|
Abstract Jacques Derrida focuses on opposing of Husserl’s concept of intentional history to empirical history. He characterizes this account of the historicity belonging to the ideality of ideal meaning, and explores the opposition of ideality and histority by exploring the meaning of historicity and historicity as meaning. It is in the awakening of the historicity of meaning and the meaning of its very historicity, Derrida’s opposition of the ideality language and the empiricality language yields his concept of “transcendental language”, and in the infinite telos, he accounts the deferral of ideality as manifest. Derrida attributes the reason of impossibility of ideality to apprehending the “alterity”of its origin, he doesn’t understand Husserls twofold account of the problem of the origin of ideality: the objectivity of an intersubjective tradition and the objectivity of ideal object’s ontic-meaning, which lead to misunderstanding to Husserl. It is in the misunderstanding that the problem of origin of ideality is integrated into the problem of origin of the objectivity of intersubjective tradition which leads to Derrida’s collapse.
|
|
Received: 30 September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015, Vol. 32 
