后人类进程中的伦理与政治

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (548 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The rapid development of aerospace industry, clinical medicine, genetic engineering and artificial intelligence have prompted mankind into the post-human process, which builds the “technology-based” social contact by virtue of “aggregation technologies”, and forms a post-environment society in which technology dominates human orientation. In the post-human process, post-technolism abandons “biology-based” and “culture-based” social contact, and changes the objects and ways of people's dependency through technology, which makes people constantly lose their existence relevance, thus leading people from individuality to capriciousness, giving up responsibilities in capriciousness and gradually falling into fundamental ethical dilemmas and political conflicts. The former reveals the irreconcilability between technical standards and human norms and natural law, while the latter highlights the fundamental opposition between technological power and rights of humanity. This opens up the possibility of breaking through post-technolism and reconstructing post-ethical programs and post-political frameworks. In terms of the former, it is to establish the law system of ethical priority, that is, natural law guides humans, and human norms regulate technology. In terms of the latter, it is necessary to build a legal system that gives priority to human rights, that is, the norms of human rights guide technology and technological power.

Key words： post-human process post-technolism post-technology stage gene editing converging technology post environmental society post-ethical programs post-political frameworks

Received: 28 September 2018

PACS:

B82

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TANG Dai-xing

Cite this article:

TANG Dai-xing. Ethics and Politics in Post-human Process[J]. , 2019, 36(1): 14-23.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I1/14

[1] 肖明文. 身体、机器与后人类:后人文主义视角下的《救人就是救自己》[J].文学理论前沿,2014,(20):32-33.
[2] (英)尼古拉斯·罗斯.生命本身的政治:21世纪的生物医学、权力和主体性[M].尹晶译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.98.
[3] (法)福柯.词与物:人文科学考古学[M].莫伟民译.上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001.506.
[4] Donna Haraway.Simians,Cyborgs,andWomen:The Reinvention Nature[M].London: Routledge,1991.
[5] 林建光,李育霖.赛博格与后人类主义[M].北京:华艺学术出版社,2013.3.
[6] (加)威廉姆·工·凡登伯格.生活在技术迷宫中[M].朱春艳,吕松涛译.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2015.
[7] (美)迈克尔·桑德尔.反对完美:科技与人性的正义之战[M].黄慧慧译.北京: 中信出版社,2013.97.
[8] (美)马尔库塞.现代文明与人的困境[A].马尔库塞文集[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1995.108.
[9] (美)马尔库塞.工业革命和新左派[M].任立编译.北京:商务印书馆,1982.
[10] 周辅成. 西方伦理学名著选辑(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.89.
[11] (美)J.吕埃尔.技术的社会[J].科学与哲学,1983,(1).
[12] J.Ellul.The Technological Order.In:Mitcham C,ed.Philosophy and Technology[M].New York:The Free Press,1983.25.
[13] J.Ellul.The Technological Society[M].Vintage Books New York:knopf Random Hous,1964.
[14] (美)弗洛姆.健全的社会[M].欧阳谦译.北京:中国文联出版公司,1988.370.
[15] (德)冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的科技[M].宋祖良译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.40.
[16] (美)戈兰.科学与反科学[M].北京:中国国际广播出版社,1988.28.
[17] 孙周兴选编.海德格尔选集(下)[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996.885.
[18] J.Ellul.The Technological Society[M].New York: Vintage Books,1964.
[19] (德)G.弗里德里奇,(波)J.沙夫.微电子学与社会[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1984.203.
[20] F.Rapp.Analytical Philosophy of Technology[M].Springer,1981.
[21] 宋祖良. 拯救地球和人类未来:海德格尔的后期思想[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.52.
[22] 唐代兴. 伦理学原理(自序)[M].上海:三联书店,2018.2.