|
|
|
| Obscuration, Normative Gaze, and Structural Void: Technological Inquiry into the Changing Sensory Ecology of Urban Space |
| DENG Zhi-wen |
| School of Literature and Media, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, 437100 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The practical essence of urban space determines that diverse sensory experiences cannot be separated from body involvement, especially embodied communication activities. However, technological obscuration has led to the atrophy of embodied communication and the expansion of technological embodiment. Technological embodied communication narrows the subject's sensory activity domain, and sensory perception becomes a technological existence. Visual space has risen while linguistic and other spaces have shrunk, and there have been abnormal phenomena such as the transition from diversity to unification (with visual and auditory senses dominating) in the sensory ecology, as well as sensory experience distortion. Technological normative gaze and structural void are two practical forms of technological obscuration. Technological normative gaze is mainly implemented through three visual metaphoric ways of architecture, surveillance, and image landscape, which weaken and restrict the embodied communication activities of the subject, strengthen the central position of visual sensory perception, weaken sensory experience, and make sensory experience tend towards uniformity; technological structural void further reduces the frequency of embodied communication, and transportation, communication, and image technologies have achieved the elimination of physical distance and abstract removal of distance in space and time compression and de-territorialization, greatly reducing the opportunities for physical contact and compressing the scope of sensory activities. Desituationalization deprives the sensory experience of its authenticity. Therefore, increasing the possibility of body practice, preserving micro-sensory perception and primary socialization in the technological embodiment is the only choice for building a healthy urban space sensory ecology.
|
|
Received: 30 May 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 吴治平. 空间理论与文学的再现[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,2008.13.
[2] (英)伯特兰·罗素.哲学问题[M].张卜天译.天津:天津人民出版社,2021.4.
[3] 李泽厚. 关于当前美学问题的争论[A].美学论集[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1980.98.
[4] (法)雅克·德里达.声音与现象[M].杜小真译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.97.
[5] (法)加斯东·巴什拉.空间的诗学[M].张逸婧译.上海:上海译文出版社,2013.
[6] (德)马丁·海德格尔.存在的天命:海德格尔技术哲学文选[M].孙周兴编译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2018.
[7] 陈凡,傅畅梅,葛勇义.技术现象学概论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2011.28.
[8] (奥)马赫.感觉的分析[M].洪谦,唐钺,梁志学译.北京:商务印书馆,1985.171.
[9] 舒红跃. 技术与生活世界[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.95.
[10] (加)威廉姆·H·凡登伯格.生活在技术的迷宫中[M].尹文娟,陈凡译.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2015.32.
[11] 谢纳. 空间生产与文化表征——空间转向视阈中的文学研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.42.
[12] H.Lefebvre.The Production of Space[M].Oxford:Blackw-ell Press,1991.
[13] Merleau-Ponty.Phenomenology of Perception[M].London and New York:Routledge,1945.353.
[14] 汪民安,郭晓彦主编.建筑、空间与哲学[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2019.6.
[15] (美)戴安娜·阿克曼.感觉的自然史[M].路但俊译.广州:花城出版社,2007.228.
[16] 汪民安. 感官技术[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[17] (法)莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂.知觉现象学[M].姜志辉译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.300.
[18] 蓝江. 从身体感知到机器感知——数字化时代下感知形式的嬗变[J].西北师范大学学报,2023,(3):13-20.
[19] Albert Borgmann.Mind,Body and World[J].Philosophical Forum,1976,(8):76-79.
[20] Alasdair MacIntyre.After Virtue[M].Indiana:Notre Dame,1981.176.
[21] 包亚明主编.现代性与空间的生产[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.156.
[22] 倪梁康. 缘起与实相——唯识现象学十二讲[M].北京:商务印书馆,2019.107.
[23] (美)唐·伊德.技术与生活世界:从伊甸园到尘世[M].韩连庆译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012.42.
[24] 王妍,张大勇.模仿与虚拟——技术现象学视域下文艺理论基本问题研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2021.51.
[25] (日)三木清.哲学入门[M].陈延,裴蕾译.济南:山东画报出版社,2020.185-189.
[26] (美)唐·伊德.让事物“说话”:后现象学与技术科学[M].韩连庆译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.58.
[27] (美)赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,2014. 9.
[28] Gilbert Simondon.On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects[M].Paris:Orbier Press.1958.127.
[29] (美)爱德华·索亚.第三空间[M].陆扬译.上海:上海教育出版社,2005.148.
[30] 汪民安,陈永国,马海良主编.城市文化读本[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2018.163.
[31] (法)居伊·德波.景观社会[M].王昭风译.南京:南京大学出版社,2006.
[32] (挪)诺伯格-舒尔茨.场所精神:迈向建筑现象学[M].施植明译.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2019.71.
[33] (挪)诺伯格-舒尔茨.建筑——意义和场所[M].黄士均译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.29.
[34] (德)阿诺德·盖伦.技术时代的人类心灵[M].何兆武,何冰译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2008.23.
[35] (美)迈克·迪尔.后现代都市状况[M].李小科译.上海:上海教育出版社,2004.
[36] 汪民安编. 现代性基本读本[M].开封:河南大学出版社,2005.499.
[37] (美)爱德华·索亚.后大都市:城市和区域的批判性研究[M].李均译.上海:上海教育出版社,2006.202.
[38] 张宪丽. 数字世界中的共有凝视:从福柯和拉康出发的思考[J].学习与探索,2022,(12):50-59.
[39] 邓志文.后现代图像景观中的超空间——城市智能视频监控的空间哲学反思[J].文艺理论研究,2022,(4):23-31+42.
[40] (德)韩炳哲.精神政治学[M].关红玉译.北京:中信出版集团,2019.
[41] 孟建主编.图像时代:视觉文化传播的理论诠释[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005.1.
[42] 章戈浩. 可见的思想[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,2008. 15.
[43] (美)肖恩·加拉格尔.现象学导论[M].张浩军译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.96.
[44] Martin Heidegger.The Question Concering Technology,Basic Writings[M].Ed.David F.Krell.New York:Harper and Row,Publishers,1977.295.
[45] (俄)罗津.技术哲学:从埃及金字塔到虚拟现实[M].张艺芳译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2018.181.
[46] 杨庆峰. 现代技术下的空间拉近体验[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2011.
[47] (美)汉娜·阿伦特.人的境况[M].王寅丽译.上海:上海人民出版社,2017.33.
[48] (德)马丁·海德格尔.演讲与论文集[M].孙周兴译.上海:上海三联书店,2005.172.
[49] (德)马丁·海德格尔.林中路[M].孙周兴译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004.91.
[50] (德)格奥尔格·西美尔.货币哲学[M].陈戎女译.北京:华夏出版社,2007.387.
[51] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾译.南京:译林出版社,2022.21.
[52] (荷)托恩·勒迈尔.以敞开的感官享受世界[M].施辉业译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2009.33.
[53] 吴国盛. 技术哲学讲演录[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.229.
[54] 曾国屏. 赛博空间的哲学探索[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.9.
[55] (美)休伯特·德雷福斯.计算机不能做什么[M].宁春岩译.上海:上海三联书店,1986.256.
[56] Albert Borgmann.Technology and Character of Contem-porary Life[M].Chicago and London:the University of Ch-icago Press,1984.209.
[57] 宋保林. 技术哲学榷论[M].北京:新华出版社,2018.22.
[58] (加)安德鲁·芬伯格.在理性与经验之间[M].高海青译.北京:金城出版社,2015.4.
[59] Shoshana Zuboff.In the Age of the Smart Machine:The Future of Work and Power[M].New York:Basic Books,1989. 38.
[60] 姚大志. 身体与技术:德雷福斯技术现象学思想研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2020.176.
[61] (加)安德鲁·芬伯格.技术批判理论[M].韩连庆,曹观法译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.6.
[62] (美)布莱恩·阿瑟.技术的本质[M].曹东溟,王健译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2018.53.
[63] 吴国盛编. 技术哲学经典文本[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2022.
[64] (加)安德鲁·芬伯格.技术体系:理性的社会生活[M].张道根,余信汇译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2018. 189.
[65] 范虹. AI没有未来:技术影像的零度写作与点彩美学[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,(3):152-160. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
