儒学哲学化的契机：以分析哲学为传统中国哲学开生面

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (500 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper advocates philosophizing Confucianism with the approach of analytic philosophy. In China, Chinese classics are taught in Chinese literature, history and philosophy departments, but philosophers need to treat the texts differently from those other disciplines. In other words, Chinese philosophers should engage with Chinese classics philosophically. To do so in the contemporary philosophical world, we need to employ Western philosophical analysis to reconstruct traditional Confucianism. The language and the topics in Western analytic philosophy may not help improve the substance of Chinese philosophy; nevertheless, but it is an indispensable tool, a language skill, which can aid communication of ideas. If Confucianism cannot get out of its inner circle and let the Western philosophical world see its diverse thinking modes and ideas, then it will not be able to draw research interest from newcomers. Only when more and more people are willing to enter the circle of Chinese philosophy will the field thrive with renewed energy. If, on the other hand, Chinese philosophers stay within their own circles, engage in discussions only with insiders, the circle of Chinese philosophy will be stagnant, constricted, and eventually become merely a decoration in some remote corner of world philosophy.

Key words： analytic philosophy Confucianism comparative philosophy philosophical methodology

Received: 10 August 2015

PACS:

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Ji-lu

Cite this article:

LIU Ji-lu. Revitalizing Traditional Chinese Philosophy with the Analytic Approach: The Case of “Philosophizing” Confucianism[J]. , 2016, 33(1): 5-12.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2016/V33/I1/5

[1] 方朝辉.文明重建,中西学术与儒学的转型[J].哲学动态,2007,（5）：12-15.
[2] 杨国荣. 中国哲学研究的四大问题[J].哲学动态,2003,（3）：12-16.
[3] 景海峰. 当代中国哲学的叙述脉络与融通取向[J].社会科学,2012,（2）：139-146.
[4] 李景林. 儒学未来发展之展望[J].哲学动态,2007,（5）：7-11.
[5] 林安梧,欧阳康,邓晓芒,郭齐勇. 中国哲学的未来：中国哲学、西方哲学、马克思主义哲学的交流与互动（上）（下）[J].学术月刊,2007,（4）：27-36,（5）：26-33.
[6] 王夫之.尚书引义[M].台北：河洛图书出版社,1975.55.
[7] 景海峰. 以制度化为背景的中国哲学建构[J].学术月刊, 2007,（3）: 59-61.
[8] 景海峰. 中国哲学研究的范式变化与前景探索[J].文史哲, 2009,（5）: 13-19.
[9] 李晨阳. 北美学界对中国哲学的分析和比较研究——论一个兴起的潮流[J].南京大学学报,2006,（2）：103-110.
[10] 彭国翔.合法性,视域与主体性[J].江汉论坛,2003,（7）: 9-11.
[11] 彭国翔.中国哲学研究方法论的再反思——“援西入中”及其两种模式[J].南京大学学报,2007,（4）：77-87.
[12] 刘笑敢. “反向格义”与中国哲学研究的困境——以老子之道的诠释为例[J].南京大学学报,2006,（2）：76-90.
[13] Jiang, Xinyan. The Study of Chinese Philosophy in the English Speaking World[J].Philosophy Compass ,2011, 168-179.
[14] M·llgaard, Eske. Eclipse of Reading: on the “Philosoph-ical Turn” of American Sinology[J].Dao: A Journal of Com-parative Philosophy, 2005, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2005, 321-340.
[15] Jones, Kile.Analytic versus Continental Philosophy[J]. Philosophy Now 74, 2009, 8-11(https://philosophynow.org/issues/74/Analytic_versus_Continental_Philosophy).
[16] Engel, Pascal. Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Norms[J]. Monist 82, no. 2, 1999, 218-34.
[17] Levy, Neil. Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explain-ing the Differences[J].Metaphilosophy 34:3, 2003, 284-304.