|
|
|
| The Historical Evolution, Core Implications, and Practical Path of the Scientific Thesis That “New Quality Productive Forces Are Inherently Green Productive Forces” |
| WU Guo-lin1,2, MENG Zhen1 |
1. School of Marxism,South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510641; 2. Institute for Advanced Study in Science, Technology and Philosophy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510641 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The scientific thesis that “new quality productive forces are inherently green productive forces” is an important innovative achievement of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era in the field of ecological civilization. It reveals the intrinsic unity between economic development and ecological civilization construction in the process of Chinese modernization. From the perspective of historical evolution, the Party’s initial exploration of the intrinsic correlation between economic development and the green development approach laid the foundation for the formation of this scientific proposition. During his local governance practice, Xi Jinping further deepened the understanding of the coordinated relationship between economic growth and environmental protection, thereby providing valuable practical experience for the theoretical formulation of this proposition. Since the advent of the new era, the systematic elaboration on the relationship between productive forces and green modes of production has promoted the institutional and systemic development of this scientific proposition. From the core essence perspective, “new quality productive forces” and “green productive forces” share inherent consistency in terms of innovation, coordination, and sustainability. Specifically, “greening” and “new-quality” respectively embody the requirements of the law of productive forces development and the pursuit of purposefulness. At a deeper level, the dialectical unity of the “ecologization” of new quality productive forces and the “modernization” of green productive forces highlights the civilizational connotation of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, marking the historic transformation of Chinese-style modernization from industrial civilization to ecological civilization. From the perspective of practical paths, this assertion demands that we should be guided by the concept of green development, be driven by green technological innovation, and be supported by the construction of a system of institutions. Through the coordinated transformation of concepts, technologies and institutions, we should systematically promote the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development, thereby achieving modernization featuring harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature.
|
|
Received: 20 October 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平在中共中央政治局第十一次集体学习时强调加快发展新质生产力扎实推进高质量发展[N].人民日报,2024-02-02(001). [2] 中共二十届四中全会在京举行[N].人民日报,2025-10-24(001). [3] 黄承梁. 新时代生态文明建设思想概论[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.23. [4] 毛泽东文集(第7卷)[M] 毛泽东文集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1999.34. [5] 周生贤. 环保惠民优化发展——党的十六大以来环境保护工作发展回顾(2002—2012)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 23. [6] 江泽民文选(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.534. [7] 胡锦涛文选(第3卷)[M] 胡锦涛文选(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2016.6. [8] 中共国家林业和草原局党组.筑牢祖国北疆绿色长城[J].求是,2024,(7):62-67. [9] 黄承梁,任亮,李惠茹,等.美丽河北:习近平生态文明思想的正定溯源及实践探索[J].治理现代化研究,2025,41(1):89-96. [10] 中共中央党史和文献研究院.深入学习贯彻习近平生态文明思想,以美丽中国建设全面推进人与自然和谐共生的现代化——学习《习近平生态文明文选》第一卷[N].人民日报,2025-07-29(006). [11] 曹普. 中国改革开放全景录(中央卷)(下)[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.183. [12] 习近平. 之江新语[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007.153. [13] 何爱平,任亚兵.从“两山”理念到“绿色生产力”——习近平生态文明思想的创新发展和现实指向[J].人文杂志,2025,(8):1-11. [14] 中共中央党史和文献研究院.十九大以来重要文献选编(上)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2019.53. [15] 习近平外交演讲集(第2卷)[M] 习近平外交演讲集(第2卷)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2022.345. [16] 加快形成新质生产力[N].人民日报,2023-11-24(009). [17] 习近平在参加江苏代表团审议时强调因地制宜发展新质生产力[N].人民日报,2024-03-06(001). [18] 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J].求是,2024,(11):4-8. [19] 张云飞. 发展绿色生产力的科学理念及其实现[J].思想理论教育导刊,2025,(3):13-22. [20] 杨新铭,刘永琦.新质生产力理论的研究重点与方向[J].学习与探索,2025,(9):11-20+2. [21] 周文,李吉良.新质生产力引领人类文明新形态:生成逻辑与文明超越[J].中国人民大学学报,2024,38(4):31-44. [22] 朱亭锦,郭丽双.生态政治经济学视域下的新质生产力:理论溯源、现实机理与实践进路[J].贵州社会科学,2025,(8):28-35. [23] 马克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M] 马克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 928-929. [24] 宁琳琳.“新质生产力本身就是绿色生产力”的学理化阐释[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,(4):50-60+169-170. [25] 刘耀彬,胡伟辉.绿色生产力的形成逻辑、鲜明特征与实践指向[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2025,24(2):38-49. [26] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 602. [27] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 998. [28] 柳思,董军.科技创新视域下新质生产力的生态要素研究——对“新质生产力本身就是绿色生产力”的思考[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2025,31(2):303-316. [29] 习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M] 习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2017. 197. [30] 习近平著作选读(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2023. 604. [31] 孙琳,葛燕燕,姜姝.绿色发展理念驱动中国式现代化的辩证法研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(3):11-20. [32] 黄建洪. 绿色发展理念:绿色经济社会治理的新范式[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(4):48-57. [33] 俞海,宁晓巍.绿色生产力的理论探究与实践进路[J].北京行政学院学报,2025,(1):31-40. [34] 胡长生,安晓星.绿色生产力的理论基础、核心意涵与发展路向[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2025,24(1):14-26+125. [35] 朱香敏. 新质生产力——理论与实践研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2024.57. [36] 刘同舫.论新质生产力的发展动力[J].哲学动态,2025,(3):5-14+175. [37] 生态环境部.美丽中国建设学习读本[M].北京:人民出版社,2024.226. [38] 潘中祥,单胜道.以绿色低碳发展赋能美丽中国建设[J].红旗文稿,2025,(6):45-48. [39] 孙佑海.以习近平生态文明思想引领生态环境法典编纂[J].现代法学,2025,47(2):78-92+217. [40] 方世南. 论新质生产力理念蕴含的生态文明思想[J].思想理论教育,2025,(2):36-42. [41] 周鑫,张满银.“新质生产力本身就是绿色生产力”论断的逻辑要义、内涵意蕴与实践路径[J].生态文明研究,2025,(2):14-24. |
|
|
|