制度有效性的社会根源及演化路径：基于山西四社五村水权研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (703 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Institutional effectiveness is a key concept in analyzing social development issues. There are at least three basic criteria for the effectiveness of a system, which are duration, equilibrium stability, and self-implementation. The institutional effectiveness that meets these three standards can be revealed from three aspects: geographical environmental, initial generation methods, and subsequent stabilization methods. The special geographical environment determines the scope and results of institutional choices, and institutional initial generation inevitably contains specific violent genes. More importantly, these systems containing violent genes often need to go through a special process of legalization to achieve lasting effectiveness. The legalization of institutions generally includes three paths: textual institutionalization, sanctification of rituals, and stabilization of interest balance. The water distribution system in the Four Communities and Five Villages of Shanxi Province is a typical case that basically meets the three standards of effectiveness system. It spontaneously formed in specific geographical areas and has continued for more than a thousand years, still maintaining vitality to this day. The social root of the effectiveness of this system lies in the relatively remote and arid geographical environment which plays an externally restrictive role, the violent struggles between different villages that led to the formation of the initial institutional framework, and the legal means to continuously stabilize the effectiveness of the system in subsequent development. The means of legalizing the system include the textual implementation of inscriptions and water conservancy books targeting the water distribution system, the sanctification of annual rituals for worshipping the Dragon King, and the balancing of interests through mutual game and compromise among villages.

Key words： institutional effectiveness social origins Four Communities and Five Villages water rights water distribution system legalization of system evolutionary path

Received: 02 April 2024

PACS:

D670

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Sheng-zhong

Cite this article:

LIU Sheng-zhong. The Social Origins and Evolutionary Path of Institutional Effectiveness: A Study Based on the Water Rights of Four Communities and Five Villages in Shanxi Province[J]. , 2024, 41(3): 90-100.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I3/90

[1] (美)V.奥斯特罗姆,D.菲尼,H.皮希特.制度分析与发展的反思:问题与选择[M].王诚等译.北京:商务印书馆,1992.
[2] (美)德隆·阿西莫格鲁,詹姆斯·A.罗宾逊.国家为什么失败[M].李增刚译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2015. 296.
[3] (美)道格拉斯·诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].陈郁等译.上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994.
[4] 董晓萍,(法)蓝克利.不灌而治:山西四社五村水利文献与民俗[M].北京:中华书局,2003.
[5] 祁建民. 自治与他治:近代华北农村的社会和水利秩序[M].商务印书馆,2020.
[6] 董晓萍. 节水水利民俗[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(5):125-133.
[7] 党晓虹. 传统水利规约对北方地区村民用水行为的影响 ——以山西“四社五村”为例[J].兰州学刊,2010,(10):84-90.
[8] 周嘉. 共有产权与乡村协作机制:山西“四社五村”水资源管理研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2018.
[9] 王超宇. 渠长与清至民国五台山地区村落水利制度的演进[J].中国历史地理论丛,2023,(4):98-107.
[10] (美)道格拉斯·诺斯.西方世界的兴起[M].厉以平译.北京:华夏出版社,1999.5.
[11] (德)柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学[M].韩朝华译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.201.
[12] Hannan M.T,Freeman J.Structural Inertia and Organi-zational Change[J].American Sociological Review,1984,49(2):149-164.
[13] (美)兰德尔·卡尔维特.制度的理性选择理论:对设计的意义[A].(美)戴维L.韦默.制度设计[M].费方域,朱宝钦译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004.121.
[14] (美)青木昌彦.比较制度分析[M].周黎安译.上海:上海远东出版社,2001.28.
[15] (美)埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物治理之道.余逊达,陈旭东译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012.49-54.
[16] (美)贾雷德·戴蒙德.枪炮、病菌与钢铁:人类社会的命运[M].谢延光译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,上海译文出版社,2006.449.
[17] (美)道格拉斯·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行译.上海:格致出版社,2008.109.
[18] (美)道格拉斯·诺斯,约瑟夫·瓦利斯,巴里·R·温格斯特.暴力与社会秩序:诠释有文字记载的人类历史的一个概念性框架[M].杭行,王亮译.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2013.341.
[19] (法)让·马克·夸克.合法性与政治[M].佟心平,王远飞译.北京:中央编译出版社,2002.2-3.
[20] (美)斯科特.制度与组织—思想观念与物质利益[M].姚伟,王黎芳译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.68.
[21] Suchman M.C.Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Insti-tutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):571-610.
[22] (法)阿·德芒戎.人文地理学问题[M].葛以德译.北京:商务印书馆,1993.10.
[23] 刘圣中. 文化结构下的制度移植:变革、融合、拒斥与反噬[J].南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2022,(1):52-61.
[24] 钱穆. 中国文化史导论(修订本)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994.1-2.
[25] 张俊峰.超越村庄:“泉域社会”在中国研究中的意义[J].学术研究,2013,(7):104-111.
[26] (英)莫里斯·弗里德曼.中国东南的宗族组织[M].刘晓春译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.65.
[27] (德)马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会(下卷)[M].林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.731.
[28] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M].北京:北京出版社,2005.
[29] North D.C, Weingast B.R. Constitutions and Commit-ment:The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in 17th Century England[J].Journal of Economic History,1989,49(4):803-832.
[30] (英)弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克.法律、立法与自由(第一卷)[M].邓正来等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2000.
[31] Schneider M, Teske P.Toward A Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government[J].Amer-ican Political Science Review,1992, 86(3).737-747.
[32] 祁建民. 从水权看国家与村落社会的关系[A].山西大学中国社会史研究中心.山西水利社会史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.144.
[33] (法)爱弥儿·涂尔干.宗教生活的基本形式[M].渠东,汲喆译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001.43.
[34] (英)维克多·特纳.象征之林:恩登布人仪式散论[M].赵玉燕,欧阳敏,徐洪峰译.北京:商务印书馆,2012. 63.
[35] 行龙. 从共享到争夺:晋水流域水资源日趋匮乏的历史考察——兼论区域社会史的比较研究[R].太原:区域社会史比较研究中青年学者学术讨论会,2004.8.
[36] (英)玛丽·道格拉斯.制度如何思考[M].张晨曲译.北京:经济管理出版社,2013. 61.
[37] 杨利慧. 仪式的合法性与神话的解构和重构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(6):61-68.
[38] 张乾友. 绩效合法性与行政哲学的可能性[J].公共管理与政策评论,2019,(2):3-13.
[39] (美)阿维纳什·K·迪克西特.经济政策的制定:交易成本政治学的视角[M].刘元春译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.17-21.
[40] 蔡晶晶. 农田水利制度分散实验与人为设计:一个博弈均衡分析[J].国家行政学院学报,2013,(4):63-68.
[41] (美)H.培顿·扬.个人策略与社会结构:制度的演化理论[M].王勇译.上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2004.3.
[42] 王晨. 非物质文化遗产整体性保护研究——以山西四社五村民俗为例[J].北方文学,2017,(6):134.