从知识论转向实践论：民主实践中代表问题研究范式的转型

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (11)

Download: PDF (494 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The current research on representation and related issues is mainly carried out in two aspects: One is the analytic philosophy approach, which focuses on the definition of representation, explaining "representation" with "representatives". The other is the historical tradition, whose main concern is the historical tradition of representation practice, focusing on the historical diversity of representation practice. On the whole, these studies are generally epistemology-oriented with the purpose of knowledge quest. However, in order to effectively reflect the democratic spirit and respond positively to the democratic demands of the times, it is even more necessary to study the representation issues from the perspective of democracy theory with the purpose of seeking governance. This first means that representation in democracy should be understood from the perspective of “selection” rather than “election”. In addition, it also means, on one hand, compared with the epistemological issues such as “what is the definition of representation” and “what are the historical traditions of representation practice”, effectively solving the problems of “distortion of representative identity” and “the quality of representation practice” in democracy are more urgent and important, on the other hand, reasonable representation practice is not based on the definition of representation and traditional representation practice experience, but on the long-term interaction between representation and democracy, in which the effective representation practice can not only promote the rationality of representation practice, but also enable the coordination and unity of representation practice and democracy.

Key words： democracy epistemology-oriented practice-orientated approach representation practice transition

Received: 10 June 2017

D082

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	FAN Fan

Cite this article:

FAN Fan. From Epistemology-oriented to Practice-oriented: Transition of Research Paradigms of Representation Issue in Democracy[J]. , 2018, 35(4): 88-96.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2018/V35/I4/88

[1] 习近平在庆祝全国人民代表大会成立60周年大会上发表重要讲话强调:毫不动摇坚持和完善人民代表大会制度,坚持走中国特色社会主义政治发展道路[N].人民日报,2014-09-06.
[2] 科恩. 论民主[M].聂崇信,朱秀贤译.北京:商务印书馆,1988.83.
[3] 查尔斯·蒂利.民主[M].魏洪钟译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.12.
[4] 钱永祥. 动情的理性:政治哲学作为道德实践[M].中国台北:联经出版实业股份有限公司,2014.147.
[5] Plotke D.Representation is Democracy[J].Constellations, 2010,(1):19-34.
[6] 菲利普·佩迪特.代表:回应与标示[J].开放时代,2012,(12):13-20.
[7] 周光辉. 论公共权力的合法性[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2007.92.
[8] 马克斯·韦伯.学术与政治[M].冯克利译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.
[9] 罗志田. 经典淡出之后:20世纪中国史学的转变与延续[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013.
[10] 冯克利. 政治学的史学转向:马基雅维里的现代意义刍议[J].政治思想史,2011,(3):100-120.
[11] 列奥·施特劳斯.什么是政治哲学[M].李世祥等译.北京:华夏出版社,2011.48.
[12] 罗志田.道大无外:校园与社会[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[13] 刘仲敬.当中华帝国遭遇民族国家[N].经济观察报书评,2016-02-22.
[14] 王汎森. 执拗的低音:一些历史思考方式的反思[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2014.
[15] 韩非子[M].高华平等译注.北京:中华书局,2010.
[16] 迈克尔·曼.社会权力的来源(第二卷)[M].陈海宏等译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2007.
[17] 包刚升. “国家治理”的新思路[J].南风窗,2013,(24):20-21.
[18] 樊凡. “普遍同意”还是“普遍满意”:民主实践的正当性基础研究[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2017,(1):78-86.
[19] 冯克利. 打了折扣的民主[A].冯克利.尤利西斯的自缚[C].北京:中信出版社,2013.
[20] 赵汀阳. 民主的最小伤害原则和最大兼容原则[J].哲学研究,2008,(6):64-71.
[21] 罗伯特·阿克塞尔罗德.合作的进化[M].吴坚忠译.上海:上海世纪出版社,2007.36.
[22] 弗朗西斯·福山.政治秩序的起源:从全人类时代到法国大革命[M].毛俊杰译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2012.
[23] Fukuyama F.Political order and political decay: from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy[M]. Profile Books, 2014.10.
[24] 龚蔚红. 法治治理民主失效的政治基础研究[J].社会科学战线,2010,(8):181-186.
[25] 乔万尼·萨托利.民主新论[M].阎克文译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.20.
[26] 程正明,曾庆辉.如何加强对人大代表的全程监督[N]. 学习时报, 2011-11-28.