6] 刘娟,马学礼. 雄安新区创新驱动发展实现路径研究——创新生态系统视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018,(8): 32-37. [7] Estrin J.Closing the Innovation Gap[M].New York:McGraw-Hill, 2008. 125-129. [8] Ghemawat P.Managing differences: the central challenge of global strategy[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2007, 85(3):58. [9] De Moura H T, Adler I K. The ecology of innovation and the role of Strategic Design[J]. Strategic Design Research Journal, 2011, 4(3):112-117. [10] 搜狐财经. 报告精读:粤港澳大湾区建设报告(2018)[EB/OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=160953281103 9232715&wfr=spider&for=pc.2018-05-19. [11] 胡曙虹, 黄丽, 杜德斌. 全球科技创新中心建构的实践——基于三螺旋和创新生态系统视角的分析:以硅谷为例[J]. 上海经济研究, 2016,(3):21-28. [12] 赵光辉. 人才结构与产业结构互动机理及相关政策研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学博士论文, 2006. 26-29. [13] 王志涛, 裴长俊. 中小企业人才的流动偏好:基于交易成本的视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2010, 24(2):133-134. [14] 孙早, 许薛璐. 前沿技术差距与科学研究的创新效应——基础研究与应用研究谁扮演了更重要的角色[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017,(3):5-23. [15] 朱迎春. 创新型国家基础研究经费配置模式及其启示[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018,(2):15-22. [16] 广东社科院发布《广东风险投资报告(2017)》[J]. 新经济, 2018,(5):27. [17] Russell Hancock. Joint Venture Silicon Valley’s Institute for Regional Studies. Silicon Valley Index (2018) [EB/OL].https://www.useit.com.cn/thread-18221-1-1.html.2018-02-07. [18] 南佐民. 创新文化环境视角下硅谷的社会网络结构特征[J]. 开发研究, 2007,(1):35-37. [19] 俞文华. 面向全球市场的技术竞争:增长贡献、优势动态和结构趋同——基于WIPO的PCT申请统计分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2012,(8):1-22. [20] 张震.创新数量、创新质量与企业规模[J].经济问题,2018,(12):56-60+87. [21] Dopter k, Ports J. Evolutionary foundations of economics[J]. Chapters,2004,(9):3-23. [22] 黄鲁成. 区域技术创新生态系统的特征[J].中国科技论坛,2003,(1):23-26. [23] 刘志峰. 区域创新生态系统的结构模式与功能机制研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010,(21):9-13. [24] 芦冬青. 基于结构洞理论的区域创新生态系统创新动力机制研究[J].西昌学院学报(自然科学版),2018,(1):50-56.
2020, Vol. 37 
粤公网安备44030502007936号