|
|
|
| From Simple Governance to Administrative Leadership: Evolution, Problems and Solutions of Rural Life Governance |
| LIU Rui |
| School of Public Management/Research Center for Social Development & Social Risk Control, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610065 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In recent years, the long-standing tradition of simple governance of life affairs has rapidly turned to bureaucratic governance. The model of simple governance is embedded governance and informal governance based on the publicness of production and the solidarity of relations, the use of favor and face, and the implementation of village community norms. With the de-agriculturalization of production activities, the disintegration of village community value norms, and the weakening of grassroots governance capacity, life affairs are gradually removed from production practice, and the actual performance of simple governance is not obvious. At the same time, to meet the people’s yearning for a better life and comprehensively provide public goods and life services to rural areas, grass-roots organizations must build an administration-led governance model to effectively implement policy tasks, refine policy objectives, strengthen inspection and acceptance, and strengthen incentive assessment. At present, the problem of life governance is that the strong incentive and hard examination of the general politicization leads to the replacement of the goal in the implementation process, which not only fosters the villagers’ notion of “wait, depend and ask for”, but also brings the problem of formalistic governance. Based on the attribute level of life affairs, the governance structure of life affairs is gathered, and it is found that county organizations should have independent governance space, not only at the “collective selection” level to formulate a reasonable assessment system, but also at the “operation level” to provide suitable social norms. To sum up, administrative guidance, empowerment and activation of grass-roots organizations is a sustainable and effective way out of life governance.
|
|
Received: 10 May 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 阎云翔. 私人生活的变革:一个村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系(1949-1999)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006. 252-257.
[2] 贺雪峰. 中国农民价值观的变迁及对乡村治理的影响 ——以辽宁大古村调查为例[J].学习与探索,2007,(5):12-14.
[3] 吕德文. “一家两制”:城乡社会背景下美好生活的实践逻辑[J].探索,2021,(5):115-124.
[4] 杜鹏. 乡村治理的“生活治理”转向:制度与生活的统一[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2021,(6):91-99.
[5] 冯川. 还原论视角下中国农村生活治理的困境及其超越[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(4):181-192.
[6] 刘燕舞.生活治理:分析农村人居环境整治的一个视角[J].求索,2022,(3):116-123.
[7] 熊万胜.社会治理,还是生活治理?——审思当代中国的基层治理[J].文化纵横,2018,(2):115-121.
[8] 刘锐. 农村生活治理:何以可能与何以可为[J].思想战线,2023,(4):107-116.
[9] 朱承. 礼乐文明与生活政治[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(6):100-111.
[10] (美)埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事务的治理之道[M].余逊达,陈旭东译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012.49-59.
[11] (日)寺田浩明.拥挤列车模式:明清时期的社会认识和秩序建构[J].阮云星译.清华法学,2010,(4):166-174.
[12] 费孝通. 乡土中国生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 1998.6-11.
[13] 桂华. 农业专业化背景下乡村治理基础秩序的重塑[J].学术论坛,2022,(4):59-67.
[14] 欧阳静.简约治理:超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J].中国社会科学,2022,(3):145-163.
[15] 陈柏峰. 社会诚信建设与基层治理能力的再造[J].中国社会科学,2022,(5):122-142.
[16] 韩志明. 在模糊与清晰之间——国家治理的信息逻辑[J].中国行政管理,2017,(3):25-30.
[17] 杜姣. 村庄治理层次与村庄秩序供给——兼论国家力量如何进入村庄[J].教学与研究,2023,(2):114-124.
[18] 董磊明,欧阳杜菲.从简约治理走向科层治理:乡村治理形态的嬗变[J].政治学研究,2023,(1):133-146.
[19] 杨华.县乡中国:县域治理现代化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2022.3-18.
[20] 吕德文.国家基石:在基层读懂中国[M].北京:东方出版社,2022.190-195. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
