区域性安全公共产品视域下“一带一路”沿线投资保障体系的构建

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (593 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract After ten years of development, the Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative has achieved substantial results. The B&R Initiative represents China’s wisdom and solution offered to the world, especially to many developing countries, based on its own realities. It has also become a popular regional public product and supply platform. In the face of the complex geopolitical landscape and the challenges arising from the inadequate effectiveness of international coordination mechanisms, international and regional security issues cannot be underestimated. Chinese companies investing in projects along the B&R, as part of the proactive“going global” strategy, are facing increasingly complex investment risks. These risks may hinder the normal operation of overseas projects, increase project costs, and necessitate a shift in focus for investment markets. To effectively mitigate various traditional and non-traditional risks and ensure the smooth progress of overseas project investments, it is essential to strengthen the construction of the investment protection system along the B&R and ensure the continuous supply of regional security public goods. On the one hand, it is necessary to establish a systematic category of institutional security public goods that respond to the actual needs of regional countries by establishing a long-term, effective, open, and inclusive regional security prevention mechanism. This mechanism should provide countermeasures for various possible contingencies. On the other hand, there is a need to shape a regional security perspective and introduce conceptual security public goods that can foster regional consensus, so as to strengthen cooperation and connections among countries at the ideological level. For the Chinese government and enterprises, in the process of promoting the construction of the investment protection system along the B&R,establishing effective channels for security dialogue with countries along the route is foundation, perfecting investment rules and security institutional framework is the core, strengthening risk management is a pillar, and enhancing communication and coordination among all participants is the key.

Key words： regional security public goods the Belt and Road Chinese enterprises overseas investment risks security cooperation

Received: 07 October 2022

PACS:

D815

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HUANG He
	LIU Yan-tong

Cite this article:

HUANG He,LIU Yan-tong. The Construction of Investment Protection System along the Belt and Road from the Perspective of Regional Security Public Goods[J]. , 2023, 40(6): 69-78.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I6/69

[1] 李向阳,胡必亮,徐秀军.共建“一带一路”倡议十周年:回顾与展望[J/OL].国际经济评论,http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3799.F.20230905.1505.002.html,2023-10-02.
[2] 习近平在第三届“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛开幕式上的主旨演讲(全文)[EB/OL].第三届“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛官方网站,http://www.beltandroadforum.org/n101/2023/1018/c132-1174.html,2023-10-18.
[3] Paul Samuelson.The pure theory of public expenditure[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1954,36(4): 387-389.
[4] Inge Kaul,Isabelle Grunberg,Marc Stern.Defining global public goods[A].Inge Kaul,Isabelle Grunberg,Marc Stern(eds).Global Public Goods:International Cooperation in the 21st Century[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1999.4.
[5] (美)罗伯特·吉尔平.国际关系政治经济学[M].杨宇光等译.北京:经济科学出版社,1989.106.
[6] 黄河,戴丽婷,周骁,等.区域性国际公共产品的中国供给[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2019.
[7] Sandler Todd.Global and regional public goods: A prognosis for collective action[J].Fiscal studies,1998,19(3):221-247.
[8] 樊勇明. 东亚合作与区域性国际公共产品[A].上海社会科学界联合会.上海市社会科学界第五届学术年会文集(2007年度)(世界经济·国际政治·国际关系学科卷)[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.49-50.
[9] Sandler Todd.Regional public goods and international organizations[J].The Review of International Organizations,2006,(1):5-25.
[10] 黄河,黄越,赵琳菲.区域性安全公共产品与“一带一路”安全合作体系的建构——以中国企业在巴尔干地区的投资为例[J].复旦国际关系评论,2018,(1):1-21.
[11] 孙云飞. 地区安全公共产品供求关系与东亚安全困境[D].济南:山东大学博士学位论文,2016.46.
[12] (美)斯蒂芬·沃尔特.联盟的起源[M].周丕启译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.21-23.
[13] 刘昌明,孙云飞.安全公共产品供求矛盾与东亚安全困境[J].当代世界社会主义问题,2014,(1):110-127.
[14] 倪世雄. 当代西方国际关系理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005.294.
[15] 张群. 东亚区域公共产品供给与中国—东盟合作[J].太平洋学报,2017,25(5):44-54.
[16] 黄河,刘彦彤.地缘政治风险及其对中国企业海外利益的影响[J].太平洋学报,2023,31(7):45-58.
[17] 姚冬琴. 专访瑞士再保险亚洲区总裁彭凯彤:至2030年,“一带一路”建设将带来340亿美元商业保费[J].中国经济周刊,2017,(22):56-57.
[18] 赵恒. 中国建筑企业海外经营ESG案例分享[J].国际工程与劳务,2023,(4):34-37.
[19] 李巍.友岸外包:拜登政府产业外交新思想[J].文化纵横,2022,(5):8-11+158.
[20] 中国对外投资合作发展报告2022[R/OL].中国商务部,http://fec.mofcom.gov.cn/article/tzhzcj/tzhz/upload//zgdwtzhzfzbg2022.pdf,2023-09-19.
[21] 黄河,郝宇彪,黄昊,等.安全、发展与治理:中国企业海外投资风险及其管控[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2019.133.
[22] 辞海[M]辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2000.223.
[23] 崔珊珊. 权力、观念与制度——新制度主义政治学的政治变迁研究[D].长春:吉林大学博士学位论文,2019. 35.
[24] 李晓峰,周燕萍.“一带一路”与RCEP“双轮”驱动更高水平对外开放[N].南方日报,2022-12-19(A11).
[25] Karl Deutsch,Sidney Burrelland,Richard Van Wagenen,et al.Political Community and the North Atlantic Area:International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1957. 5-6.