|
|
|
| The Topic Transformation and Practical Implementation of Rural Life Governance：A Narration of People's Livelihood in the Context of Agricultural Population Moving to Cities |
| WU Ye-miao |
| School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Life governance is an essential component of rural governance, which is related to whether rural residents can have a good life. How to improve the livelihood and raise the living standard of rural residents in rural life governance is a significant theoretical and practical issue. Rural society serves as both a productive entity and a living space, necessitating a governance approach that balances production governance and life governance. Comparatively speaking, both central and local governments have prioritized production governance over life governance, even regarding matters related to agricultural production as “public affairs” and those related to rural family life as “private matters”, and get less involved in them. In the new era, rural governance should not only emphasize production governance, but also highlight the significance of life governance. While addressing the “difficultly” and “poorly” handled trivial issues in daily life, efforts should be made to handle the increasingly severe life problems caused by the migration of agricultural population to cities for work and home purchases, as well as changes in agricultural business entities under the context of urbanization. The continuous migration of the agricultural population to cities hinders the improvement of rural life and creates tension in the construction of rural life order in rural revitalization, making the livelihood issues in rural residents' lives, such as employment, housing, education, elderly care, and medical care, increasingly prominent. Therefore, the governance of rural life should take improving people's livelihood as the core issue. Based on the new situations and problems of people's livelihood needs in rural society, the shortcomings of people's livelihood should be made up in practice to ensure that rural residents can lead a harmonious and beautiful life that is suitable for work, living, upbringing, education, and healthcare.
|
|
Received: 20 August 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平. 坚持把解决好“三农”问题作为全党工作重中之重,举全党全社会之力推动乡村振兴[J].求是,2022,(7):4-15.
[2] 鲁芳. 新中国成立以来日常生活的变迁及日常生活伦理构建面临的难题[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2020,(3):85-92.
[3] 刘锐. 农村生活治理:何以可能与何以可为[J].思想战线,2023,(4):107-116.
[4] 孙中山选集(下)[M]孙中山选集(下)[M].北京:人民出版社,2011.832.
[5] 费孝通. 乡土中国生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.7.
[6] 孙九霞,张凌媛.县域城乡融合发展的“双生论”理论框架与关键议题[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(1):129-138.
[7] 史敬棠,等.中国农业合作化运动史料(上册)[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1957.63.
[8] (德)斐迪南·滕尼斯.共同体与社会——纯粹社会学的基本概念[M].张巍卓译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.71-72.
[9] 田孟. 制度变迁中的中国乡村治理生活化转向[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,(4):15-25.
[10] 马流辉. 大都市郊区乡村治理的生活转向及其实践机制 ——以上海市为例[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2023,(6):170-182.
[11] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.社会的构成:结构化理论大纲[M].李康,李猛译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.42.
[12] (英)齐格蒙特·鲍曼.共同体:在一个不确定的世界中寻找安全[M].欧阳景根译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2003.3.
[13] 折晓叶. 合作与非对抗性抵制——弱者的“韧武器”[J].社会学研究,2008,(3):1-28.
[14] 卢晖临,粟后发.迈向扎根的城镇化——以浏阳为个案[J].开放时代,2021,(4):158-177+9.
[15] 徐勇. 农民理性的扩张:“中国奇迹”的创造主体分析 ——对既有理论的挑战及新的分析进路的提出[J].中国社会科学,2010,(1):103-118.
[16] 吴业苗. 农民消费空间转向及其对“人的城镇化”的作用[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(6):20-29.
[17] 贺雪峰. 新乡土中国[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013. 116.
[18] 吴业苗. 城乡公共服务一体化的理论与实践[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.1.
[19] 邓大才. 社会化小农:动机与行为[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,(3):9-16.
[20] 陈军亚.韧性小农:历史延续与现代转换——中国小农户的生命力及自主责任机制[J].中国社会科学,2019,(12):82-99.
[21] 潘璐. “小农”思潮回顾及其当代论辩[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(2):34-48.
[22] 张红宇.大国小农:迈向现代化的历史抉择[J].求索,2019,(1):68-75.
[23] 饶旭鹏. 国外农户经济研究理论述评[J].学术界,2010,(10):206-216.
[24] 毛泽东. 毛泽东选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.934.
[25] Kay C.Rural Poverty and Development Strategies in Latin America[J].Journal of Agrarian Change,2006,6(4):455-508.
[26] Zhang Q F, Donaldson J A.From Peasants to Farmers: Peasant Differentiation, Labor Regimes, and Landrights Institutions in China's Agrarian Transition[J].Politics & Society, 2010,38(4):458-489.
[27] 赵丹. 教育均衡视角下农村教师资源配置的现实困境及改革对策——小规模和大规模学校的对比研究[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,(5):156-163.
[28] 齐燕. 过度教育城镇化:形成机制与实践后果——基于中西部工业欠发达县域的分析[J].北京社会科学,2020,(3):59-69.
[29] 邹志辉. 城乡教育一体化:问题形态与制度突破[J].教育研究,2012,(8):19-24.
[30] 陆益龙. 后乡土中国[M].北京:商务印书馆,2017.191.
[31] 贺雪峰. 城市化的中国道路[M].北京:东方出版社,2014. 13-63.
[32] 张曙光. 中国城市化道路的是非功过[J].学术月刊,2015,(7):42-49.
[33] 田先红,吕德文.“生活国家”的构建:中国国家建设的历史进程与基本经验——以乡村生活治理为讨论中心[J].社会科学,2023,(4):152-166.
[34] 梁漱溟全集(第5卷)[M]梁漱溟全集(第5卷)[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2005. 338.
[35] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.民族-国家与暴力[M].胡宗泽,赵力涛译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.11.
[36] 王向阳. 国家如何引领私人生活的变革——基于近年来农民生活治理实践的考察[J].上海行政学院学报,2021,(5):14-23.
[37] 吴业苗. 农村基层社会管理与“社区化”体制建构——基于城乡一体化视角[J].社会科学,2013,(8):76-83.
[38] (瑞典)欧维·洛夫格伦,乔纳森·弗雷克曼.美好生活:中产阶级的生活史[M].赵丙祥,罗杨等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.49.
[39] 叶敬忠,刘娟,等.农民视角的乡村振兴(上)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2022.50.
[40] 郑功成. 以人民为中心:新时代中国民生保障[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.36. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
