|
|
|
| Connection, Criticism and Principles: Chen Shidao's Denial and Reverse Development of Wang Anshi in Poetry Writing |
| ZHOU Zi-yi |
| College of Humanities, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330031 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Chen Shidao hurled harsh criticism at Wang Anshi regarding his character and academic achievement and totally denied his poetry creation. His creation theory which elevated simple over artful, humble over pretentious, rough over feeble, and secluded over tacky mostly targeted Wang Anshi. On the one hand, his poetry creation followed Wang Anshi in using the techniques of bi and xing (originated in the Book of Songs), while denounced the technique of fu, which was straightforward and used by Han Yu school (introducing expression techniques of prose in poetry creation). This is the core principle of his poetry creation. On the other hand, he learned from Huang Tingjian and worked out an approach to studying Du Fu, using empty words to enrich artistic flavor but not writing about beautiful natural scenery. At the same time, he followed Zeng Gong in prose writing, learned a simple style and finally developed his own style, which is plain but powerful and simple yet rich. Whether in creation theory or writing practice, Chen Shidao chose the opposite of Wang Anshi to develop his unique style. His special acceptance of Wang Anshi is the result of the combination of the internal strife of political groups in the Northern Song Dynasty and Chen Shidao's family background, thought and disposition, and his interaction with his teachers and friends. Many poets of Jiangxi Poetry School in the Song Dynasty were deeply influenced by Wang Anshi's poetry creation. Chen Shidao rejected Wang Anshi and chose to go against him in poetry creation, providing more space for the diverse development of the Jiang Xi School of poetry. The connection between Chen Shidao and Wang Anshi in poetry creation is not only related to the continuity of Tang and Song poetry, but also reflects the internal mechanism of the development and evolution of Song poetry.
|
|
Received: 20 June 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈师道. 后山诗注补笺[M].冒广生补笺.北京:中华书局,1995.
[2] 曾枣庄等.全宋文(第123册)[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006.
[3] 宋元笔记小说大观(第2册)[M]宋元笔记小说大观(第2册)[M].李伟国校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.
[4] 何文焕. 历代诗话[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[5] 曾枣庄等.全宋文(第106册) [M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006.
[6] 郭绍虞. 宋诗话辑佚[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[7] 晁公武. 郡斋读书志校正(卷13)[M].孙猛校正.上海:上海古籍出版社,1990.602.
[8] 蔡镇楚. 中国诗话珍本丛书(第一册)[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.234.
[9] 曾枣庄等.全宋文(第180册)[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006.276.
[10] 陆游. 渭南文集校注(卷26)[M].马亚中,涂小马校注.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2015.165.
[11] 周子翼. 《后山诗话》考辨[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,40(4):150-157.
[12] 胡仔. 苕溪渔隐丛话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962. 216.
[13] 蔡正孙.诗林广记(后集卷10)[M].北京:中华书局,1982.333.
[14] 方回. 瀛奎律髓汇评[M].李庆甲集评点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2005.
[15] 郭绍虞. 清诗话续编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983. 603.
[16] 傅璇琮. 黄庭坚和江西诗派资料汇编(下册)[M].北京:中华书局,1978.
[17] 丁福保. 历代诗话续编[M].北京:中华书局,1983. 286.
[18] 王安石. 王安石全集[M].秦克,巩军标点.上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.35.
[19] 赵令畤.侯鲭录(卷7)[M].孔凡礼点校.北京:中华书局,2002.182.
[20] 黎靖德. 朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[21] 宋元笔记小说大观(第3册)[M]宋元笔记小说大观(第3册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.3018.
[22] 钱大昕. 十驾斋养新录(卷16)[M].杨勇军整理.上海:上海书店出版社,2011.322. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
