|
|
|
| High Quality Development Direction of Cultural Industries in the Process of Chinese Path to Modernization |
| ZHANG Zhen-peng |
| Institute of Cultural Industry, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract High quality development of the cultural industries is the meaning of Chinese path to modernization. “Value orientation - action direction - force target - goal orientation” constitutes the four dimensions of high quality development of the cultural industries. The“value orientation” of high quality development of the cultural industries in Chinese path to modernization is to highlight the characteristics of the Chinese cultural industries, that is, overall and balanced regional coordinated development, cultural innovation and development to create common prosperity, healthy industrial development with dual effects and unity, harmonious and symbiotic resource intensive development, and civilized and diversified development with win-win cooperation; The“action direction” is to promote the digital improvement and efficiency of the cultural industries, that is, to achieve the overall digital transformation of the cultural industries structure, enhance the digital innovation ability of cultural enterprises, and construct a digital cultural industries ecosystem of value co creation; The “force target” is to support the sustainable development of new cultural enterprises, that is, to clarify the connotation and significance of new cultural enterprises, play their main role, and achieve their long-term value; The“goal orientation” refers to enhancing the influence of the dissemination of Chinese civilization, namely creating high quality content with empathy, innovating narrative methods that adapt to modernization, and creating diversified communication paths. High quality development of Chinese path to modernization of the cultural industries can contribute to the mutual learning, progress and prosperity of the global cultural industries and contribute to China’s paradigm and experience.
|
|
Received: 26 June 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.22.
[2] 魏传光. “中国式现代化观”的理论创新[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,44(11):1-9.
[3] 何弘.网络文学异军突起是新时代文学的亮丽景观[N].中国文化报,2022-10-20(007).
[4] 顾江. 党的十八大以来我国文化产业发展的成就、经验与展望[J].管理世界,2022,38(7):49-60.
[5] 李北伟,宗信,李阳.产业视角下国内外数字化转型研究:综述及展望[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(2):150-160.
[6] 张振鹏. 文化产业数字化的理论框架、现实逻辑与实现路径[J].社会科学战线,2022,(9):74-83.
[7] Vega A, Chiasson M.A Comprehensive Framework to Research Digital Innovation:the Joint Use of the Systems of Innovation and Critical Realism[J].The Journal of Stra-tegic Information Systems,2019,28(3):242-256.
[8] 陈楠,蔡跃洲,马晔风.制造业数字化转型动机、模式与成效——基于典型案例和问卷调查的实证分析[J].改革,2022,(11):37-53.
[9] (德)克劳斯·施瓦布,(澳)尼古拉斯·戴维斯.第四次工业革命[M].世界经济论坛北京代表处译.北京:中信出版社,2018.40-46.
[10] 谢卫红,林培望,李忠顺,郭海珍.数字化创新:内涵特征、价值创造与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(9):19-31.
[11] 傅才武,明琰.数字信息技术赋能当代文化产业新型生态圈[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023, 62(1):78-86.
[12] 张洪,鲁耀斌,张凤娇.价值共创研究述评:文献计量分析及知识体系构建[J].科研管理,2021,42(12):88-99.
[13] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[M]中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2021.85.
[14] 刘汉民,解晓晴,齐宇.工业革命、组织变革与企业理论创新[J].经济与管理研究,2020,41(8):3-13.
[15] 吴江,陈婷,龚艺巍等.企业数字化转型理论框架和研究展望[J].管理学报,2021,18(12):1871-1880.
[16] 陈威如,王节祥.依附式升级:平台生态系统中参与者的数字化转型战略[J].管理世界,2021,37(10):195-214.
[17] (美)亚瑟·乔拉米卡利.共情力:你压力大是因为没有共情能力[M].耿沫译.北京:北京联合出版公司,2017. 13-15.
[18] 陈功,韩佳秀.“讲好中国故事”的关键命题及理论阐释[J].江西社会科学,2022,42(12):180-188.
[19] 张振鹏. 中国文化创意产品优秀特质及实现[J].求实,2012,(10):73-76.
[20] 王永贵,郭笑笑.数字视频营销的价值与效果评价[J].清华管理评论,2022,(12):41-47.
[21] 宗祖盼,刘欣雨.“国潮”的消费认同与价值尺度[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,39(4):56-63. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
