|
|
|
| Comparative Study of Social Capital in the Marketization of Public Service: Experiences and the Road Map |
| XU Hai-yan |
| Institute of Political Science, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,100732 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Popularizing PPP in public service and realizing marketization of public service supply is an effective way to facilitate access to finance for urbanization construction and achieve high-quality development. PPP in western developed countries is the product of the combination of free market economy, market dominated by private enterprises, and contract spirit. With the distinctive features of “marketization”, “privatization” and “contractualization” of public services, it has realized the unification of free market economy, complete rule of law system and strong national capacity. The marketization of China's public service supply is advanced in the process of reform and opening up, streamlining administration and delegating power, and building a service-oriented government. It is positive for building a service-oriented government, maintaining the dominant position of socialist public ownership, building China into a modern socialist country, but it is flawed in many ways: the government plays an absolute role; the participation of non-public capital is low; administrative departments overstep their authority; it requires more effective rules and regulations. There is no one-size-fits-all model for the marketization of public service provision. The experience of the countries in the third wave of democratic reform shows that the blind pursuit of a series of neoliberal models such as denationalization and privatization is harmful to the country. At present, China should push for the marketization of public service in the whole-process democracy, constantly optimize government functions, improve the rule of law, and give full play to the unique advantages of social capital in the marketization of public service provision.
|
|
Received: 04 April 2022
|
|
|
| Fund:研究和阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“推进中国特色社会主义政治制度自我完善和发展研究”（21ZDA124） |
|
|
|
[1] Michel Kerf, et al.Concessions for Infrastructure: A Guide to Their Design and Award[R].World Bank-Technical Paper NO.399,1998.
[2] Marc Holzer,Kathe Callahan.Government at Work:Best Practices and Model Programs[M].London: Sage Publications Inc,1998.
[3] (美)詹姆斯·奥康纳.国家的财政危机[M].沈国华译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2017.1-3.
[4] (美)戴维·奥斯本,特德·盖布勒.改革政府:企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M].上海市政协编译组,东方编译所编译.上海:上海译文出版社,1996.
[5] (美)查尔斯·沃尔夫.市场,还是政府—市场、政府失灵真相[M].陆俊,谢旭译.重庆:重庆出版社,2009.268.
[6] 周志忍. 当代国外行政改革比较研究[M].北京:国家行政学院出版社,1999.
[7] (美)埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道:集体行动制度的演进[M].余逊达,陈旭东译.上海:上海三联书店,2000.19.
[8] (美)E.S.萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].周志忍译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[9] Philip Kelly.公私合作(PPP)手册[EB/OL].https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33996/files/public-private-partnership-zh.pdf,2022-01-19.
[10] Philip Kelly.制定公私合作(PPP)法律:国际经验观察意见[R].亚洲开发银行东亚局系列工作报告NO.4,2016.
[11] 欧盟结构和投资基金(ESI).欧洲结构与投资基金新通用条例(CPR)[EB/OL].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent /EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1303&from=EN,2022-01-04.
[12] (美)B·盖伊·彼得斯.政府未来的治理模式[M].吴爱明等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.14.
[13] 弗朗索瓦-格扎维尔·梅里安,肖孝毛.治理问题与现代福利国家[J].国际社会科学杂志(中文版),1999,(1):59-68.
[14] 基础设施和公用事业特许经营管理办法[EB/OL].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/fzggwl/201504/W02019090549 4983771573.pdf,2022-03-25.
[15] 中共中央国务院关于新时代推进西部大开发形成新格局的指导意见[EB/OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1666935554979263751&wfr=spider&for=pc,2022-01-17.
[16] 曹珊. 政府和社会资本合作(PPP)项目法律实务[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.8.
[17] 支持联合国可持续发展目标,建立以人为本的PPP[EB/OL].https://unece.org/DAM/ceci/PPP/Standards/ECE_CECI_2019_06_cn.pdf,2022-03-25.
[18] (美)弗朗西斯·福山.国家构建——21世纪的国家治理与世界秩序[M].黄胜强,许铭原译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.
[19] 郭冠清. 新中国70年政府与市场关系演进的政治经济学分析[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(3):59-73.
[20] “PPP改革在中国”国际研讨会在世界银行成功召开[J].中国政府采购,2016,(10):10-11.
[21] 国务院新闻办公室.中国的民主[Z].2021-12-04. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
