|
|
|
| A Package Discussion on the Suspension of Chinese Aggravated Crime |
| CHEN Hong-bing |
| Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,211189 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There may be suspension of crime in aggravated offenses.The completion of basic offenses with basis results without aggravated results (or elements),suspension of basic offenses after aggregated results (or elements) occur,and the suspension of the aggravated result (or element) and the basic crime result at the same time may constitute the suspension of the aggravated crime.If the offender takes the initiative to eliminate danger and avoid (serious) real harm after creating a dangerous scenario,he actually suspends the dangerous crime.He should be exempted or mitigated from penalty on the basis of basic criminal law of dangerous crime.In the case of intentional consequential aggravated crime,there may be three kinds of suspension of aggregated crime:suspension of aggravated result,suspension of basic crime result,and simultaneous suspension of aggravated result and basic crime result.In the case of aggravated consequential offense of negligence,there may be suspension of aggravated crime whose result is aggravated but the result of basic crime is suspended.In the case of joint offense,there are usually three kinds of suspension of aggregated crime.In the case of the aggravated crimes related to the amount of property,victim,location and means of crime,if the offender voluntarily gives up a substantial amount of property,a specific victim,a specific location,or a specific means of crime,his behavior may be regarded as the suspension of the aggravated crime.In addition,serious offenses may also be suspended.When it comes to aggregated crime of consequence,aggregated crime of function (status),aggregated crime of multiple people (times),there is only the question of whether the charged are convicted or not,and thus there is no suspension of crime in this case.The suspension of aggravated crime should be exempted or mitigated from penalty according to the provisions of suspension of crime.In view of our country's heavy legal penalty,we should also consider mitigating penalty if the result of aggravated crime occurs but the result of basic crime is suspended.If the offender is convicted of an accomplished felony at the same time,we need to refer to the result of the mitigated punishment and give him a heavier penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 庄绪龙.“法益可恢复性犯罪”概念之提倡[J].中外法学,2017,(4):969-999.
[2] 张明楷.简论部分的中止[J].法学杂志,2013,(4):19-25.
[3] 张正新,金泽刚.论刑法中的多次犯罪[J].湖北社会科学,2011,(7):151-157.
[4] 刘之雄.中止犯处罚的司法困境与立法完善[J].法学评论,2018,(1):120-130.
[5] 刘宪权.故意犯罪停止形态相关理论辨正[J].中国法学,2010,(1):111-122.
[6] 刘明祥.论危险犯的既遂、未遂与中止[J].中国法学,2005,(6):130-137.
[7] 周铭川.论法定危险状态出现之后能否成立中止犯[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,(3):40-48.
[8] 张明楷.危险驾驶罪的基本问题——与冯军教授商榷[J].政法论坛,2012,(6):130-141
[9] 郭利沙.具体危险犯及其结果加重犯关系新解读——以刑法第114条与第115条第1款的关系为例[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2017,(4):106-116.
[10] 高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学(第七版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,高等教育出版社,2016.149.
[11] 李洁.刑法学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.130.
[12] 张明楷.刑法学(上)(第五版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.346.
[13] 赵秉志.刑法总论(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.218.
[14] 陈洪兵.公共危险犯解释论与判例研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2011.15.
[15] 张明楷.刑法学(下)(第五版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.691.
[16] 张明楷.绑架罪中“杀害被绑架人”研究[J].法学评论,2006,(3):17-24.
[17] 张明楷.外国刑法纲要(第二版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.346.
[18] 张明楷.刑法原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.423.
[19] 张明楷.绑架罪的基本问题[J].法学,2016,(4):118-131.
[20] 周铭川.绑架罪情节加重犯研究[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(2):57-64.
[21] 陈兴良.刑法学(第三版)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2016.238.
[22] 曲新久.刑法学(第五版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2016.434.
[23] 陈洪兵.人身犯罪解释论与判例研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012.218.
[24] 张明楷.加重构成与量刑规则的区分[J].清华法学,2011,(1):7-15.
[25] 吴情树.论数额加重犯未遂的法定刑适用[J].法学,2017,(11):182-192.
[26] 黎宏.论盗窃罪数额犯的未遂[J].环球法律评论,2018,(1):66-82.
[27] 阮齐林.论盗窃罪数额犯的既遂标准[J].人民检察,2014,(19):10-16.
[28] 王志祥.数额加重犯基本问题研究[J].法律科学(西北政法学院学报),2007,(4):132-140.
[29] 王华伟.数额犯未遂问题研究——从最高人民法院第62号指导性案例切入[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019,(5):117-127.
[30] 张明楷.中止犯中的“造成损害”[J].中国法学,2013,(5):112-122.
[31] 张明楷.中止犯减免处罚的根据[J].中外法学,2015,(5):1306-1323. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
