明清朝贡体制下的文化交流与实物往来

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (562 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The tributary system, as the institutional design of the “Chinese and foreign order”, is externalized from the“differential order pattern” in China’s ancient society into international relations. It reflects the tradition of paying attention to etiquette and morality in foreign cultural exchanges. The foreign cultural exchanges and barter exchanges carried out by the Ming and Qing Dynasties under the tribute system mainly include the political culture of canonizing vassal kings and outputting management as well as disseminating Confucian classics and Chinese characters, conducting territory rituals in vassal countries, encouraging cultural exchanges and artistic creation between literati and craftsmen, arranging the worship of cultural landmarks and the appreciation of artistic performances, controlling the “cultural trade” of artistic treasures such as porcelain, jade and jewelry, etc. As the system design of the social order is dominated by the Ming and Qing royal courts, the tributary system not only maintained national peace and promoted economic and trade exchanges, but also played a diplomatic role in cultural exchange and cultural communication to a certain extent. On the premise that the vassal states complied with the Confucian orthodoxy of China, the Ming and Qing society led the tributary countries to be diverse and equal, and built a world order of “admitting the uniqueness of every culture, cherishing the diversity and integrity of all cultural groups” and “unity the world with harmony”.

Key words： Ming and Qing dynasties tributary system cultural tribute cultural communication exchange for physical cultural function

Received: 01 March 2021

PACS:

G124

About author:: 国家社科基金重大项目“丝绸之路经济带沿线国家文化产业合作共赢模式及路径研究”（17ZD043）; 国家“万人计划”哲学社会科学领军人才项目

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XIANG Yong

Cite this article:

XIANG Yong. The Cultural Communication and Barter Exchange of the Tributary System in the Ming and Qing Dynasties[J]. , 2021, 38(5): 5-8.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I5/5

[1] 郭嘉辉. 近代”朝贡制度”概念的形成——兼论费正清“朝贡制度论”的局限[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(1):84-92.
[2] 石元蒙. 明清朝贡体制的两种实践(1840年前)[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015.18-120.
[3] 罗沉雷. 礼物外交——从传统到现代的历史嬗变[D].北京:外交学院硕士学位论文,2020.10-47.
[4] (美)费正清.中国的世界秩序——传统中国的对外关系[M].杜继东译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010.
[5] (美)魏斐德.中华帝国的衰落[M].梅静译.北京:民主与建设出版社,2019.110.
[6] 何芳川.”华夷秩序”论[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998,(6).
[7] (美)费正清.美国与中国[M].张理京译.北京:世界知识出版社,2006.147.
[8] 梁启超. 中国史叙论[A].梁启超.饮冰室合集(第6册)[C].北京:中华书局,2015.27-58.
[9] 康有为. 康有为全集(第七集)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.44-185.
[10] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.29-70.
[11] 莫翔. ”天下-朝贡”体系及其世界秩序观[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.28.
[12] (宋)王溥.唐会要(中)(卷49僧尼所隶)[M].北京:中华书局,1998.860.
[13] (美)费正清.中国:传统与变迁[M].张沛译.北京:世界知识出版社,2002.222-223.
[14] 张正谚.狐媚燕京:海之王国占城对明朝的朝贡策略与影响[M].新北:花木兰文化出版社,2017.13-64.
[15] (日)渡濑常吉.通文馆志(卷3)[M].东京:东京印刷株式会社,1907.23-28.
[16] 何新华. 清代朝贡文书研究[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2016.7.
[17] 付百臣. 中朝历代朝贡制度研究[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2008.136-139.
[18] 陈新凤,吴明微.明朝”朝贡”制度下中国与朝鲜半岛音乐文化交流研究[J].中国音乐学,2019,(1):56-63.
[19] 明实录·太祖实录(卷四十七)[M].北京:中华书局影印本,2016.
[20] 明实录·太宗实录(卷四十七)[M].北京:中华书局影印本,2016.
[21] 明实录·太宗实录(卷八十六)[M].北京:中华书局影印本,2016.
[22] 明实录·太宗实录(卷一八十三)[M].北京:中华书局影印本,2016.
[23] 张学礼. 使琉球记[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959.12.
[24] 何新华. 最后的天朝:清代朝贡制度研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[25] 王晨光. 明清中越交通与越使朝贡问题研究[M].成都:巴蜀出版社,2017.147-174.
[26] 赵全鹏. 中国古代海洋珍宝消费与朝贡贸易关系[J].南海学刊,2018,(4):34-40.
[27] 张文德. 朝贡与入附:明代西域人来华研究[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,2013.30-44.
[28] 陈宁. 明初朝贡贸易对中国青花瓷制作的影响[J].中国陶瓷,2019,(8):87-92.
[29] 骆昭东. 朝贡贸易与仗剑经商——全球经济视角下的明清外贸政策[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.60.
[30] 叶朗. 中华文明的开放性和包容性[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(2):5-10.
[31] 黄枝连. 天朝礼治体系研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994.34-56.
[32] (德)扬·阿斯曼(Jan Assmann).文化记忆: 早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份[M].金寿福,黄晓晨译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.29-84.