我国城市治理现代化的范式选择与路径构想

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (515 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a foundation and significant component of national governance system, urban governance plays a pivotal role in the advancement of the “five in one” overall plan and the “four comprehensive” strategic layout. However, with the acceleration of urbanization, China's urban governance modernization faces many difficulties and challenges. How to promote the reform and innovation of the government to realize the modernization of urban governance becomes the basic issue of the modernization of national governance capability. Based on the analysis of the connotation and evolution of government innovation, the theoretical origins of urban governance and its value connotation, this paper points out that there is a dialectical relationship between the urban government innovation and modernization of urban governance: innovation value determines the achievement of urban governance; innovation ability determines urban governance capability; city government innovation determines the degree of city governance. In turn, modernization of urban governance can not only optimize the space and social environment for government innovation, but also the path of city government innovation. Therefore, government innovation is the preferred paradigm for China to realize urban governance modernization. Guided by the conception of achieving urban governance modernization through innovative governance, taking the path of realizing urban governance modernization through innovative urban governance mechanism, we are expected to drive forward China’s modernization of urban governance through promoting the sustainable development of urban governance with scientific and technological innovation, and increasing soft power of urban governance with cultural innovation.

Key words： governance innovation modernization of urban governance national governance capacity model selection path conception

Received: 15 January 2018

D035

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Pu-qu
	LEI Yu-ruo

Cite this article:

WANG Pu-qu,LEI Yu-ruo. The Model Selection and Path Conception of Urban Governance Modernization in China[J]. , 2018, 35(2): 91-99.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2018/V35/I2/91

[1] 朱未易. 论城市治理法治的价值塑型与完善路径[J]. 政治与法律,2015,(2):72-79.
[2] JACK L.W.The Diffusion of Innovation Among the American States[J].The American Political Science Review,1969,63(3):880-899.
[3] Stoker,G.Local governance in Britain[J].Glasgow Department of government, University of Strathclyde, mimeo,1994,(11):6.
[4] 雷雨若,王浦劬.西方国家福利治理与政府社会福利责任定位[J].国家行政学院学报,2016,(2):133-138.
[5] 陈雪莲. 国外政府创新的研究与实践[J].国家行政学院学报,2010,(1):116-120.
[6] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].共产党员网,http://www.12371.cn/2017/10/27/ARTI1509103656574313.shtml.2017-10-27.
[7] 郁建兴,黄亮.当代中国地方政府创新的动力:基于制度变迁理论的分析框架[J].学术月刊,2017,49(2):96-105.
[8] 程晟.公民导向:地方政府创新的路径——基于杭州的实证分析[J].领导科学,2015,(35):26-27.
[9] 郭明. 充分发挥社会组织作用是地方政府创新公共服务供给模式的重要路径——基于N镇的案例分析[J].理论导刊,2015,(2):16-19.
[10] 吴娜,姚荣.包容性创新我国地方政府创新的路径选择[J].商业时代,2012,(34):91-92.
[11] 陈家刚. 政府创新与民主:一个分析框架[J].学习与探索,2006,(2):105-112.
[12] 王法硕. 制度设计、治理能力与自我更新:地方政府创新扩散效果研究——以城市公共自行车项目为例[J].中国行政管理,2016,(6):109-114.
[13] 曹海军,霍伟桦.城市治理理论的范式转换及其对中国的启示[J]. 中国行政管理,2013,(7):94-99.
[14] 陈文. 城市治理转型研究——后单位时代中国城市治理困境与出路[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2016.15.
[15] 何增科. 城市治理评估的初步思考[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,29(4):6-7.
[16] [英]乔纳森·S.戴维斯,[美]戴维·L.英布罗肖.城市政治学理论前沿[M].何艳玲译.上海:格致出版社,2013.
[17] 弗朗西斯·福山.国家构建——21 世纪的国家治理与世界秩序[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.1.
[18] Hambleton, Robin,Jill Simone Gross. Governing Cities in A Global Era: Urban Innovation, Competition, and Democratic Reform[M].Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.9.
[19] 鲍勃·杰索普,程浩译.治理与元治理:必要的反思性、必要的多样性和必要的反讽性[J].国外理论动态,2014,(5):14-22.
[20] Peters,B.G.Is governance for everybody?[J].Policy and Society,2014,(4):301-306.
[21] 吴建南,郑长旭.中国城市治理研究的过去、现在与未来——基于学术论文的计量分析[J].中国行政管理,2017,(7):92-97.
[22] Sun X, Huang R.Extension of State-Led Growth Coalition and Grassroots Management: A Case Study of Shanghai[J].Urban Affairs Review, 2016, 52(6):917-943.
[23] 杨宏山. 转型中的城市治理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
[24] 中国社会科学院社会发展战略研究院:中国公众参与调查报告(2012)[R].http://news.163.com/12/1207/17/8I 504NRO00014JB5_all.html.2012-12-06.
[25] Laurila H. Urban Governance, Competition, and Welfare[J].Urban Studies, 2003, 41(3):683-696.
[26] [美]彼得·马库塞等.寻找正义之城:城市理论和实践中的辩论[M].贾荣香译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[27] 陈柳钦. “钦点”城市[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2017.
[28] 殷洁,罗小龙.尺度重组与地域重构:城市与区域重构的政治经济学分析[J].人文地理,2013,(2):67-73.
[29] 闫帅. 从治理城市到城市治理:城市空间正义的政治学分析[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,31(4):6-10.
[30] [英]艾伦·哈丁,泰尔加·布劳克兰德.城市理论[M].王岩译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
[31] 王佃利. 政府创新与我国城市治理模式的选择[J].国家行政学院学报,2005,(1):31-34.
[32] 世界银行和国务院发展研究中心.中国城镇化之路:高效包容可持续[N].中国信息报,http://www.zgxxb.com.cn/jsdk/201506230032.shtml.2015-06-24.
[33] 吴晓林,侯雨佳. 城市治理理论的“双重流变”与融合趋向[J].天津社会科学,2017,(1):69-74、80.
[34] 杨雪锋. 理解城市治理现代化[J].经济社会体制比较,2016,(6):16-19.
[35] 何艳玲. 中国城市发展新逻辑:应从更自主走向更健康,最后达到更美好[J].环境经济,2017,(12):41-43.
[36] 孙永正,王秀秀.基于新型城镇化的城市治理战略转型[J].党政视野,2016,(5):31.
[37] 郭小聪. 中国地方政府制度创新的理论:作用与地位[J].政治学研究,2000,(1):67-73.
[38] 芦东旭. 我国智慧城市建设面临问题及对策[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2017,(5):17.
[39] 庄德林,陈信康,李影.全球六大国际都市软实力比较研究[J].人文地理,2010,25(6):73-78、113.
[40] 秦德君. 城市文化创新的界面、廊道与维度[J].学术界,2016,(5):53-60.