|
|
|
| Local Logic of Relationship Generation and Regulation in China's Consultative Governance |
| WEI Chong-hui |
| College of Marxism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Western governance is a response to market failure and government failure. Its besetting sin results in chaos in governance. China needs to identify the universality and localization of governance, be critical of western ideology so as to rise above western governance, and formulate the Chinese style of governance. Consultative governance is to realize national governance with consultative democracy under the leadership of the CPC, and it is the Chinese style of governance. Governance should be based on social context and social structure, addressing the basic issues such as “right” and “power”, and local issues like “connection”. We should realize it is necessary to dissolve bourgeois rights, but our bottom line is to defend basic rights. Traditional Chinese culture provides the basic spiritual foundation for Chinese people to live a decent life and enjoy peaceful development. Seeking support from for power from traditional values and its institutionalization is feasible to prevent power alienation. The protection of rights and the operation of power shape the relationship in the consultative governance. The key to judging Chinese relationship lies in the role people play in a relationship and their position in the interaction between different roles. The most important social relations in modern Chinese society are intra-party relations and party-mass relations. To judge the relationship is to define people's roles, their role in intra-party relations and party-mass relations. To promote consultative governance and regulate relations, it is necessary to clearly define relationships and explore the reason deeply rooted in our society behind formalism and bureaucracy.
|
|
Received: 28 September 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中共中央文献研究室编.习近平关于社会主义政治建设论述摘编[C].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.20.
[2] 杨光斌.发现真实的“社会”——反思西方治理理论的本体论假设[J].中国社会科学评价,2019,(3):13-26+141.
[3] 邹诗鹏. 西方马克思主义研究的资源性意义及其反思[J].马克思主义理论学科研究,2019,(5):150-160.
[4] 习近平谈治国理政(第三卷)[M]习近平谈治国理政(第三卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2020. 29-30.
[5] 习近平.切实把思想统一到党的十八届三中全会精神上来[N].人民日报,2014-01-01(002).
[6] 王岩,魏崇辉.协商治理的中国逻辑[J].中国社会科学,2016,(7):26-45+204-205.
[7] 厉以宁. 资本主义的起源——比较经济史研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.38.
[8] 郁建兴. 马克思国家理论与现时代[M].上海:东方出版中心,2007.270.
[9] 马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M]马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 363.
[10] 马克思恩格斯文集(第四卷)[M]马克思恩格斯文集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.192.
[11] (英)A.J.M.米尔恩.人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学[M].夏勇,张志铭译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.118.
[12] 张灏. 重访五四——论五四思想的两歧性[J].开放时代,1999,(2):5-19.
[13] 习近平谈治国理政[M]习近平谈治国理政[M].北京:外文出版社,2014.428.
[14] (英)休谟.人性论[M].关文运译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.625.
[15] (英)哈特.法律的概念[M].许家馨,李冠宜译.北京:法律出版社,2006.182.
[16] 马克思恩格斯全集(第17卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1963.455.
[17] 救企业,要修枝剪叶,更要培根强茎[J].财新周刊,2020,(8):5.
[18] 谢遐龄. 非政府组织在中国——几个概念和发展前景[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2009,(3):13-19.
[19] 刘梦溪. 中国文化的张力:传统解故[M].北京:中信出版社,2019.105-122.
[20] 陈来. 中华文明的核心价值:国学流变与传统价值观[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015.51-57.
[21] (德)康德.法的形而上学原理——权利科学[M].沈叔平译.北京:商务印书馆,1991.39.
[22] (日)川岛武宜.现代化与法[M].王志安等译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.143.
[23] 黄光国,胡先缙等.人情与面子——中国人的权力游戏[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.1-12.
[24] 韩格理. 父权制、世袭制与孝道:中国与西欧的比较[M].台北:联经出版社,1990.81-82.
[25] 谢遐龄. 中国社会是伦理社会[M].上海:上海三联书店,2017.11.
[26] 中办印发《通知》 庆祝中国共产党成立100周年组织开展“永远跟党走”群众性主题宣传教育活动[N].人民日报,2021-04-12(001).
[27] 樊红敏,刘晓凤.模糊性治理:县域政府社会冲突治理运作逻辑[J].中国行政管理,2019,(10):81-87.
[28] 习近平. 之江新语[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013.38.
[29] 于泽远.中国学术打假能走多远?[DB/OL]. http://chinaxunxi.com/yd/8674.html,2020-12-02.
[30] 秋石. 全面深化改革是全面建成小康社会的必由之路——二论学习贯彻习近平总书记关于“四个全面”的战略布局[J].求是,2015,(10):10-13. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
