全球价值链嵌入与工资益贫性研究:来自中国企业的证据

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (624 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In the process of deepening the restructuring of global value chains, studying the impact of companies’ participation in global value chains on wage pro-poorness from the perspective of pro-poorness will help to further understand the internal reasons for wage income differences. This article decomposes wage pro-poorness indicators into pro-poor growth rates, pro-poor cost compensation growth rates, and the bridging growth rate of inequality within the poverty populations, and then uses Chinese industrial enterprises data to empirically test the impact of corporate participation in global value chains on wage pro-poorness and its mediating effect.The research shows that: Global value chain embedding has a significant positive impact on the pro-poorness of corporate wages, and this effect is heterogeneous among different regions and different types of companies.In terms of regional differences, the impact of global value chain embedding is more significant in the eastern region, and in terms of enterprise type differences, the role of global value chain embedding in non-state-owned enterprises is more obvious. Whether in the eastern region or in non-state-owned enterprises, global value chain embedding has a greater role in promoting the pro-poor growth rates. Mediation analysis further shows that, on the one hand, global value chain embedding directly affects the pro-poorness of wages, and on the other hand, it has an intermediary effect on the pro-poorness of wages through the intermediary effect of capital and price effects.The direct effect is generally stronger than the intermediary effect, and the price intermediary effect is significantly stronger than the capital intermediary effect. The overall effect of the price effect in the eastern region is greater, while non-state-owned enterprises have a stronger effect on the capital effect.

Key words： global value chain embeddedness wage pro-poorness PEGR index capital effects price effects

Received: 04 June 2021

PACS:

F752.7

About author:: 教育部人文社科规划项目“全球价值链参与、劳动力市场分割与收入增长的益贫性：微观数据的研究”（20 YJA790056）

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	NIU Rui

Cite this article:

NIU Rui. Research on Global Value Chain Embeddedness and Wage Pro-poorness:Evidence from Chinese Enterprises[J]. , 2021, 38(5): 71-82.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I5/71

[1] Kakwani N, Pernia H H.Linkages Between Pro-Poor Growth,Social Programs and Labor Market:The Recent Brazilian Experience[J].World Development,2000,38(6):881-894.
[2] Ravallion M, Chen S.How did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?[J].Review of Income and Wealth,2001,47(3):283-300.
[3] Son H.A Note on Pro-Poor Growth[J].Economics Letters, 2004, 82(3):307-314.
[4] Kakwani N, Son H H.Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate[J]. Review of Income and Wealth,2008,54(4):643-655.
[5] 张全红,张建华.浅析贫困、经济增长与脱贫时间——基于中国城镇居民调查数据的分析[J].经济与管理,2007, (3):11-15.
[6] 张克中,冯俊诚.通货膨胀、不平等与亲贫式增长——来自中国的实证研究[J].管理世界,2010,(5):27-33.
[7] 周华,李品芳,崔秋勇.中国多维度益贫式增长的测度及其潜在来源分解研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011,(5):37-50.
[8] 韩秀兰,李宝卿.益贫式增长与社会机会分配[J].统计研究,2011,(12):41-48.
[9] 韩秀兰. 中国城镇家庭收入增长益贫性形成机制研究[J].统计研究,2013,(5):31-36.
[10] 欧阳葵, 王国成. 社会福利函数与收入不平等的度量——一个罗尔斯主义视角[J].经济研究,2014,(2):87-100.
[11] 赵锦春,范从来.贸易自由化、劳动力市场分割与益贫式增长[J].世界经济研究,2018,(11):116-134+137.
[12] Leamer E E. In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Linkages between International Trade and Lower Wages[R].NBERWorking Paper,1998, No.6152.
[13] Feenstra R C,Hanson G H.The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages:Estimates For the United States,1979-1990[J].Quarterly Journal of Ec-onomics,1999,114(3):907-940.
[14] Green F, Dickerson A, Jorge Saba A.A Picture of Wage Inequality and the Allocation of Labor Through a Period of Trade Liberalization:The Case of Brazil[J].World Dev-elopment,2001,29(11):1923-1939.
[15] Markusen J R.Putting Per-Capita Income back into Trade Theory[J].Journal of International Economics,2013, 90(2):255-265.
[16] Ivanova, Maria N.Profit Growth in Boom and Bust: the Great Recession and the Great Depression in Compara-tive Perspective[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2017, 26(1):1-20.
[17] Wood A.Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom[J].World Bank Economic Review, 1997,11(1):33-57.
[18] Marjit S.Economic Reform and Informal Wage-A General Equilibrium Analysis[J].Journal of Development Economics,2003,72(1):371-378.
[19] Eckel C C,Grossman P J.Men,Women and Risk Aver-sion:Experimental Evidence[J].Handbook of Experimen-tal Economics Results,2008,1(7):1061-1073.
[20] 赵晓霞, 李金昌.对外贸易、FDI与城乡居民收入及差距——基于省际面板数据的协整研究[J].中国人口科学, 2009,(2):55-65.
[21] 赵锦春, 范从来. 企业异质性、全球价值链分工与劳动力要素报酬[J].江苏社会科学, 2018,(2):67-77.
[22] 陈继勇,王保双,蒋艳萍.企业异质性、出口国内附加值与企业工资水平——来自中国的经验证据[J].国际贸易问题,2016,(8):74-84.
[23] 戴枫. 贸易自由化与收入不平等——基于中国的经验研究[J].世界经济研究, 2005,(10):39-46.
[24] 胡昭玲,李红阳.参与全球价值链对我国工资差距的影响——基于分工位置角度的分析[J].财经论丛,2016,(1):11-18.
[25] 周昕. 全球价值链分工如何影响高技术劳动力相对工资?——基于我国制造业部门的研究[J].财经论丛,2017,(4):13-20.
[26] 张二震, 戴翔. 要素分工、开放发展与长三角全面小康建设的基本经验[J].江苏社会科学,2017,(5):101-111.
[27] Chaudhuri S, Yabuuchi S.Economic Liberalization and Wage Inequality in the Presence of Labor Market Imper-fection[J].International Review of Economics & Finance, 2007,16(4):592-603.
[28] Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke E.The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke(FGT)Poverty Measures:25 Years Later[J]. Journal of Economic Inequality,2010,8(4):491-524.
[29] Upward R, Wang Z, Zheng J H.Weighing China’s Export Basket: The Domestic Content and Technology Intensity of Chinese Exports[J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 2013,41(2):527-543.