他者视角与本位立场：“中国认同”问题式的学理源起与逻辑证成

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (642 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The problem domain of “Chinese Identity” has kept academic boom for both “Sinology” and “China Studies” for a long time. Under the background of globalization, “Chinese identity” has become the external proving to build a strong sense of a community for the Chinese nation. However, due to the differences between Chinese and Western cultural perspectives, the cognition of China in Western academic circles is based on the “OTHER” frame, forming a mirror image of “China’s identity”, which makes “Chinese identity” out of focus and misalignment. This is the theoretical origin of the problematic of “Chinese Identity”. Influenced by the above, the ethnic Chinese overseas, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions respectively form “Chineseness identity” and “the civilization-nation dyad’ identity” in logic proving of the problematic of Chinese identity in practice. “China’s identity” places the Chinese civilization-state in the counterpoint of the Western nation-state, “Chineseness identity” places the Chinese cultural tradition in the counterpoint of the group rights and interests, and “the civilization-nation dyad’ identity” places the national community of Chinese civilization in the counterpoint of the regional community of regional culture. The root cause of the mirror image of “Chinese identity” and multiple logic proving paths of the problematic of “Chinese identity” lies in the disharmony and separation among culture, nation and state identity. Only by questioning the OTHER from the problematic of Chinese identity, establishing the Chinese cultural standard position of “Chinese identity” and erecting the basic premise of the problematic of “Chinese identity” that national identity takes precedence over regional identity, can the authenticity of “Chinese identity” be restored, national subjectivity be reconstructed and the self-confidence in Chinese culture be built up. The “authenticity” of “Chinese identity” lies in the unity of cultural identity and national identity, with the trinity of “cultural identity”, “ethnic identity” and “national identity” as its core representation. The mutual nesting of civilization community and national community constitutes a unified and self-consistent logic proving of “Chinese identity”.

Key words： Chinese identity the OTHER mirror image comparison between China and the West Chinese culture community for the Chinese nation

Received: 16 August 2023

PACS:

G122

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	FU Cai-wu
	LI Yue

Cite this article:

FU Cai-wu,LI Yue. The Perspective of the OTHER and Standard Position:The Theoretical Origin and Logic Proving of the Problematic of “Chinese Identity”[J]. , 2023, 40(6): 46-58.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I6/46

[1] (法)路易·阿尔都塞.保卫马克思[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984.42-54.
[2] Louis Althusser.Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays[M].Ben Brewster trans.Delhi:AAKAR Books,2006.39-40.
[3] 张一兵.问题式:阿尔都塞的核心理论范式[J].哲学研究,2002,(7):22-30.
[4] (美)爱德华·W.萨义德.东方学[M].王宇根译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2019.63-97.
[5] 陈寅恪. 唐代政治史述论稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.17.
[6] 钱穆. 中國文化史導論(修訂本)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994.41.
[7] 杨度. 金铁主义说[A].左玉河.杨度卷[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.182-183.
[8] 梁启超. 政治学大家伯伦知理之学说[A].张品兴.梁启超全集(第2册)[C].北京:北京出版社,1999.1067-1068.
[9] 费孝通. 中华民族多元一体格局(修订本)[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999.3-4.
[10] 傅才武,严星柔.论建设21世纪中华民族文化共同体[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,(5):63-74.
[11] 冯天瑜. 中华元典精神[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006. 359-363.
[12] (荷)冯客.近代中国之种族观念[M].杨立华译.南京:江苏人民出版社,1999.11-43.
[13] (美)拉铁摩尔.中国的亚洲内陆边疆[M].唐晓峰译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2010.
[14] (美)巴菲尔德.危险的边疆:游牧帝国与中国[M].袁剑译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2011.18-26.
[15] (美)班茂燊.唐代中国的族群认同[M].耿协峰译.北京:人民出版社,2017.155-177.
[16] (美)费正清.一种初步的构想[A].费正清.中国的世界秩序[M].杜继东译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010.2.
[17] Arthur Waldron.The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990. 15-132.
[18] (美)刘子健.中国转向内在:两宋之际的文化转向[M].赵冬梅译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2011.40-129.
[19] (美)濮德培.中國西征:大清征服中央歐亞与蒙古帝国的最後的挽歌[M].葉品岑,蔡偉傑,林文凱譯.新北市:衛城出版社,2021.36-38.
[20] (美)司徒安.身体与笔:18世纪中国作为文本/表演的大祀[M].李晋译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.60-258.
[21] Mark C.Elliott. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China[M].Stanford, California: Stanford University Press,2001.4.
[22] (美)孔飞力.叫魂:1768年中国妖术大恐慌[M].陈兼,刘昶译.上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012.75-76.
[23] (美)张勉治.马背上的朝廷:巡幸与清朝统治的建构[M].董建中译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2019.8-27.
[24] Pamela Kyle Crossley.A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology[M].Berkeley: University of California Press,2002.9-12.
[25] Victor G Kiernan.The Lords of Human Kind[M]. Boston:Little, Brown and Company,1969.183-186.
[26] Ssu-yu Teng, John King Fairbank. China’s Response to the West:A Documentary Survey,1839-1923[M].Cambri-dge: Harvard University Press,1954.5.
[27] (美)约瑟夫·列文森.儒教中国及其现代命运[M].郑大华,任菁译.南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2009.
[28] (美)约瑟夫·勒文森.梁启超与中国近代思想[M].刘伟,刘丽等译.成都:四川人民出版社,1986.87.
[29] Dankwart A Rustow.A World of Nations[M].Washington D.C: The Brookings Institution,1967.30-39.
[30] Lucian W Pye.China: Erratic State, Frustrated Society[J].Foreign Affairs,1990,69(4).
[31] (美)杜赞奇.从民族国家拯救历史:民族主义话语与中国现代史研究[M].王宪明,高继美,李海燕,李点译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[32] 姚大力.变化中的国家认同——对中国国家观念史的研究述评[J].原道(第17辑),2010,(00).
[33] Lucian W Pye.Identity and the Political Culture[A].Leonard Binder.Crises and Sequences in Political Deve-lopment[C].Princeton NJ:Princeton University Press,1971. 115-116.
[34] 方朝晖. 什么是中国文化中有效的权威?——评白鲁恂《亚洲权力与政治》一书[J].开放时代,2013,(3):198-213.
[35] 车琳. 20世纪60-70年代法国“原样派”知识分子的中国观[A].张西平,顾钧.中国文化的域外解读[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.133.
[36] (美)柯文.在中国发现历史:中国中心观在美国的兴起[M].林同奇译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.282-342.
[37] (英)马丁·雅克.大国雄心:一个永不褪色的大国梦[M].张莉,刘曲译.北京:中信出版社,2016.176.
[38] 徐勇. 长周期历史观中的中国政治演化[J].南國學術(澳门大学文科学报),2022,(2):172-180.
[39] 张西平. 比较文学视野下的海外汉学研究[A].张西平,顾钧.中国文化的域外解读[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.6.
[40] Daniel Garber, Micheal Ayers.The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-century Philosophy[M].Cambridge:Cam-bridge University Press,1998.88.
[41] (美)鲁恂·W.派伊.政治发展面面观[M].任晓,王元译.天津:天津人民出版社,2009.21.
[42] Adam McKeown. Conceptualizing Chinese Diasporas, 1842-1949[J].The Journal of Asian Studies,1999,(2):306-337.
[43] (澳)王赓武.华人与中国:王赓武自选集[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013.263-276.
[44] James R Rush.Social Control and Influence in Ninete-enth Century Indonesia: Opium Farms and the Chinese of Java[J]. Indonesia,1983,35(4):53-64.
[45] Jennifer W. Cushman,Wang Gungwu.Changing Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese Since World War II[M].Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press,1990.113-214.
[46] Wei Ming Tu.Cultural China: The Periphery as the Center[J].Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,1991,(2):1-31.
[47] Ien Ang.On Not Speaking Chinese:Living Between Asia and West[M].London: Routledge,2001.21-36.
[48] 祝捷,章小杉.“香港本土意识”的历史性梳理与还原 ——兼论“港独”思潮的形成与演化[J].港澳研究,2016,(1).
[49] (葡)卡门·曼德思.中葡澳门谈判(1986-1999)[M].臧小华译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018.9-29.
[50] 刘凌斌. 两岸大交流背景下台湾青年的“国家认同”研究[J].台湾研究,2014,(5):10-18.
[51] 仰海峰.超真实、拟真与内爆——后期鲍德里亚思想中的三个重要概念[J].江苏社会科学,2011,(4).
[52] 傅才武,魏冀.中华文化传承视野下国家文化公园的价值定位及政策意义[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(5):34-47.
[53] 梁漱溟. 中国文化要义[A].中国文化书院学术委员会.梁漱溟全集(第三卷)[C].济南:山东人民出版社,1989.
[54] Robert Young.White Mythologies:Writing History and the West[M].London: Routledge,1990.126.