|
|
|
| Bidirectional Driving: The Rule of Law Approach to the Adjustment of the Relationship between the Government and the Market in A High-level Market Economic System |
| CHI Cheng |
| School of Marxism, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract How to handle the relationship between the government and the market has always been the core issue in China's economic restructuring. In the current process of building a high-level socialist market economic system, there are still many problems and challenges in the interaction between the government and the market, including market mechanism failures triggered by multiple factors and systemic obstacles in government regulation. With the dual functions of protecting rights and controlling power, the rule of law can shape the institutional framework and governance mechanism required for the development of the socialist market economy, and thus should serve as the regulator of the “two-way drive” between the government and the market. On the one hand, it is necessary to further elevate the market's position, drive the government to formulate and better implement legal systems, realize the effective integration and driving role of market demand in government behavior, and promote the shaping of a “proactive government”. On the other hand, the government should strengthen the rule of law's role in regulating and guaranteeing economic development in four aspects: political guidance, institutional support, service innovation, and systemic impetus, so as to facilitate the organic integration of an “effective market” and a “proactive government”. Through these efforts, we can achieve a higher-level and higher-quality government-market interaction in the process of building a high-level market economic system, give full play to the dual advantages of China's socialist system and the market economy, accelerate the formation of a new development pattern, promote high-quality development, and provide strong impetus and institutional guarantees for the Chinese path to modernization.
|
|
Received: 31 May 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报,2024-07-22(002).
[2] 马克思恩格斯全集(第19卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1963. 422-423.
[3] (美)詹姆斯·M.布坎南.自由市场和国家[M].桑伍,曾获,吴良健译.北京:北京经济学院出版社,1988.23.
[4] (美)查尔斯·沃尔夫.市场或政府——权衡两种不完善的选择/兰德公司的一项研究[M].谢旭译.北京:中国发展出版社,1994.23.
[5] 刘戒骄. 数据垄断形成机制与监管分析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(1):71-83.
[6] 孙晋.数字平台的反垄断监管[J].中国社会科学,2021,(5):101-127+206-207.
[7] 蔡恒进,郭震.新时期金融支持民营企业发展的困境及对策[J].河南社会科学,2019,27(8):59-64.
[8] 夏英,张瑞涛.农村集体产权制度改革:创新逻辑、行为特征及改革效能[J].经济纵横,2020,(7):59-66.
[9] (美)戈登·塔洛克.公共选择—戈登·塔洛克论文集[M].柏克,郑景胜译.北京:商务印书馆,2011.28.
[10] 崔吕萍,李元丽.全国政协委员刘尚希:宏观调控要避免“三化”[N].人民政协报,2020-10-27(005).
[11] 项波. 双循环新发展格局下宏观调控的法治化向度[J].甘肃社会科学,2021,(4):191-198.
[12] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[13] 靳浩辉,常青.习近平倡导的“亲”“清”新型政商关系:权力与资本良性互动的指南针[J].学习论坛,2017,33(4):16-19.
[14] 毛昭晖,朱星宇.新型腐败的特征与类型——警惕传统型腐败向新型腐败的嬗变[J].理论与改革,2022,(4):84-98.
[15] 2024年全国纪检监察机关处分88.9万人[N].人民日报,2025-01-11(004).
[16] 中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于全面依法治国论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2015.
[17] 徐俊峰. 社会主义“市场决定性作用论”的衍生逻辑及实践启示[J].当代经济管理,2016,38(3):1-7.
[18] 朱大旗,李蕊.经济法治视阈下政府与市场的协同联动[J].江西社会科学,2015,35(7):165-172.
[19] 完善法治建设规划提高立法工作质量效率为推进改革发展稳定工作营造良好法治环境[N].人民日报,2019-02-26(001).
[20] 蔡新蕾,高山行,杨燕.企业政治行为对原始性创新的影响研究——基于制度视角和资源依赖理论[J].科学学研究,2013,31(2):276-285.
[21] 朱旭峰.中国社会政策变迁中的专家参与模式研究[J].社会学研究,2011,25(2):1-27+243.
[22] 陈健,郭冠清.中国特色政府与市场互动关系的形成和发展[J].经济学家,2022,(7):5-14.
[23] 周黎安. “官场+市场”与中国增长故事[J].社会,2018,38(2):1-45.
[24] 柳彦. 自由贸易协定谈判与中国政商关系转型[J].中国行政管理,2017,(6):80-84.
[25] 胡凤乔,叶杰.新时代的政商关系研究:进展与前瞻[J].浙江工商大学学报,2018,(3):125-132.
[26] 邵传林,张存刚.法治如何影响了企业家精神?[J].经济与管理研究,2016,37(1):89-95.
[27] 中央经济工作会议在北京举行习近平李克强作重要讲话[N].人民日报,2014-12-12(001).
[28] 孙文恺. “法治经济”的理论解读[J].江海学刊,2016,(1):131-136.
[29] 习近平.在企业家座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2020-07-22(002).
[30] 营造稳定公平透明的营商环境加快建设开放型经济新体制[N].人民日报,2020-07-18(001).
[31] 习近平. 论把握新发展阶段、贯彻新发展理念、构建新发展格局[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2021.357.
[32] 马克思恩格斯全集(第25卷)[M]马克思恩格斯全集(第25卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1974.994.
[33] 马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷)[M]马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 971. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
