|
|
|
| The Historical Configuration of Contemporary Literary Theory and Its “Inside and Outside” |
| WANG Dan |
| College of Liberal Arts, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, 464000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The history of literary studies in contemporary western literary theory is based on the conscious attention to language. In particular, the “language problem” raised by the linguistic criticism starting from the Russian formalism and the Anglo-American New criticism fundamentally determines its configuration process as an organic whole. Although the theoretical discourses presented in the form of “literary theory”, “theory”, “cultural research”, “anti-theory” and “post-theory” have their own opinions on the relationship between language and literature, there is a consensus that language research is the premise or basis of literary interpretation. However, due to the differences in the cognition of “language”, various critical theories interpret literature in different ways. Therefore, the study of language in contemporary Western literary theory has undergone a transformation process from focusing on language itself to focusing on language activities, and has been concretely externalized into the development of “language form research → language structure research → language activity research”. Returning to the “historical scene” and clarifying this “internal and external” connection between the historical configuration of contemporary Western literary theory and the evolution of linguistic criticism will not only help deepen the understanding of the meaning, function and depth of linguistic criticism, but also provide a certain reference for examining the “Sinicization” process of foreign theoretical knowledge and its products.
|
|
Received: 05 September 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (英)特雷·伊格尔顿.二十世纪西方文学理论[M].伍晓明译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.94.
[2] (英)罗里·赖安,苏珊·范·齐尔.当代西方文学理论导引[M].李敏儒等译.成都:四川文艺出版社,1986.1.
[3] (美)爱德华·W.萨义德.开端:意思与方法[M].章乐天译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2014.
[4] (美)罗曼·雅各布森.俄罗斯新诗[J].黄玫,周启超译选.社会科学战线,2020,(3):137-157.
[5] (苏)B·艾亨巴乌姆.谈谈“形式主义者”的问题[A].张捷编选.十月革命前后苏联文学流派(下编)[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1998.207.
[6] (美)勒内·韦勒克,奥斯丁·沃伦.文学理论[M].刘象愚等译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2005.
[7] (比利时)J.M.布洛克曼.结构主义:莫斯科―布拉格―巴黎[M].李幼蒸译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.4.
[8] (英)彼得·巴里.理论入门:文学与文化理论导论[M].杨建国译.南京:南京大学出版社,2014.298-299.
[9] 刘阳. 思辨·事件·生命:语言论之后的三种转向[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2023,(1):30-40.
[10] (美)弗兰克·伦特里奇亚.新批评之后[M].王丽明等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2017.3.
[11] (德)汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎译.北京:商务印书馆,2011.512.
[12] (法)安托万·孔帕尼翁.理论的幽灵——文学与常识[M].吴泓缈等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2011.5.
[13] (意)安伯托·艾柯.开放的作品[M].刘儒庭译.北京:新星出版社,2009.7.
[14] (法)罗兰·巴尔特.写作的零度[M].李幼蒸译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.7.
[15] (美)乔纳森·卡勒.结构主义诗学[M].盛宁译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.8.
[16] (英)斯图尔特·霍尔.表征——文化表征与意指实践[M].徐亮等译.北京:商务印书馆,2013.
[17] (美)M.A.R.哈比布.文学批评史:从柏拉图到现在[M].阎嘉译.南京:南京大学出版社,2017.523.
[18] (匈牙利)乔治·马尔库什.语言与生产——范式批判[M].李大强等译.哈尔滨:黑龙江大学出版社,2011.19.
[19] (俄)沃洛希洛夫.马克思主义与语言哲学[A].许宝强,袁伟选编.语言与翻译的政治[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2001.72.
[20] 王丹. 语言意识与语言批评的维度演变[M].上海:上海三联书店,2014.125.
[21] (法)米歇尔·福柯.知识考古学(四版)[M].董树宝译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2021.
[22] (法)阿尔都塞.哲学与政治——阿尔都塞读本(下)[M].陈越译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2011.296.
[23] (苏)巴赫金.巴赫金全集(第二卷)[M].李辉凡等译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2009.165.
[24] Paul de Man. The Resistance to Theory[M].Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,1986.7.
[25] (法)雅克·德里达.论文字学[M].汪堂家译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.237.
[26] (英)拉曼·塞尔登.文学批评理论:从柏拉图到现在[M].刘象愚等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003.24.
[27] (美)保罗·德曼.解构之图[M].李自修等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
[28] (美)J.希利斯·米勒.重申解构主义[M].郭英剑等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
[29] 刘阳.当代事件文论的主线发生与复调构成[J].学术研究,2021,(8):154-164+188.
[30] (美)文森特·B.里奇.21世纪的文学批评:理论的复兴[M].朱刚等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2021.167.
[31] 生安锋,林峰.后理论语境下的文学理论境况与特征[J].学术研究,2021,(12):163-171+178.
[32] 罗崇宏. 当代文论的生产模式及“理论”话语的生成——以建构、语境和先验等概念为中心[J].学术界,2022,(7):112-124.
[33] (美)爱德华·W.赛义德.赛义德自选集[M].谢少波等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.139.
[34] (德)卡尔·曼海姆.意识形态与乌托邦[M].黎鸣等译.上海:上海三联书店,2011.20. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
