|
|
|
| County as a Method: Logic, Mechanism and Path of County Urban-rural Integration |
| XIANG Song-lin1, SUN Yue2 |
1. School of Public Management, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui, 230022;
2. School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Promoting the integrated development of urban and rural areas with county as a key entry point is an important strategic arrangement and measure to solve issues relating to agriculture, rural areas and farmers, promote rural revitalization, and achieve common prosperity in the new era, which is highly consistent with the research paradigm of “as a method”. Taking county as an important carrier of urban-rural integration is not only due to the logic of the “upward promotion” of the rural research tradition and the “sinking center” of the urban research tradition, but also its unique advantages such as economic foundation, political autonomy, social connectivity and cultural commonality. From the internal mechanism of “element-structure-system”, the county is the main position of the integration of urban and rural elements, the adhesive of the integration of urban and rural structure, and the main channel of the integration of urban and rural institutions and mechanisms. At the same time, in view of the problems that exist objectively in reality, such as the unsmooth integration of urban and rural elements, the insufficient integration of urban and rural structure, and the imperfect integration of urban and rural systems and institutions, we should smooth the liberalization of the flow of resource factors and promote urban-rural elements integration; upgrade the modernization of the agricultural industry system and promote urban-rural economic integration; promote equalization of basic public services and accelerate urban-rural social integration; strengthen the coordination of new urbanization and rural revitalization and enhance urban-rural spatial integration; improve the integration of urban and rural systems and mechanisms and consolidate urban-rural systems integration. Entering the new development stage, we must adhere to multiple measures at the same time, in order to promote the integration of urban and rural areas at the county level from “concept” to “rational road”, from “idea” to “practice”.
|
|
Received: 26 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平关于“三农”工作论述摘编[M]习近平关于“三农”工作论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2019.42.
[2] 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利[N].光明日报,2017-10-28(001).
[3] 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第五次全体会议公报[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-10/29/content_55877.htm,2023-10-29.
[4] 中共中央国务院关于全面推进乡村振兴加快农业农村现代化的意见[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-02/21/content_5588098.htm,2023-02-21.
[5] 刘岳.作为方法的县[J].文化纵横,2019,(5):70-78+142.
[6] 陈文胜,李珊珊.城乡融合中的县城:战略定位、结构张力与提升路径[J].江淮论坛,2023,(5):13-19+193.
[7] 黄海.转型期乡村社会治理及其本土化分析进路——作为方法的社会越轨群体研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(6):107-115+201-202.
[8] 马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M]马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 603.
[9] 萧子扬. 作为方法的近代乡村问题及重访研究:何谓与何为[J].河北农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(2):56-64.
[10] 费孝通. 江村经济[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.314.
[11] (美)施坚雅.中国农村的市场和社会结构[M].史建云,徐秀丽译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.40.
[12] 田先红.论乡村振兴的县域自主性[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(3):89-99+2.
[13] 史云贵,倪端梅.县域绿色治理的概念内涵、运行模型与路径创新[J].思想战线,2021,(4):154-163.
[14] 龙花楼,徐雨利,郑瑜晗,等.中国式现代化下的县域城乡融合发展[J].经济地理,2023,(7):12-19.
[15] 孙涛,王硕.数字经济赋能城乡多维融合的理论机制与实践方略[J].理论与改革,2023,(1):143-156+168.
[16] 张宾哲,段敏,谭涛.城乡共同体的空间结构、生产秩序与建构路径——基于共生理论的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(5):97-104.
[17] 涂圣伟. 县域内率先破除城乡二元结构:现实价值与实现路径[J].山东社会科学,2023,(7):89-97.
[18] 陈占江.作为方法的乡土——以费孝通著述为中心[J].社会学研究,2023,(4):74-95+227-228.
[19] 周文. 新型城镇化和乡村振兴背景下的城乡融合发展研究[J].政治经济学评论,2022,(3):87-101.
[20] 王春光. 新科技背景下城乡融合发展的风险及对策[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2021,(2):36-42.
[21] 涂圣伟. 城乡融合发展的战略导向与实现路径[J].宏观经济研究,2020,(4):103-116.
[22] 严金明,陈昊,夏方舟.深化农村“三块地”改革:问题、要义和取向[J].改革,2018,(5):48-55.
[23] 张柯. 新时代推动城乡融合高质量发展的逻辑理路及路径选择[J].农业经济,2022,(11):110-112.
[24] 颜培霞. 产业融合推动城乡融合发展研究[J].改革与战略,2018,(11):110-115.
[25] 黄锡生,王中政.论城乡融合发展的双重逻辑及制度统合[J].现代经济探讨,2021,(5):1-9.
[26] 王德福. 拓展乡村振兴的想象力[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,(2):33-40. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
