|
|
|
| Logic and Practical Path of New Quality Productivity for the High-Quality Development of China's Grain Industry |
| ZHANG Heng-ming1,2,3, ZHANG Xin-ting2 |
1. School of Tourism and International Hotel Management, Sanya University, Sanya, Hainan, 572022;
2. School of Economics and Management, Hefei University, Hefei, Anhui, 230022;
3. Institute of Urban Governance, Sanya University, Sanya, Hainan, 572022 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Food security is a crucial cornerstone of national security, as it is related to social stability and people's well-being. The high-quality development of China's grain industry urgently requires empowerment through new quality productivity. At present, a new round of global scientific and technological revolution is profoundly reshaping the modes of agricultural production. In the process of moving toward high-quality development, China's grain industry still faces many constraints, and there is an obvious imbalance in the application of new quality productivity in the grain industry. The lack of R&D investment in the scientific and technological entities has made some key technologies not yet self-controllable. Outdated traditional agricultural equipment restricts the improvement of production efficiency. Weaknesses in rural infrastructure reduce the industrial carrying capacity. The lack of integration between various links of the industrial chain has hindered the development of new formats. A time lag exists between policy implementation and industrial needs. These problems seriously restrict the grain industry from achieving high-quality development. China should solve the above problems from five aspects: technology-driven development, equipment empowerment, infrastructure development, industry integration, and policy establishment. Strengthen the driving force of scientific and technological innovation and enhance the promotion of agricultural technologies; upgrade agricultural equipment and enhance the level of mechanization; upgrade infrastructure and advance information construction; actively develop new formats and promote deep integration between different formats; improve the timeliness of policies and establish a sound supervision system. This all-around and multi-level collaborative promotion strategy not only follows the evolution logic of new quality productivity, but also meets the needs of industrial transformation. It proposes a practical path to ensuring national food security.
|
|
Received: 10 June 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J].求是,2024,(11):4-8.
[2] 杜传忠,李钰葳.强化科技创新能力加快形成新质生产力的机理研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024, 27(1):100-109.
[3] 朱春艳,崔续丹.论新质生产力的内涵、特征与价值意蕴[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(4):31-38.
[4] 高书国. 新时代科教兴国战略的理论与实践创新[J].现代教育管理,2023,(2):22-31.
[5] 杜永红. 基于中国国情的农业全产业链数字化转型路径[J].中国流通经济,2023,(12):36-48.
[6] 叶振宇,郑韬.因地制宜发展新质生产力:基本逻辑与实践路径[J].齐鲁学刊,2024,(5):125-134.
[7] 龚红,常梦月,董姗.突破“卡脖子”技术:技术重组与跨界搜索对企业关键核心技术创新的影响[J].珞珈管理评论,2023,50(5):24-45.
[8] 杨刚,王洁蓉.以现代化产业体系建设加快发展新质生产力[J].理论探讨,2024,(3):160.
[9] 常璇. 加快形成农业新质生产力:理论框架、现实困境与实践进路[J].经济问题,2024,(7):20-28.
[10] 文丰安. 数字经济赋能农业强国建设的路径[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2024,(2):86-94.
[11] 段从宇,胡礼群,张逸闲.中国式现代化进程中教育、科技、人才三者关系的科学识辨与正确处理[J].教育科学,2023,39(2):48-55.
[12] 鲁钊阳,杜雨潼,邓琳钰.数字经济促进乡村产业振兴的影响机理及实证研究[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,23(1):37-51+59.
[13] 葛笑如,周昳涵.数字技术赋能农业高质量发展:机理、模式与路径[J].现代经济探讨,2024,(10):126-132.
[14] 罗铭杰. 新质生产力的生态内涵论析[J].河北经贸大学学报,2024,45(2):11-19.
[15] 文丰安. 中国式现代化进程中新质生产力推动经济社会高质量发展路径探析[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(2):13-23.
[16] 李粤冉,韩晓莉.海南自贸港政府职能转变的理论逻辑——基于134项制度集成创新案例的分析[J].海南热带海洋学院学报,2024,31(1):109-121.
[17] 姜彦坤. 粮食主产区农业新质生产力:水平测度、区域差异及障碍诊断[J].湖北社会科学,2024,(5):97-106.
[18] 吕连生. 安徽推进高质量发展对策研究[J].海岳学刊,2024,(1):1-10. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
