从资本逻辑到人民逻辑：生命政治本土化的主题与方向

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (496 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In the new century, especially since socialism with Chinese characteristics entered a new era, there has been a boom in the study of biopolitics in Chinese academia. As far as the physical content of Chinese society is concerned, this research boom is characterized by the localization of biopolitics. First, in terms of ideological themes, the localization of biopolitics shifts its foothold from “civil society” to “human society or socialized mankind”,taking “ the people's ever-growing needs for a better life” as the central issue, putting the expression of people's interests and political demands at the top of the list, and striving to promote the realistic construction of “Life of Kind”. Second, in terms of theory, the localization of biopolitics is rooted in the modernization of China's national governance system and governance capabilities. It changes the epistemological attitude toward national governance and actively constructs a national governance concept for human liberation. Third, in terms of ideological mission, the localization of biopolitics is committed to revealing and overcoming the civilization crisis of capitalism, transforming radical criticism of capital civilization into positive exploration of new forms of human civilization, and providing theories for the construction of new forms of human civilization.

Key words： biopolitics localization people logic needs for a better life governance modernization new forms of civilization

Received: 22 July 2020

PACS:

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Ai-long

Cite this article:

LI Ai-long. From Capital Logic to People Logic: Theme and Direction of Biopolitics Localization[J]. , 2021, 38(1): 103-110.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I1/103

[1] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[2] 林进平. 论马克思主义正义观的三重阐释路径[J].哲学研究,2019,(8):42-49.
[3] 马克思恩格斯文集(第8卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第8卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[4] (法)福柯.性经验史[M].佘碧平译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.101.
[5] 马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第5卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 338.
[6] 俞吾金. 实践与自由[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2010.344.
[7] 张轶瑶.生命的政治隐喻与生命政治的现代性伦理构序[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(5):27-33+146.
[8] (意)阿甘本.神圣人:至高权力与赤裸生命[M].吴冠军译.北京:中央编译出版社,2016.170.
[9] (法)福柯.安全、领土与人口[M].钱翰,陈晓径译.上海:上海人民出版社,2010.35.
[10] (法)福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012.155.
[11] 高奇琦.填充与虚无:生命政治的内涵与扩展[J].政治学研究,2016,(1):24-38+125-126.
[12] 张梧. 人学视野中的马克思主义治理观[J].理论视野,2017,(9):21-23.
[13] 马克思恩格斯文集(第3卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 562.
[14] 马克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 927-928.
[15] 马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[16] (法)鲍德里亚.象征交换与死亡[M].车槿山译.南京:译林出版社,2006.105.
[17] 胡大平.当现实走到启蒙的前面——超级现代性的哲学批评[J].哲学研究,2019,(10):49-57+127-128.
[18] 夏莹. 哲学对政治的僭越:当代生命政治的隐形支点[J].南京社会科学,2017,(7):25-32.
[19] (美)哈特,(意)奈格里.大同世界[M].王行坤译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.106.