|
|
|
| Can Tax Reduction Effectively Promote Reshaping Economic Drivers? |
| TANG Yi-qiu |
| College of Big Data Application and Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Tax cut is not only an important part of proactive fiscal policy, but also a key measure to reduce cost in supply-side structure reform. Based on the data from 2002 to 2019, this paper analyzes the impact of major tax cuts on China's efforts of finding new economic growth drivers since our entry into the WTO. The findings are as follows.（1） VAT reduction aims to take multi-dimensional approaches to seek new economic growth drivers by means of rationalizing industrial structure. The corporate income tax reduction focuses on cultivating new growth drivers through optimizing innovation resource allocation and improving human capital structure, and there is a sequential logic between the two approaches. The corporate income tax reduction needs to first solve the problem of human capital mismatch to bring into play the power of innovation.（2） The incentive effect of new economic growth driver cultivation in northern China mainly comes from VAT reduction, while southern provinces mainly benefit from corporate income tax reduction.（3） VAT reduction is not conducive to the smooth shift of economic growth drivers during economic upheaval and slowdown, and its positive effect does not show until the reform period. The incentive effect on economy of corporate income tax reduction begins to show during economic slowdown, and actively cultivates new economic drivers for future development.（4） VAT reduction exerts a stronger driving force in regions with low fiscal self-sufficiency rate while the corporate income tax reduction is more effective in cultivating new growth drivers in regions with high fiscal self-sufficiency rate.（5） VAT and corporate income tax widen the gap in cultivating new growth drivers and increase difference across regions during economic slowdown, while in other economic periods they help achieve common development in the process of cultivating new economic drivers, which is in line with the fundamental requirements of collaborative development.
|
|
Received: 22 December 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郭庆旺.减税降费的潜在财政影响与风险防范[J].管理世界,2019,(6):1-10+194.
[2] 李戎,张凯强,吕冰洋.减税的经济增长效应研究[J].经济评论,2018,(4):3-17+30.
[3] 袁志刚. 经济增长动能转换与金融风险处置[J].经济学动态,2017,(11):4-15.
[4] 何代欣,张枫炎.中国减税降费的作用与关键环节[J].经济纵横,2019,(2):49-55.
[5] 张斌. 减税降费与中长期税制优化[J].国际税收,2019,(9):11-14.
[6] 龙如银,叶景,杨家慧.生产要素价格对产业结构优化影响的空间分异研究[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,(1):57-71.
[7] 欧阳志刚,彭方平.双轮驱动下中国经济增长的共同趋势与相依周期[J].经济研究,2018,(4):32-46.
[8] 柴士改,李金昌.中国经济发展新旧动能转换的监测研究[J].财经论丛,2020,(12):13-22.
[9] 白彦锋. 实质性减税降费与经济高质量发展[J].新疆财经,2020,(1):5-12.
[10] 禹春霞,满茹,邹志琴.基于熵权-TOPSIS的人工智能行业上市公司投资价值动态评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2020,(1):138-146.
[11] 邱东. 多指标综合评价中合成方法的系统分析[J].财经问题研究,1991,(6):39-42.
[12] 吕冰洋,马光荣,毛捷.分税与税率:从政府到企业[J].经济研究,2016,(7):13-28.
[13] 王小龙,方金金.财政“省直管县”改革与基层政府税收竞争[J].经济研究,2015,(11):79-93.
[14] 毛捷,吕冰洋,陈佩霞.分税的事实:度量中国县级财政分权的数据基础[J].经济学(季刊),2018,(2):499-526.
[15] 储德银,邵娇,迟淑娴.财政体制失衡抑制了地方政府税收努力吗?[J].经济研究,2019,(10):41-56.
[16] 詹新宇,刘洋.转移支付不确定性的经济发展质量效应及其影响机制[J].广东财经大学学报,2020,(5):4-21.
[17] 张瑞,王格宜,孙夏令.财政分权、产业结构与黄河流域高质量发展[J].经济问题,2020,(9):1-11.
[18] 刘智勇,李海峥,胡永远,李陈华.人力资本结构高级化与经济增长—兼论东中西部地区差距的形成和缩小[J].经济研究,2018,(3):50-63.
[19] 李震,杨永春.中国人力资本结构高级化格局演变及其空间分异机制[J].经济地理,2019,(10):104-111.
[20] 汤旖璆,刘琪,王佳龙.地方财政卫生投入与城市医疗卫生公共服务——基于“规模效应”与“质量效应”的双检验[J].财经论丛,2021,(7):36-47.
[21] 李静,楠玉.人力资本错配下的决策:优先创新驱动还是优先产业升级?[J].经济研究,2019,(8):152-166.
[22] 盛来运,郑鑫,周平,李拓.我国经济发展南北差距扩大的原因分析[J].管理世界,2018,(9):16-24.
[23] 许宪春,雷泽坤,窦园园,柳士昌.中国南北平衡发展差距研究——基于“中国平衡发展指数”的综合分析[J].中国工业经济,2021,(2):5-22.
[24] 杨明洪,巨栋,涂开均.“南北差距”:中国区域发展格局演化的事实、成因与政策响应[J].经济理论与经济管理,2021,(4):97-112.
[25] 易信,郭春丽.未来30年我国潜在增长率变化趋势及2049年发展水平预测[J].经济学家,2018,(2):36-45.
[26] 徐现祥,李书娟,王贤彬,毕青苗.中国经济增长目标的选择:以高质量发展终结“崩溃论”[J].世界经济,2018,(10):3-25.
[27] 孙文浩,张杰,康茜.减税有利于高新技术“僵尸企业”的创新吗?[J]统计研究,2021,(6):1-14. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
