Determination of Final Verdict within the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
WANG Chong1,2
1.Postdoctoral Research Center for Theoretical Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060; 2.Law School of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060
Abstract：The construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area will stimulate new theoretical thinking and provide opportunities for researches in the theoretical system of interregional judicial assistance. As an issue in the recognition and enforcement of interregional verdicts, the determination of final verdict needs to be analyzed and completed within the Greater Bay Area. Compared with other schemes proposed by academics, the “Greater Bay Area consciousness theory” is more suitable and helpful to address this issue. It stresses the importance of taking the construction of the Greater Bay Area as an opportunity and a platform for consultation, comprehensively promoting cooperation between mainland and Hong Kong and Macao in interregional judicial assistance, and determining the final verdict within this framework. Confronted with the gap between the construction of “Greater Bay Area consciousness” and the determination of final verdict, we can specify the factors that may be taken into account in the final verdict standard, establish a judicial assistance coordination system under a high-level coordination mechanism and speed up efforts in theoretical and practical studies to narrow the gap, and thus more quickly solve the problem of determining the final verdict in the “Greater Bay Area”.
王崇. 粤港澳大湾区区际判决终局性认定：以“湾区意识说”为进路[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2018, 35(6): 39-46.
WANG Chong. Determination of Final Verdict within the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. , 2018, 35(6): 39-46.
[1] 南方都市报.建议粤港澳大湾区建设协调机构:抓住重大机遇打造一流湾区[EB/OL].http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/zixun/201803/13/t20180313_28450488.shtml. [2] 冯霞. 涉港澳台区际私法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012.120-150. [3] 李继. 中国区际民商事司法协助法律问题研究[D].北京:中国政法大学2006级博士论文,2006. [4] 帅颖. 欧盟成员国民商事判决承认与执行制度研究[J].理论与改革,2009,(4):141. [5] Louisiana government.Interstate Compact summarization.[EB/OL].http://doc.louisiana.gov/interstate-compact.2018-03-14. [6] 张溪瑨. 论我国民商事判决在香港的认可与执行——HCMP1797/2015号判决析评[J].法律科学,2018,(3):189. [7] 徐鹏. 内地司法判决终局性:难以逾越的障碍——以香港法院Chiyu Banking Corp Ltd v.Chan Tin Kwun案为中心[J].环球法律评论,2006,(2):250-256. [8] Walter W.Herser. The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: The impact on Forum Non Conveniens, Transfer of Venue, Removal, and Recognition of Judgments in United States Courts[J].University of Pennsylvania journal of International Law,2010,31(4):1013-1040. [9] 新华网.专家:“一国两制”是粤港澳大湾区的重要优势[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/ga/2017/03-24/81822 93.shtml.
2018, Vol. 35 
粤公网安备44030502007936号