数智化场域主流意识形态的空间建构逻辑

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (613 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The philosophical narrative of Marx's ideological criticism contains a distinct spatial consciousness. The spatial attributes of ideology are manifested in the spatial presence inherent in its existence, the spatial diffusion implied in its educational function, and the spatial struggle manifested in its core of interest. With the virtual migration and deep expansion of human living space, ideology has turned to represent its spatial presence in a data-driven form, using digital technology as a mediator to achieve its spatial diffusion, and has generated a spatial struggle with the core logic of competing for digital-life time. The new appearance and operational rules presented by the shift in ideological space mean that the digital extension of mainstream ideology is facing a new spatial situation. The data-driven orientation under the equal rights communication structure makes the visibility of mainstream information space covered by flow redundancy. The pleasure logic of digital symbol consumption confines the fluidity of mainstream discourse space by sensory illusions. The tribal trend of digital communication paradigm has led to the disintegration of the mainstream value space integration by digital circles. To consolidate the spatial dominance of mainstream ideology, digital regulations should be used to clear spatial barriers and guide technology to reshape a virtuous information ecosystem, integrating circles and groups to bridge spatial gaps, aggregating collective wisdom to empower digital text production, penetrating spatial barriers through discourse innovation, and creating virtual narrative scenes to activate audience emotional recognition.

Key words： digitalization ideology spatial attributes dominance dataism

Received: 10 February 2024

PACS:	TP391
	D64

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	FANG Zheng

Cite this article:

FANG Zheng. The Spatial Construction Logic of Mainstream Ideology in the Field of Digitalization[J]. , 2024, 41(3): 132-141.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I3/132

[1] 王竹立,吴彦茹,王云.数智时代的育人理念与人才培养模式[J].电化教育研究,2024,(2):13-19.
[2] (美)约书亚·梅罗维茨.消失的地域:电子媒介对社会行动的影响[M].肖志军译.北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[3] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022. 52-53.
[4] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M]马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[6] (德)黑格尔.历史哲学[M].张作成译.北京:北京出版社,2008.15.
[7] (法)阿尔都塞.哲学与政治:阿尔都塞读本[M].陈越译.长春:吉林出版社,2003.
[8] 马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M]马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[9] (美)尼古拉·尼葛洛庞帝.数字化生存[M].胡泳译.海口:海南出版社,1997.213.
[10] (美)安德鲁·海伍德.政治学[M].张立鹏译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.51.
[11] 马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M]马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.4.
[12] (法)亨利·列斐伏尔.空间与政治[M].李春译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015.37.
[13] (美)道格拉斯·凯尔纳.媒体文化[M].丁宁译.北京:商务印书馆,2013.11.
[14] 王宇婷. 数字意识形态风险的诱因、样态及治理[J].理论月刊,2023,(12):23-31.
[15] (美)曼纽尔·卡斯特.认同的力量[M].曹荣湘译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.416.
[16] 温旭. 数字意识形态兴起的价值省思[J].马克思主义研究,2023,(2):138-148.
[17] 郭小平,潘陈青.智能传播的“新社会能见度”控制:要素、机制及其风险[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2021,(9):1-6.
[18] (美)林文刚.媒介环境学:思想沿革与多维视野[M].何道宽译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[19] 方媛. 诱惑与剩余快感——文化消费的两个侧面[J].学术评论,2016,(2):129-134.
[20] 勾彦殳. 虚拟异托邦:论当代大众文化的受众快感机制及其接受效果[J].文艺理论研究,2022,(4):43-51.
[21] Kurt Wolff.The Sociology of Georg Simmel[M].New York:Free Press,1964.13-15.
[22] Henry Jenkins.Textual Poachers:Television Fans and Pa-rticipatory Culture[M].New York:Routledge,1992.262.
[23] 王海燕. 算法可解释性的价值及其法治化路径[J].重庆社会科学,2024,(1):120-135.
[24] (美)兰登·温纳.自主性技术:作为政治思想主题的失控技术[M].杨海燕译.北京:北京大学出社,2014.76.