魏晋六朝“韵”的内涵建构与审美分野

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (711 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Abstract: The exploration of the incompatibility of the connotation of “Yun” in Wei Jin and the Six Dynasties and its aesthetic distinction is necessary for the academic study of this neglected historical phenomenon. The purpose is to explore difference so as to present the complex feature of“Yun”. In the development of literary aesthetics, there is convergence and divergence in definition and use of the multiple meanings of “Yun”, and the latter is earlier than the former. Research shows that the currently available evidence which shows the character“Yun” originated from the documents of Pre-Qin and Han dynasties is either unreliable or doubtful, and that the interpretation of “Yun” (then interpretated as “harmony of sound (音和)”) did not appear until the Cao Wei period of the Three Kingdoms. People in Jin dynasty judged people by“Yun”(one's spirit and temperament) rather than appearance, and even worship the eccentrics who enjoyed personal freedom and spontaneity as very charismatic people (people with “da Yun”). Later, the painting theories and literary theories in the Southern Dynasty diverged in aesthetic ideas. The former “she sheng (舍声) （valued spirit above form）”, and the latter “ji sheng (即声)( attached importance to harmony of sound)”. “Yun” in Xie He's Gu Hua Pin Lu(Classified Record of Painters of Former Times, 古画品录) does not refer to the beauty of harmonious form but spirit resonance (or vivid representation). Its philosophical basis is not the concept of yuán qì (元气) ( an innate or prenatal qi) in the Han Dynasty but the argument about form and spirit of the metaphysics in Wei and Jin Dynasties, and it conforms to the theoretical system of Chinese aesthetics of vivid representation and freehand creation. Liu Xie mentioned “Yun” 33 times in his work Wen Xin Diao Long(Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature,文心雕龙). “Yun” in Liu's work is a concept of phonology meaning harmony of sound, and its philosophical basis is the Confucian doctrine of mean and harmony(“中和” 学说). Liu Xie's adherence to the original meaning of “Yun” echoed the academic fashion that emphasized the discussion of rhyme at that time. He ignored the new meaning of “Yun”, which is the limitation in understanding “Yun”. The metaphysical discussion of “rhyme” in literary theory did not make a breakthrough until the Song Dynasty, when “Yun” was interpreted as “rewarding and lasting impressions on audience” and literary theory and artistic theory finally converged in the understanding of “Yun”.

Key words： Wei Jin and the Six Dynasties Yun(rhyme,韵) Connotation Evolution Aesthetic Distinction Category Gu Hua Pin Lu (Ancient Painting Records,古画品录) Wen Xin Diao Long (Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature,文心雕龙)

Received: 10 November 2021

PACS:

I206.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Yu-qiang

Cite this article:

CHEN Yu-qiang. Connotation Evolution and Aesthetic Distinction of “Yun” in Wei Jin and the Six Dynasties[J]. , 2022, 39(2): 24-33.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V39/I2/24

[1] 谢赫. 古画品录[M].王伯敏标点注译.北京:人民美术出版社,1959.
[2] 范温. 潜溪诗眼[A].宋诗话辑佚[C].北京:中华书局,1980.
[3] 陈澧. 陈澧集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.146.
[4] 吕思勉. 先秦学术概论[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1985.101.
[5] 邵宏. 从“气韵”的生成检讨书论与文论的关系[A].艺术史研究(第1辑)[C].广州:中山大学出版社,1999.345.
[6] 阮元. 揅经室集[M].邓经元点校.北京:中华书局,1993. 1066.
[7] 韩刚.气韵:隋唐以前汉梵艺术精神之会通与融合[M].北京:人民出版社,2016.182.
[8] 薛尚功. 历代钟鼎彝器款识法帖[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2019.
[9] 王厚之. 钟鼎款识[M].北京:中华书局,1985.68.
[10] 罗运环. 楚王酓章镈铭文疏证[A].张光裕,黄德宽.古文字学论稿[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2008.
[11] 严可均. 全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文[Z].北京:中华书局,1958.
[12] 萧统. 文选[Z].李善注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
[13] 顾炎武. 顾炎武全集·音学五书[M].刘永翔校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2012.
[14] 颜之推. 颜氏家训集解[M].王利器集解.上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.285.
[15] 阎若璩. 尚书古文疏证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987. 499.
[16] 徐鼐. 读书杂释[M].北京:中华书局,1997.
[17] 徐复观. 中国艺术精神[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
[18] 顾野王. 原本玉篇残卷[M].北京:中华书局,1985.60.
[19] 许慎. 说文解字[M].徐铉校定.北京:中华书局,2013. 207.
[20] 欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.5393.
[21] 徐元诰. 国语集解[M].王树民,沈长云点校.北京:中华书局,2002.113.
[22] 房玄龄等. 晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.480.
[23] 张自烈. 正字通[M].清康熙二十四年吴源起清畏堂刊本.
[24] 黎翔凤. 管子校注[M].北京:中华书局,2004.106-107.
[25] 黄公绍. 古今韵会举要[A].熊忠举要.景印文渊阁四库全书(第238册)[C].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.702.
[26] 李学勤. 十三经注疏·毛诗正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.1450.
[27] 戴侗. 六书故[M].党怀兴,刘斌点校.北京:中华书局,2012.229.
[28] 刘勰. 文心雕龙义证[M].詹锳义证.上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
[29] 嵇康. 嵇康集校注[M].戴明扬校注.北京:人民文学出版社,1962.145.
[30] 刘邵. 人物志[M].梁满仓译注.北京:中华书局,2009.18.
[31] 张彦远. 历代名画记[M].俞剑华注释.上海:上海人民美术出版社,1964.
[32] 刘义庆. 世说新语笺疏[M].刘孝标注,余嘉锡笺疏.北京:中华书局,2007.
[33] 潘天寿. 听天阁画谈随笔[M].上海:上海人民美术出版社,1980.7.
[34] 汤用彤. 魏晋玄学论稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.4.
[35] 王弼. 老子道德经注校释[M].楼宇烈校释.北京:中华书局,2008.31.
[36] 程千帆. 古诗考索[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.316 .
[37] 张锡坤. “气韵”范畴考辨[J].中国社会科学,2000,(2):159.
[38] 陈玉强. 六朝“象外”说的语境及审美指向[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(2):66.
[39] 姚最. 续画品录[M].王伯敏标点注译.北京:人民美术出版社,1959.10-11.
[40] 夏文彦.图绘宝鉴(《续编》《续纂》二种)[M].肖世孟校注.太原:山西教育出版社,2017.1.
[41] 刘向. 列女传译注[M].张涛译注.济南:山东大学出版社,1990.75.
[42] 刘勰. 文心雕龙导读[M].李平,桑农导读.合肥:安徽师范大学出版社,2018.183.
[43] 萧子显. 南齐书[M].北京:中华书局,1972.907.
[44] 司空图. 司空表圣诗文集笺校[M].祖保泉,陶礼天笺校.合肥:安徽大学出版社,2002.193-194.
[45] 李廌. 济南集[A].景印文渊阁四库全书(第1115册)[C].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.817.