|
|
|
| Right Confirmation and Function Turning in the Process of Legalization of Personnel Archives Management in China |
| ZHENG Shang-yuan, WANG Zhao |
| Law School of Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Personnel archives are brief records of historical and current personal information. They are both static and dynamic at the same time, and should be protected by law. In China, personnel archives are in the hands of employers under the public law administration system. This closed personnel archives administration system has not completed its function transformation after the institution transition. For a long time, we are confronted with many predicaments: people do not have the right to self-determination of their personal information; the subject right system has yet to take form; the institution and system do not work well; legal disputes increase. Given the fact that control is stressed over use in personnel archive administration, the reform in this regard should prioritize introducing self-determination of personal information, recognizing and protecting the rights of archive holders in obedience to the law, and make personnel archive administration digitized and socialized. On the basis of self-determination of personal information, specific rights should be entitled to personnel archive holders according to the characteristics of the archives. All kinds of personnel archives should be legally administered by personnel archive administration institutions of social functions, and employers and personnel archive holders can keep some copies of the archive for proper use. We should ensure the rights and interests to personnel archive holders. They should be entitled to know what is in their archive, access, copy and transfer their archive, correct, supplement, and delete information in the archive, and request explanation. But personnel archive holders and administration institutions do not enjoy property interests on personnel archives.
|
|
Received: 01 June 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 孙平. “信息人”时代——网络安全下的个人信息权宪法保护[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2018.
[2] 肖登辉. 行政法中的个人信息保护问题探究[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2011.17.
[3] James P.Nehf. Recognizing the Social Value in Information Privacy[J].Washington Law Review,2003,78(1):1-75.
[4] 丁晓东. 论个人信息法律保护的思想渊源与基本原理——基于“公平信息实践的分析”[J].现代法学,2019,(3):96-110.
[5] 丁晓东. 个人信息权利的反思与重塑——论个人信息保护的适用前提与法益基础[J].中外法学. 2020,(2):339-356.
[6] 齐爱民. 个人资料保护法原理及其跨国流通法律问题研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004.10.
[7] 郑尚元. 企、事业单位人事档案纠纷之法律分析[J].法学,2007,(10):24-30.
[8] 马国顺. 延安时期我国干部人事档案的形成[J].山西档案,2018,(4):162-164.
[9] 邓绍兴. 档案的历史沿革[J].中国人才,2002,(6):6-9.
[10] 刘建军.单位中国:社会调控体系重构中的个人、组织与国家[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000.63.
[11] 王利明. 论个人信息权的法律保护——以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心[J].现代法律,2013,(4):62-72.
[12] 杨芳. 个人信息自决权理论及其检讨——兼论个人信息保护法之保护客体[J].比较法研究,2015,(6):22-33.
[13] 刘金瑞. 个人信息与权利配置——个人信息自决权的反思和出路[M].北京:法律出版社,2017.72.
[14] 王利明. 论《个人信息保护法》的亮点、特色与适用[J]. 法学家,2021,(6):1-16.
[15] 姚佳. 知情同意原则抑或信赖授权原则——兼论数字时代的信用重建[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(2):48-55.
[16] 吴文芳. 劳动者个人信息处理中同意的适用与限制[J]. 中国法学,2022,(1):221-243.
[17] 李升元. 我国个人信息档案的隐私权保护研究[A]. 中国法学会行政法学研究会2009年年会论文集(上册)[C].2009.469-479.
[18] 程啸,王苑.论我国个人信息保护法中的查阅复制权[J].法律适用,2021,(12):17-27.
[19] 张新宝. 论个人信息权益的构造[J].中外法学,2021,(5):1144-1166.
[20] 陈潭. 单位身份的松动——中国人事档案制度研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2007.113.
[21] (德)雷蒙德·瓦尔特曼.德国劳动法[M].沈建峰译.北京:法律出版社,2014.225.
[22] 李哲. 劳动者人事档案纠纷法律对策研究[J].山西档案,2017,(2):88-90.
[23] 董佳. 大数据背景下的企业人事档案数字化管理研究[J].中小企业管理与科技,2021,(10):37-39.
[24] 朱学栋. 浅谈人事档案管理模式的变革:社会化和开放式管理[J].文化创新比较研究,2018,2(19):160-161.
[25] 刘皓. 对人事档案社会化管理模式的探讨[J].办公室业务,2018,(8):174-175.
[26] 马玉祥. 人事档案社会化管理机构档案利用探讨[J].山东档案,2016,(4):28-29.
[27] 申卫星. 论数据用益权[J].中国社会科学,2020,(11):110-131.
[28] 梅夏英. 在分享和控制之间——数据保护的私法局限和公共秩序构建[J].中外法学,2019,(4):845-870.
[29] 丁晓东. 论企业数据权益的法律保护——基于数据法律性质的分析[J].法律科学,2020,(2):90-99.
[30] 冯晓青. 数据财产化及其法律规制的理论阐释与构建[J].政法论丛,2021,(4):81-97 |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
