我国数字文化产业政策的演进脉络、阶段特征与发展趋势

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (28)
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (894 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The development of industrial practice and the change of industrial policy are complementary with each other. A glimpse of the evolution trajectory and characteristics of each stage of the digital cultural industry policy helps further understanding the development process of the digital cultural industry and predict its future trends. The observation of China’s digital cultural industry policy from 1994 to 2021 reveals that the changes of China’s digital cultural industry policy can be divided into four stages: the budding stage, the initial stage, the development stage, and the mature stage. Over the years, the policies share certain general features: great in quantity; a wide range of subjects, and increasingly stronger effects. The analysis of the key words of the policies and semantic networks show the characteristics of the policy themes of the four stages are respectively as follows: the theme of the first stage is restrictive regulation and information infrastructure construction; the theme of the second stage is service management and support for important businesses; the theme of the third stage is reinforcement of incentive and innovation; the theme of the fourth stage is the whole industry chain construction and high-quality development. The semantic networks of the four stages are respectively represented by such highly relevant phrases as“operation-license”,“management-service”,“development-technology” and “development-culture”, which reflect the focus of policies in different stages. On the whole, China’s digital cultural industry policies show the following trend: in terms of policy subjects, the coordination among many departments are replacing independent regulation of a few departments; in terms of policy orientation, incentive development is replacing restrictive regulation; in terms of the policy language, it has changed from vague and weak to comprehensive and strong.

Key words： digital cultural industry policy policy text policy characteristics evolution trajectory development trend

Received: 10 September 2022

PACS:

G124

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Geng
	LIN Jia-wen

Cite this article:

CHEN Geng,LIN Jia-wen. Evolution Context, Stage Characteristics and Development Trend of China’s Digital Culture Industry Policy[J]. , 2022, 39(6): 40-51.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V39/I6/40

[1] König PD. Signs of Convergence in Party Policies on Digital Technologies. A Comparative Analysis of Party Policy Stances in Ireland and Germany[J].Journal of Infor-mation Technology & Politics,2019,16(2):137-153.
[2] Casemajor N,Bellavance G,Sirois G.Cultural Participation in Digital Environments: Goals and Stakes for Quebec Cultural Policies[J].International Journal of Cultural Policy,2021,27(5):650-666.
[3] Novella-Camara.AM, Romero-Perez C, Noguera-Pigem E. Children’s Participation, Local Policy and the Digital Environment: Visions and Uses Among Spanish Munici-Palities[J].Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal,2021,29(69):31-41.
[4] Christian Haddad,Clemens Binder.Governing Through Cybersecurity: National Policy Strategies, Globalized (in-)Security and Sociotechnical Visions of The Digital Socie-ty[J]. sterreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie,2019,44(1):115-134.
[5] Hanania L R.Cultural Action in the EU External Com-mercial Policy:Securing the Specificity of Cultural Goods and Services in The Digital Era[J].Politique Europeenne,2017,56(2):124-145.
[6] Wenhui Fu, Nam, & Young-Ho. Analysis of The Chinese Cultural Industry Policy for Supporting Korean Digital Co-ntents Firms[J].Journal of North-east Asian Cultures,2016, 48:225-244.
[7] Sharma,Ravi S, Samuel, Ekundayo M, Ng, Elaine W J. Beyond the Digital Divide: Policy Analysis for Knowledge Societies[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2009,13(5):373-386.
[8] Vivanco, Georgina and Gorostiaga, Jorge. Digital Culture and Diversity: Perspectives of Discourses on ICT-Educa-tion Policies[J].Cadernos de Pesquisa,2017,47(165):1016-1043.
[9] 龙莉,蔡尚伟,严昭柱.中国互联网文化产业政策研究(1994-2015)[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2016.37-58.
[10] 毕绪龙. 数字文化产业政策的六个关注点[J].人文天下,2018,(10):2-4.
[11] 周格非,周庆山.我国数字内容产业政策的内容分析与完善策略[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(10):11-18.
[12] 尹达,杨海平.我国数字内容产业政策法规体系和运行保障机制研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(23):19-22+10.
[13] 王风云,牛盼强.甘肃数字内容产业发展政策研究[J].甘肃社会科学,2013,(5):104-108.
[14] 胥力伟,丁芸.助推数字文化产业高质量发展的税收政策优化[J].税务研究,2021,(11):115-118.
[15] 高薇华. 中国动漫产业政策的实施效果与展望[J].传媒,2008,(3):20-23.
[16] 周莉. 长三角一体化进程中江苏网络游戏产业的创新发展路径研究[J].现代管理科学,2021,(4):112-120.
[17] (捷克斯洛伐克)卡莱尔·科西克.具体的辩证法——关于人与世界问题的研究[M].刘玉贤译.哈尔滨:黑龙江大学出版社,2015.117.
[18] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.党政机关公文处理工作条例[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2013-02/22/content_2640088. htm,2018-02-22.
[19] 崔璐,申珊,杨凯瑞.中国政府现行科技金融政策文本量化研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020,(4):162-171.
[20] 王钦,李凡,李乾文.科技政策审计的语义网络分析[J].财会月刊,2020,(7):97-102.
[21] 李少惠,王婷.我国公共文化服务政策的演进脉络与结构特征——基于139份政策文本的实证分析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(2):57-67.
[22] (美)小约瑟夫·斯图尔特等.公共政策导论(第三版)[M].韩红译.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2011.126.
[23] 范周. 重构·颠覆文化产业变革中的互联网精神[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2016.23-35.
[24] 周城雄,周庆山.我国数字内容产业政策演变及分析[J].学习与实践,2013,(12):115-123.
[25] 陆地,陈学会.中国网络文化产业发展报告[M].北京:新华出版社,2010.345.
[26] 陈家泽. 政府作用与文化产业政策设计[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(5):86-92.
[27] 王长松,何雨,杨矞.中国文化产业政策演进研究(2002-2016)[J].南京社会科学,2018,(7):133-142.
[28] 陈开举. 话语权的文化学研究[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2012.177-179.