ChatGPT何以变革教育研究范式

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (608 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Generative AI, exemplified by ChatGPT, marks a pivotal advancement in technology history. Modern educational research paradigms face significant challenges. Epistemologically, there’s a disconnect between theory and practice. Ontologically, divergent stances result in confrontations among varied subjects. Methodologically, there’s a lack of integration and innovation. Axiologically, research values seem inconsistent and waning in conviction. ChatGPT demonstrates the potential to revolutionize the educational research paradigm: it can reshape knowledge production, bridging theory to real-world application; overcome ontological barriers, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration; integrate diverse research methods, spurring innovation; and balance various value orientations, moving away from sheer utilitarianism. However, ChatGPT, being transformative, isn't without pitfalls, including potential errors in knowledge generation, opaque processes, and risks of academic misconduct and copyright issues. Scholars’ roles seem diminished, risking over-reliance on algorithms, and there are concerns over national security and societal impacts. To utilize ChatGPT effectively for reshaping educational research towards Chinese modernization, there’s a need to: restructure knowledge production logic; innovate ontologically while maintaining human-centric research; blend traditional and novel research methods; and emphasize humanistic values, prioritizing benevolence in research orientation.

Key words： educational research paradigm ChatGPT Generative Artificial Intelligence Chinese modernization

Received: 11 July 2023

PACS:

G40-03

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HE Wei-guang
	LI Jun

Cite this article:

HE Wei-guang,LI Jun. How Has the ChatGPT Transformed the Paradigm of Educational Research?[J]. , 2023, 40(5): 15-25.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I5/15

[1] OpenAI. GPT-4[ED/OL].https://openai.com/research/gpt-4,2023-07-03.
[2] Van Dis E A M, Bollen J, Zuidema W, et al. ChatGPT: Five priorities for research[J].Nature,2023,614(7947):224-226.
[3] 马凤岐,谢爱磊.教育知识的基础与教育研究范式分类[J].教育研究,2020,41(5):135-148.
[4] Kivunja C, Kuyini A B.Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts[J].International Journal of higher education,2017,6(5):26-41.
[5] Taylor P C, Medina M.Educational research paradigms: From positivism to pluralism[J].College Research Journal, 2011,1(1):1-16.
[6] Chipindi F M, Serenje-Chipindi J, Daka H.An Analysis of Epistemological Considerations in Educational Research[J]. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology,2020,4(2):105-118.
[7] 袁振国. 实证研究是教育学走向科学的必要途径[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2017,35(3):4-17.
[8] Munoz-Najar Galvez S, Heiberger R, McFarland D. Paradigm wars revisited: A cartography of graduate resea-rch in the field of education(1980-2010)[J].American Edu-cational Research Journal,2020,57(2):612-652.
[9] 王卫华. 教育思辨研究与教育实证研究:从分野到共生[J].教育研究,2019,40(9):139-148.
[10] (美)拉瑞·劳丹.进步及其问题[M].刘新民译.北京:华夏出版社,1990.5.
[11] 张羽,刘惠琴,石中英.指向教育实践改进的系统范式——主流教育研究范式的危机与重构[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,42(4):78-90.
[12] Khatri K K.Research paradigm:A philosophy of educa-tional research[J].International Journal of English Litera-ture and Social Sciences,2020,5(5):1435-1440.
[13] 曾荣光,罗云,叶菊艳.教育研究本体论的再认识:从意识到制度[J].北京大学教育评论,2023,21(1):134-165.
[14] 李均,黄丹阳.“人”的回归与高等教育研究的微观转向——来自微观史学的启示[J].江苏高教,2021,(8):35-40.
[15] 孙振东. 教育研究方法论探索[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2008.187.
[16] 方泽强,黎旋.普及化阶段高等教育研究应何为?——主体、论域、价值和方法之变革[J].江苏高教,2022(4):10-18.
[17] 汪基德,王开.关于教育研究范式分类问题的探讨[J].教育研究与实验,2021,(3):65-70.
[18] 付八军. 高等教育研究方法:目的抑或手段?[J].高教发展与评估,2019,35(1):18-20.
[19] 任萍萍,李鑫.循证教育研究:缘起、困境、体系框架与实施建议[J].中国电化教育,2021,(12):33-39.
[20] 董云川. 高等教育研究的角色与话语[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2022,21(5):62-67.
[21] 王洪才,田芬.“证实规律”与“阐释意义”:人工智能时代教育研究范式的两种旨趣[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2021,58(3):84-93.
[22] 李均. 论学术信仰[J].高等教育研究,2022,43(12):7-15.
[23] Gibbons, M, Limoges C,Nowotny H, et al. The new production of knowledge:The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M].London:SAGE Pub-lications,1994.3.
[24] Bacon F.Novum organum[M].New York: P.F. Collier, 1902. 48.
[25] Popper K.The logic of scientific discovery[M].New York: Routledge,2005.80.
[26] 刘旭东.回到原点:论教育的学术传统[J].教育研究,2013, 34(8):10-15.
[27] Knorr-Cetina K D. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science[M].Oxford: Pergamon Press,1981.11.
[28] Rahman M M, Watanobe Y.ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies[J].Applied Sciences,2023,13(9):5783.
[29] 肖绍明. “朝向事件本身”的教育研究[J].高等教育研究,2020,41(5):10-17.
[30] 任剑涛. 知识与情感:ChatGPT驱动的交往革命[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,22(4):11-16.
[31] 余清臣. 论教育研究方法的技术与艺术逻辑[J].教育研究与实验,2023,(2):25-34.
[32] Repko A F, Szostak R.Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory[M].California: Sage Publications, 2020.135.
[33] 郑永和,周丹华,张永和等.计算教育学视域下的Chat-GPT:内涵、主题、反思与挑战[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,41(7):91-102.
[34] 谭维智. 将科幻作为一种教育研究范式[J].教育研究,2022,43(5):17-33.
[35] 顾小清,蔡慧英.预见人工智能的未来及其教育影响——以社会性科幻为载体的思想实验[J].教育研究,2021,42(5):137-147.
[36] Taecharungroj V.“What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter[J]. Big Data and Cognitive Computing,2023,7(1): 35.
[37] Burger B, Kanbach D K, Kraus S, et al.On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2023,26(7):233-241.
[38] 荀渊. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与高等教育的价值和使命[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,41(7):56-63.
[39] Anders G.Die Antiquiertheit Des Menschen Band II: über die Zerstarung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution[M].München: C.H.Beck,2018.37.
[40] Gravel J, D’Amours-Gravel M, Osmanlliu E. Learning to fake it: Limited responses and fabricated references provided by ChatGPT for medical questions[J].Mayo Clinic Proceedings:Digital Health,2023,1(3):226-234.
[41] 肖峰. 生成式人工智能介入知识生产的功用探析——借助ChatGPT和“文心一言”探究数字劳动的体验[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2023,35(4):1-10.
[42] Ray P P.ChatGPT:A comprehensive review on backgro-und, applications, key challenges,bias, ethics, limitations and future scope[J].Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems,2023,(3):121-154.
[43] 焦建利,陈丽,吴伟伟.由ChatGPT引发的教育之问:可能影响与应对之策[J].中国教育信息化,2023,29(3):19-32.
[44] 张璐,郭晓亮,景勇等.ChatGPT对学术期刊的影响及应对策略研究[ED/OL].https://doi.org/10.19619/j.issn.1007-1938.2023.00.043.2023-08-10.
[45] 李仪,王蒙.ChatGPT视野下知识产权保护困境及对策研究——以成渝治理者对ChatGPT数据产品确权为视角[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2023,37(6):129-136.
[46] 蓝江. ChatGPT是否会吞噬我们的剩余快感——人工智能时代的病理学分析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,76(4):53-61.
[47] 张夏恒. ChatGPT的政治社会动能、风险及防范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(3):5-12.
[48] 贾利军,徐韵,贺达豪等.魔鬼还是天使:从ChatGPT爆火看人工智能与科学的发展方向[J].上海管理科学,2023, 45(4):8-14.
[49] 何伟光.走向解放:人工智能教育应用本质的哲学沉思[J].中国远程教育,2023,43(7):11-20.
[50] 王茂福,严雪雁.生成式人工智能赋能数字乡村建设:应用价值、现实梗阻与路径支持[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(4):87-96.
[51] 唐玉溪,何伟光.人工科学视域下的世界一流大学智能教育体系建设——以卡内基梅隆大学为例[J].现代教育技术,2023,33(4):119-126.
[52] 王少. ChatGPT介入思想政治教育的技术线路、安全风险及防范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(2):153-160.
[53] 唐玉溪,何伟光.世界一流大学智能教育何以可能——基于美国五所高校的案例分析[J].现代大学教育,2023,39(3):45-54.
[54] 王建磊,曹卉萌.ChatGPT的传播特质、逻辑、范式[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(2):144-152.
[55] 唐玉溪,何伟光.人工智能时代教师何以存在:规定、窘境与超越[J].中国远程教育,2022,(10):21-28.