我国国际商事调解特区立法：问题争议、解决机制及制度贡献

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (577 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract With the progressive advancement of China's international engagement, the pace of legal practices pertaining to international commercial mediation and the exploration of relevant mechanisms in various free trade zones has accelerated. However, certain prevailing challenges persist, including the absence of specialized legislation for commercial mediation, vagueness in legal nature of mediation institutions, impediments in enforcement, and lack of review standards for cross-border enforcement. The recently enacted Regulations on the Diversified Resolution of Conflicts and Disputes in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, as a local legislative instrument, has spearheaded the introduction of specific regulations addressing commercial mediation, henceforth establishing a fundamental legal framework for mediation in Shenzhen. Particularly noteworthy is its innovative approach towards international commercial mediation, manifested through the establishment of mechanisms such as Early Neutral Evaluation, preservation in mediation and judicial confirmation which facilitate the efficiency of mediation. The exploratory, pioneering and systematic construction of the legislation for international commercial mediation has provided China with the entry into force of the “Singapore Mediation Convention” and the development of an international commercial mediation system with Chinese characteristics in three aspects: legislative concept, clause design, and practical application. It is an important preliminary system reference and experience exploration, and in a sense, it has also contributed to the Chinese solution to the perfection and development of the international commercial mediation system worldwide.

Key words： international commercial mediation legislation in Special Economic Zone settlement agreement Singapore Convention on Mediation cross-border enforceability

Received: 20 March 2023

PACS:	D92
	D299

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	GUO Zi-ping

Cite this article:

GUO Zi-ping. China's Special Zone Legislation for International Commercial Mediation: Disputes, Settlement Mechanisms and Institutional Contributions[J]. , 2023, 40(4): 13-13.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I4/13

[1] 疏义红,刘乐阳.让仲裁为司法分忧[N].人民法院报,2020-08-29(02).
[2] 刘晓红. 论我国民商事纠纷多元化解决机制的现代化[J].东方法学,2023,(2):162-178.
[3] 熊浩.语境论视野下的《新加坡调解公约》与中国商事调解立法:以调解模式为中心[J].法学家,2022,(6):17-30+191.
[4] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N].人民日报,2022-10-26(001).
[5] 成阳. 管辖与执行:多元解纷体系中商事调解制度疑难问题研究[A].上海市法学会.《上海法学研究》集刊2022年第17卷——长三角法治论坛文集[C].2023.75-88.
[6] 祁壮. 国际商事调解发展的新趋势与我国的应对[J].江西社会科学,2023,43(2):193-205.
[7] 蔡依莹.中国东盟(澳门)仲裁协会理事会主席赖建国:谱写粤澳商事调解新篇,打造更优营商环境[ED/OL].http://www.21jingji.com/article/20220121/herald/00e6bc626c9605a2705f2215ab42b5aa.html,2022-12-21.
[8] 肖滨,戴少斌.判决抑或调解——基层法官行为选择的政治学分析[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2022,62(5):45-58+236.
[9] 李占国. 诉源治理的理论、实践及发展方向[J].法律适用,2022,(10):3-16.
[10] 柳杰.拓展多元解纷新路径推动矛盾纠纷实质化解——最高人民法院办理建议提案情况系列综述之五[N].人民法院报,2022-03-11(03).
[11] 王治国.上海浦东自贸区司法保障的“精神内核”[N].人民法院报,2017-01-23(05).
[12] 费宁,赵芳,陈菁菁.中国商事调解年度观察(2022)[ED/OL].https://www.bjac.org.cn/news/view?id=4414,2022-11-07.
[13] 王芳. 中国商事调解这十年:紧跟时代砥砺奋进探索创新谱写华章[J].中国对外贸易,2022,(10):26-29.
[14] 范愉. 自贸区建设与纠纷解决机制的创新[J].法治研究,2017,(1):82-88.
[15] 王宇石. 我国自由贸易试验区商事调解制度的优化与创新——以《新加坡公约》为背景[J].求索,2022,(5):170-178.
[16] 崔善红.营造法治化国际化便利化营商环境——海南涉外民商事法庭和海口知识产权法庭保障海南自贸区(港)建设纪实[ED/OL].https://www.court.gov.cn/fuwu-xiangqing-211041.html,2022-12-19.
[17] 刘晓惠,邓海宁.海南法院探索国际商事调解新模式[ED/OL].https://www.hainan.gov.cn/hainan/5309/202207/559c4021ce3145b8bc4fa7b73ac1e44c.shtml,2022-10-04.
[18] 联合国贸易法委员会.贸易法委员会国际商事调解和调解所产生的国际和解协议示范法(2018年修正,简称《国际商事调解示范法》)[ED/OL].https://uncitral.un.org/zh/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_conciliation/status,2023-01-20.
[19] Rodney L. Lewis. Mediation in USA[ED/OL].https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1afc5951-1db6-4f91-8e3b-500022484dbd,2022-09-09.
[20] 刘静. 论一站式国际商事纠纷解决平台下的商事调解制度——以《新加坡调解公约》为视角[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2023,38(3):118-130.
[21] 司法部.关于政协十三届全国委员会第三次会议第3546号提案答复的函[ED/OL].http://www.moj.gov.cn/p-ub/sfbgw/zwxxgk/fdzdgknr/fdzdgknrjyta/202012/t20201231_20 8302.html,2021-12-31.
[22] David I.Levine. Early Neutral Evaluation: The Second Phase[M].Journal of Dispute Resolution,1989.2.
[23] David I.Levine. Northern District of California adopts Early Neutral Evaluation to Expedite Dispute Resolution[J].Judicature,1989,72(4):235-238.
[24] 江和平,黄琪.民商事纠纷中立评估机制的中国发展之路[J].法律适用,2015,(7):22-27.
[25] 周建华. 商事调解立法体系的递进式构建研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):161-168.
[26] 崔军,张宗浩.关于《深圳经济特区矛盾纠纷多元化解条例》中商事调解制度浅见——以知识产权争议解决为例[ED/OL].http://www.ccpitsz.org.cn/mtbd/content/post_803285.html,2022-04-29.
[27] 伊宵鸿.深圳积极探索商事调解新机制[ED/OL].https://k.sina.com.cn/article_1913382117_720be4e502001fxy7.html,2023-03-02.
[28] 深圳市南山区司法局.探索人民调解与商事调解的协同发展与创新——以南山区民商事纠纷多元化解为视角[ED/OL].http://sf.sz.gov.cn/ztzl/fzszjs/fzsdy/content/post_10035036.html,2022-08-19.