|
|
|
| On Modernity of Curriculum Reform in Higher Education |
| CUI Wei-sheng |
School of Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guagdong, 510631;
International Business College, South China Normal University, Foshan, Guangdong, 528225 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract On one hand, modernity refers to modern characteristics of human society gradually formed in the process of modernization. On the other hand, it refers to rationality and subjectivity of human beings in the process of modernization. Subjectivity, independence and rationality constitute human modernity. Although the relationship between human modernity and social modernization is a kind of bidirectional construction, human modernity is the premise of social modernization. In modern society, higher education as a mode of recording and transmitting modernity, its function and essential attribute are to develop human modernity. Curriculum is the major carrier of higher education as well as the basic approach to develop students’ subjectivity and to expand their modernity. Therefore, the objective of modernity is implicit in the curriculum reform of higher education, which is mainly manifested in the following four aspects: the diversity of curriculum objectives, the openness of curriculum content, the subjectivity of curriculum implementation, and the humanity of curriculum evaluation.
|
|
Received: 20 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈嘉明.现代性与后现代性十五讲[M].北京：北京大学出版社, 2006.4.
[2] [德]于尔根·哈贝马斯. 现代性的哲学话语[M].曹卫东译.南京:译林出版社,2011.2.
[3] 罗荣渠.现代化新论——中国的现代化之路 [M] 上海：华东师范大学出版社,2013.12.
[4] 福柯.何为启蒙[A].杜小真编选.福柯集[C].上海:上海远东出版社,1998.534.
[5] 尤西林.“现代性”及其相关概念梳理[J]. 思想战线,2009,(5):81-83.
[6] 龙宝新,李红亚. 教育现代性研究的困境与出路：人的现代性的视角[J]. 教育理论与实践,2006,(8):9-12.
[7] 瞿振元.实现高等教育现代化要理论先行 [C] 范笑仙等.改革·质量·责任：高等教育现代化——2013年高等教育国际论坛文集 [A].北京:中国人事出版社,2014.7.
[8] [美]阿历克斯·英格尔斯.人的现代化[M].殷陆君译.成都：四川人民出版社,1985.5.
[9] 陈桂生. 历史的“教育学现象”透视[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,1998：70-78.
[10] 刘旭东.现代课程的价值取向研究[M].兰州: 甘肃教育出版社,2002.2.
[11] 吕达.课程史论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1999. 357.
[12] R.M.Hutchins. The Learning Society[M].New York: Frederick A. Praeger,1968. 134.
[13] [巴西]保罗·弗莱雷.被压迫者教育学[M].顾建新等译.上海：华东师范大学出版社,2001. 41.
[14] 华逸云, 刘良华. 西学东渐的影响与中国师资文化的特点——第三届上海课程圆桌论坛会议综述[J]. 全球教育展望,2015,（9）:123-128. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 33 
