地方政府新质生产力注意力如何影响城乡产业结构升级

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (611 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The local government’s attention to new quality productivity refers to the local government’s priority in value selection and targeted focus on new quality productivity issues in the face of an overload of public governance matters. This attention distribution of new productivity has a profound impact on the logic of regional governance and the direction of resource supply, and has an important impact on the upgrading of urban and rural industrial structure. Based on the panel data of 280 cities from 2009 to 2021, this paper explores the correlation between the local government’s attention to new productivity and the upgrading of urban and rural industrial structure. The results show that the promotion effect of local government’s attention to new productivity on the upgrading of urban and rural industrial structure shows a U-shaped trend of decreasing first and then increasing, and the promotion effect is mainly realized through the channels of marketization level, non-agricultural fiscal expenditure and non-agricultural technological innovation. Reasonable labor factor flow rate and high level of industrial chain resilience can help local governments to speed up the development of new quality productivity, and it is more conducive to giving full play to the positive effect of new quality productivity attention on the upgrading of urban and rural industrial structure; the influence of local government’s attention to new productivity on different geographical spaces, policy time points and industrial bases is quite different, and the promotion effect on the eastern and western regions, after the implementation of broadband China strategy and non-old industrial bases is more prominent. Therefore, when distributing the attention of new quality productivity, local governments need to design the development strategy of new quality productivity according to local conditions, build a suitable service system, maintain a reasonable flow rate of labor factors, and strengthen the resilience level of the regional industrial chain, to prevent the strengthening of urban and rural industrial faults.

Key words： local government attention new quality productivity U-shape relationship the upgrading of industrial structure urban-rural integration development

Received: 01 September 2025

PACS:

F124

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHU Ting
	FANG Kai

Cite this article:

ZHU Ting,FANG Kai. The Impact of Local Government Attention to New Quality Productivity on the Upgrading of Urban and Rural Industrial Structure[J]. , 2026, 43(2): 78-90.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I2/78

[1] 习近平. 习近平经济文选(第1卷)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2025.515-516.
[2] 中国共产党第二十届中央委员会第四次全体会议公报(2025年10月23日中国共产党第二十届中央委员会第四次全体会议通过)[J].中国人大,2025,(21):6-9.
[3] 郭晗,侯雪花.新质生产力推动现代化产业体系构建的理论逻辑与路径选择[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(1):21-30.
[4] 张林,蒲清平.新质生产力的内涵特征、理论创新与价值意蕴[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023,29(6):137-148.
[5] 李积萍. 数字技术赋能乡村振兴的内在逻辑、现实困境与实践路径[J].区域经济评论,2025,(6):54-59.
[6] 张杰,周艳菊,王宗润.新质生产力保障产业链供应链安全:理论框架与路径研究[J].当代经济管理,2024,46(10): 15-26.
[7] 黄群慧,盛方富.新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J].改革,2024,(2):15-24.
[8] 赵鹏,李毅格.数字新质生产力驱动新型工业化发展的机制与路径研究[J].产业经济评论,2024,(5):38-50.
[9] 王天雨,卢宇.数据要素赋能新质生产力发展与新业态培育的耦合关系、内在机制和发展建议[J].西南金融,2025,(8):18-29.
[10] Berlyne,D.E.Attention-Historical and Philosophical Roo-ts of Perception[M].New York:Academic Press,1974.124.
[11] 赵建国,王瑞娟.政府注意力分配与中国社会保障事业发展——基于1978—2019年国务院政府工作报告内容的分析[J].财经问题研究,2020,(11):3-12.
[12] 练宏. 注意力分配:基于跨学科视角的理论述评[J].社会学研究,2015,(4):215-241.
[13] 谢和均,付炜,黄仁秋.地方政府新质生产力注意力配置与政策工具规划——基于2024年度31个省级政府工作报告文本量化分析[J].学术交流,2024,(10):28-42.
[14] 叶邦银,徐怀宁,李辛熠.政府环境审计、注意力配置与国有企业绿色创新质量[J].审计与经济研究,2023,38(3):1-10.
[15] 李佳霖,董嘉昌.地方政府注意力配置对企业创新活动的影响研究[J].科研管理,2023,44(9):47-59.
[16] 谢清华,王嘉发,刘显福.新质生产力引领国家审计监督提质增效的机理与路径[J].财会月刊,2025,46(18):83-89.
[17] 陈龙. 新质生产力的出场逻辑、核心内涵与实现路径[J].人文杂志,2024,(5):11-20.
[18] 张敏敏,张国琰.公平竞争与企业生产率:配置优化还是竞争逃离?[J].技术经济,2023,42(6):102-114.
[19] 卓琦培. 试论城市经济作用场与城郊型农业发展战略[J].农业区划,1988,(4):42-49.
[20] 赵德昭,韩宁,余泳泽,等.地方财政收入目标约束与共同富裕[J].财经论丛(浙江财经大学学报),2025,(7):5-17.
[21] 徐国民,石宇童.新质生产力的双重规定性及其发展路径[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,58(5):107-116.
[22] 王琳,贾书真.“授之以鱼”还是“授之以渔”:地方财政支出、营商环境优化与产业结构升级[J].经济社会体制比较,2024,(3):86-98.
[23] 青岛财政28条举措“加码”培壮新质生产力[N].青岛日报,2025-04-25(002).
[24] 阳镇,方莹莹,陈劲.科技创新与产业创新深度融合:基于产业链链主的视角[J].学习与实践,2025,(9):68-79.
[25] 吴和燊,林青宁,刘瀛弢,等.我国农业高校科技创新效率及影响因素研究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2018,36(7):59-64.
[26] 李中建,王志华.大国小农的农业强国之路:约束及破解[J].西南金融,2023,(12):41-53.
[27] 郭扬,黄艾婷,曲嘉瑞.新能源企业创新发展与区域碳排放效率的耦合协调及障碍因子分析[J].生态经济,2025, 41(6):20-33.
[28] 李翼,张如平.标准化的收入分配效应——基于企业劳动收入份额的视角[J].当代财经,2025,(12):32-44.
[29] 敖丽萍,符建华.数据要素水平对产业链韧性的影响研究[J].商业经济,2025,(10):48-51.
[30] 张纯洪,金巧智.产业转移对区域碳排放强度的影响 ——基于国家级承接产业转移示范区政策的实证检验[J].上海经济研究,2025,(9):34-47.
[31] 孙力军. 金融发展与二元经济结构转换的因果关系——基于多变量VAR模型的分析[J].华东经济管理,2009,23(2):41-44.
[32] 曹建飞. 数字经济、要素流动与中国式城市现代化[J].统计与决策,2025,41(16):5-10.
[33] 吴承忠,陈平.地方政府文旅融合注意力对旅游经济发展的影响效应及作用机制[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,42(3):44-56.
[34] 孙鹏,易培德,张诗怡. 政府新质生产力关注与城乡收入差距[J].经济评论,2025,(4):58-75.