清代礼学复兴及其经世走向

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (589 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The revival of ritual studies in the Qing Dynasty was the result of correcting the empty and sparse academic style of the late Ming Dynasty, responding to the call for Confucianism's own “purification” and social morality, and the comprehensive effect of the Qing government's policy of stabilizing public opinion. Looking at the history of ritual studies in the Qing Dynasty over the past two hundred years, “textual research” and “learning from the world” are two parallel development paths, and “mutual verification of the three rituals” is its unique characteristic. In the 19th century, the pursuit of the practical application of ritual studies reached its peak. This is not only a response of academic research to social changes, but also a need for the development of ritual studies themselves. The research on ritual studies in the Qing Dynasty was fruitful, with empirical evidence of ancient classic ritual systems, verified Confucian ritual texts, highlighted social functions of ritual classics in the process of organization, research, and dissemination, and excavated cultural functions of ritual studies serving society. But there are also some shortcomings: although emphasizing the maintenance of Confucian epistemological empiricism, it does not take into account the “theoretical distortion” of ritual studies constructed by Song and Ming Neo Confucian scholars through metaphysics; Although advocating for governing the classics and seeking righteousness, there is an excessive emphasis on bringing the theoretical form of ritual studies back to social reality, resulting in a lack of enthusiasm for pursuing righteousness on the basis, and thus failing to find a good balance between academia and reality.

Key words： Qing Dynasty Li Xue examination and certification epistemology the direction of the world modernization transformation

Received: 10 May 2024

PACS:

B249

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	KANG Yu

Cite this article:

KANG Yu. On the Revival of Ritual Studies in the Qing Dynasty and Its Historical Trend[J]. , 2024, 41(5): 151-159.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I5/151

[1] 梁启超. 中国近三百年学术史[A].梁启超全集(第12集) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[2] 邓声国. 清代《仪礼》学史[M].北京:人民出版社,2020.2.
[3] (美)周启荣.清代儒家礼教主义的兴起——以伦理道德、儒学经典和宗族为切入点的考察[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2017.
[4] 张寿安. 十八世纪礼学考证的思想活力:礼教论争与礼秩重省[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[5] 邓声国. 清代《仪礼》学史[M].北京:人民出版社,2020.
[6] 潘斌. 清代“三礼”诠释研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2021.
[7] (美)周启荣.儒家礼教思潮的兴起与清代考证学[M].南京:南京师范大学学报,2011,(3),7.
[8] 清实录(第3册)[M].北京:中华书局. 1985.99.
[9] (清)顾炎武.与施愚山书[A].顾亭林诗文集(卷3)[M].北京:中华书局,1983.58.
[10] (清)顾炎武.答汪苕文书[A].顾亭林诗文集(卷3)[M].北京:中华书局,1983.60.
[11] (清)顾炎武.与毛锦卫[A].顾亭林诗文集(卷6)[M].北京:中华书局,1983.141.
[12] (清)顾炎武.与人书九[A].顾亭林诗文集(卷4)[M].北京:中华书局,1983.93.
[13] (清)汪琬.答顾宁人先生书[A].钝翁续稿(卷12) [A].清代诗文集汇编(九四)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011. 573.
[14] (清)凌廷堪.复礼上[A].校礼堂文集(卷4)[M].北京:中华书局,1998.27.
[15] (清)凌廷堪.复礼下[A].校礼堂文集(卷4)[M].北京:中华书局,1998.31.
[16] 张寿安. 以礼代理——凌廷堪与清中叶儒学思想之转变[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001.157.
[17] (清)张成孙.答方彦闻书[A].端虚勉一居文集[A].张舜徽编.张舜徽集·清人文集别录[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2004.396.
[18] (清)姚际恒.仪礼通论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.1998.7.
[19] (清)陈澧.东塾集[A].近代中国史料丛刊一辑[M].台北:台湾文海出版社景印清光绪十八年菊坡精舍刻本,1966.
[20] (清)缪荃孙.中书衔处州府学教授黄先生墓志铭[A].续碑传集(卷75) [A].近代中国史料丛刊一辑[M].台北:台湾文海出版社景印江楚编书局宣统二年刊本,1966.
[21] (清)曾国藩.孙芝房侍讲刍论序[A].曾文正公全集(第10册) [M].北京:同心出版社,2014.
[22] (清)张之洞.劝学篇[A].近代中国史料丛刊一辑[M].台北:台湾文海出版社景印清光绪二十四年中江书院刻本,1966.
[23] 梁启超. 清代学术概论[A].梁启超全集(第10集) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.287.
[24] (清)俞樾.何崃青五经典林序[A].春在堂杂文续编(卷2) [A].近代中国史料丛刊一辑[M].台北:台湾文海出版社景印光绪二十五年春在堂全书本,1966.
[25] (清)皮锡瑞.经学通论·三礼[M].北京:中华书局. 2017. 276.
[26] 刘永青. 清代礼学研究特点[J].齐鲁学刊. 2008,(3),24.
[27] 世宗宪皇帝御制大清律集解序[A].大清律例·卷首[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆景印文渊阁四库全书(第672册),1984.
[28] (清)孙诒让.周礼正义·卷首[M].北京:中华书局,1987.5.
[29] 宋育仁. 采风记[A].宋育仁卷(中国近代思想家文库) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.35.