|
|
|
| Ten Major Relationships in China’s Local Governance Innovation |
| CHEN Ke-lin, GU Zhi-jun |
| College of Urban Governance, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the decisive period of building a well-off society in an all-round way, innovation-driven development is becoming the core strategy for china’s national development. Local governance innovation at the center of practice and theory still faces many prominent practical problems. Based on the review of relevant theories and practices, we can abstract and summarize the deeper logical relationships behind the innovation practices of local governments as follows: the hierarchical relationship of technology, system and governance innovation; the dialectical relationship of creation, destruction and governance innovation; the purpose relationship of success, failure and governance innovation; the fundamental relationship of truth, falsehood and governance innovation; the strained relationship of law, system and governance innovation; the gaming relationship of power, interest and governance innovation; the interactive relationship of the market, society and governance innovation; the advancement relationship of spontaneity, enforcement and governance innovation; the impetus relationship of pressure, change and governance innovation; the development relationship of short-term planning, long-term vision and governance innovation. The relationship between these variables is of great significance for understanding and guiding the theory and practice of local governance innovation. In terms of goal setting, China's local governance innovation should follow the path of multi-level coordination and orderly management, aim at good governance and promotion of common good. Besides, we also need to be committed to system construction and rule of law, proactive in innovation and have a long-term vision.
|
|
Received: 11 August 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 俞可平. 论政府创新的若干基本问题[J].文史哲,2005,(4):138-146.
[2] 林毅夫,蔡昉,李周.论中国经济改革的渐进式道路[J]. 经济研究,1993,(9):3-11.
[3] 黄卫平. 论中央授权下的改革局部先行模式[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2014,(4):6-13.
[4] 竺乾威.辩证看待顶层设计与摸着石头过河的关系[N]. 北京日报,2013-01-07(A17).
[5] 习近平再论改革:以更大政治勇气深化重要领域改革[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/.2013-01-01.
[6] Joseph A.Schumpeter.The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and business cycle[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1934.
[7] 刘志铭,郭惠武.创新、创造性破坏与内生经济变迁——熊彼特主义经济理论的发展[J].财经研究,2008,(2):18-30.
[8] 杨雪冬. 过去10年的中国地方政府改革——基于中国地方政府创新奖的评价[J].公共管理学报,2011,(1):81-93.
[9] 曹伟. 政府创新管理的制度建构:基于杭州实践的研究[J].中国行政管理, 2014,(10):29-32.
[10] 孙晓莉. 政府公共服务创新:类型、动力机制及创新失败[J].中国行政管理,2011,(7):47-50.
[11] 郭斌,陈劲,许庆瑞.失败创新项目“潜在收益效应”研究[J].科研管理,1997,(4):36-40.
[12] 金太军,袁建军.地方政府创新博弈分析[J].江海学刊, 2005,(5):94-99.
[13] 周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,(7):36-50.
[14] 周飞舟. 锦标赛体制[J].社会学研究,2009,(3):54-77.
[15] 沈承诚. 地方政府伪创新的机理探究及反伪举措——基于新制度经济学视角的考量[J].理论与改革,2006,(2):16-19.
[16] 李步云,赵迅.什么是良法[J].法学研究,2005,(6):125-135.
[17] 夏恿. 法治是什么——渊源、规诫与价值[J].中国社会科学,1999,(7):117-143.
[18] 谷志军,陈科霖.政府创新与依法行政的张力及平衡[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,(6):74-79.
[19] 郑永年. 中国的“行为联邦制”:中央—地方关系的变革与动力[M].北京:东方出版社,2013.
[20] Chenggang Xu.The Fundamental Institutions of China’ s Reforms and Development[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2011, 49(4):1076-1151.
[21] [美]道格拉斯·诺思.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1981.
[22] 周雪光. 权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,2011,(10):67-85.
[23] 何增科. 中国政府创新的趋势分析——基于五届“中国地方政府创新奖”获奖项目的量化研究[J].北京行政学院学报,2011,(1):1-8.
[24] Shipan, Charles R.,Craig Volden.Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from US Cities to States[J].American Journal of Political Science, 2006,50(4):825-843.
[25] 陈家喜,汪永成.政绩驱动:地方政府创新的动力分析[J].政治学研究,2013,(4):50-56.
[26] 杨雪冬. 简论中国地方政府创新的十个问题[J].公共管理学报,2008,(1):16-26.
[27] 吴建南,马亮,杨宇谦.中国地方政府创新的动因、特征与绩效——基于“中国地方政府创新奖”的多案例文本分析[J].管理世界,2007,(8):43-51. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 35 
