|
|
|
| The Body Imagination and Heterogeneity Aesthetics in the Narrative of Science Fiction Movies in the Context of Post Human |
| LIU Yong-liang |
| Academy of Fine Arts, Anhui University of Arts, Hefei, Anhui, 230011 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The development of network technology and virtual reality technology has brought space for humans to imagine and showcase themselves. In the world of virtual reality, various imaginations of human beings can be realized through artificial intelligence, thus foreseeing the future and marking the arrival of the post human era. In science fiction movies, the human body of natural life is replaced by the body of post human technology, the body of media, and the data-driven body. It can be the body of cyberborg, which coexists in various forms such as carbon based, silicon based, and virtual information programs. At this time, race, gender, and identity are all alienated. At this point, the “post human body” has greater inclusiveness, and in the virtual social landscape, the human body also becomes a part of the post human body. In science fiction movies, the narrative of post human bodies is described as heterogeneous bodies, exhibiting fragmented, anti linear, cross media, interactive, landscape oriented, and immersive narrative characteristics. The body imagination and narrative expression in science fiction movies have changed human thinking patterns and aesthetic concepts, breaking the traditional philosophical proposition of human subjectivity, and thus forming a heterogeneous aesthetics. Heterogeneous aesthetics relies on the development of material technology, but its aesthetic object is not a completely objective object. It is void and heterogeneous, and heterogeneous aesthetics emphasizes the process experience of human participation. It is experiential and ecological. It is an ecological encounter process of human existence.It can be seen that heterogeneous aesthetics is not only a transcendence of nihilism; It is also a continuation of ecologism.
|
|
Received: 16 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Ihab Hassan.Prometheus as Performer:Toward a Posthu-manist Culture?[J].The Georgia Review,1977,(4):830-850.
[2] (美)唐娜·哈拉维.类人猿、赛博格和女人:自然的重塑[M].陈静译.郑州:河南大学出版社,2016.326.
[3] (美)凯瑟琳·海勒.我们何以成为后人类[M].刘宇清译.北京:北京大学出版社,2017.
[4] 王玉玊.虚拟现实:真实感与想象力[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,(1):35-41.
[5] (德)鲁道夫·爱因汉姆.电影作为艺术[M].杨跃译.北京:中国电影出版社,1981.23.
[6] 廖述务.延搁与重构:身体叙事学建构的诗学逻辑[J].湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(3):24-29+122.
[7] (俄)列夫·马诺维奇.新媒体的语言[M].车琳译.贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2021.277.
[8] 王竞,梁丽华.用影像讲故事[M].北京:北京联合出版公司,2016.
[9] (法)德波.景观社会[M].王昭风译.南京:南京大学出版社,2006.10.
[10] Espen J.Aarseth.Cyberlext:Perspectives on Ergodic Lite-ranre[M].Baltimore:Johns Hoplkins Univerity Press,1997. 48.
[11] (法)梅洛·庞蒂.知觉现象学[M].姜志辉译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[12] (德)尼采.查拉图斯特拉如是说[M].钱春绮译.北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007.178-179.
[13] 肖炜静. 福柯“异托邦”在汉语世界的语义分叉、创生驱力及理论反思[J].华文文学, 2017,(6):53-61.
[14] 张中. 纯粹直观与异质美学——列维纳斯论直觉、感知与审美[J].江淮论坛,2014,(4):35-40.
[15] 刘永亮,钟大丰.跨媒介叙事视角下电影生态美学研究[J].现代传播,2017,(10):85-91.
[16] 刘欣,陆蓓蓓.“后人类”身体的嬗变及其媒介性——基于中国科幻文艺的考察[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(1):44-53.
[17] (法)让·鲍德里亚.完美的罪行[M].王为民译.北京:商务印书馆,2014.28. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
