|
|
Logic, Ethics and Regulation of Intelligent Recommendation Algorithme Technology |
KUANG Wen-bo |
College of Journalism, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872 |
|
|
Abstract New technologies bring new privileges to their users. They often break old patterns and challenge previous orders, bringing about a series of new problems. In the era of artificial intelligence, “algorithm is power”, which means that after being “empowered” by users and technology, recommendation algorithm technology has the special power to filter, define, deliver information and record, and store personal data, and thus in a sense replaces traditional media in value judgment and supervision. After getting these powers, algorithm is not always well-intentioned or does not always produce good results. In terms of audience, issues such as information cocoon rooms, data abuse, algorithmic black boxes, and transfer of supervision power pose threats of different degrees to users' privacy, autonomy, right to know, right of equality, and right to be forgotten. At the industry level, the way of news production and transmission has changed, and the monopoly status of professional news organizations has been impacted. At the social level, the publicity of the media and its supervisory role as a social public instrument have been weakened. Confronted with the ethical dilemma caused by recommendation algorithm technology in the field of journalism and communication, we should be people-centered, pay attention to human value, elevate the role of human being in data collection, data calculation, and algorithm modelling, and find a balance between efficiency-oriented “algorithms” and fairness-oriented “news”, and on this basis make ethical principles and application regulations for algorithmic recommendation of news.
|
Received: 03 September 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 喻国明,杨莹莹,闫巧妹.算法即权力:算法范式在新闻传播中的权力革命[J].编辑之友,2018,(5):5-12. [2] 何涛. 传播伦理在大数据时代的发展与变迁——《冲突与转向——大数据时代的传播伦理研究》[J].传媒,2018,(18):101-102. [3] 喻国明,韩婷.算法型信息分发:技术原理、机制创新与未来发展[J].新闻爱好者,2018,(4):8-13. [4] 王俊秀. 数据监控、隐私终结与隐私通货[J].探索与争鸣,2018,(5):31-35. [5] 尚帅. 传播的兴趣偏向和浑然不觉的符号暴力——基于《今日头条》的算法控制研究[J].现代传播,2018,(10):58-62. [6] 林嘉琳. 算法技术演进下新闻传播的伦理困境[J].青年记者,2019,(24):15-17. [7] 江作苏,张瑞希.“算法”在智能化场域中的冲击性及约束探讨[J].湖北社会科学,2018,(10):193-198. [8] 陈昌凤,霍婕.权力迁移与人本精神:算法式新闻分发的技术伦理[J].新闻与写作,2018,(1):63-66. [9] 徐琳. 人工智能推算技术中的平等权问题之探讨[J]. 法学评论,2019,(3):157-166 [10] 刘鑫,王超群.大数据智能传播中的算法歧视及其治理路径[J].新闻世界,2019,(12):57-59. [11] 令倩,王晓培.尊严、言论与隐私:网络时代“被遗忘权”的多重维度[J].新闻界,2019,(7):74-82. [12] 吴飞,傅正科.大数据与“被遗忘权”[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015,(2):68-78. [13] 闫宏秀. 数据与记忆伦理的新面相[J].道德与文明,2018,(4):20-25. [14] 彭兰. 假象、算法囚徒与权利让渡:数据与算法时代的新风险[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2018, (5):20-29. [15] 杨保军,李泓江.论算法新闻中的主体关系[J].编辑之友,2019,(8):5-11. [16] 方师师. 算法如何重塑新闻业:现状、问题与规制[J].新闻与写作, 2018, (9):11-19. [17] 董天策,何旭.算法新闻的伦理审视[J].新闻界,2019,(1):27-33. [18] 张超. 作为中介的算法:新闻生产中的算法偏见与应对[J].中国出版,2018,(1):29-33. [19] 吕新雨,赵月枝,吴畅畅等.生存,还是毁灭——“人工智能时代数字化生存与人类传播的未来”圆桌对话[J].新闻记者,2018,(6):28-42. [20] 靖鸣,娄翠.人工智能技术在新闻传播中伦理失范的思考[J].出版广角,2018,(1):9-13. [21] 匡文波,陈小龙.新闻推荐算法的问题及优化策略[J].网络传播,2018,(8):74-75. [22] 仇筠茜,陈昌凤.基于人工智能与算法新闻透明度的“黑箱”打开方式选择[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(5):84-88. [23] 张超. 新闻生产中的算法风险:成因、类型与对策[J]. 中国出版,2018,(13):38-42. [24] 吴雯. 当代“监控”技术的伦理困境[J].自然辩证法通讯,2019,(7):44-50. |
|
|
|