|
|
|
| People-centered Civil Enforcement Legislation: Its Logic, Value, and Key Components |
| HUANG Zhong-shun |
| Law School, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract XI Jin-ping thought on the rule of law is basically people-oriented. In civil enforcement legislation, we should stick to the people-oriented principle. Following this principle, the logical starting point of the people-centered civil enforcement legislation is the actual judicial protection of civil rights and interests. Its protection path is based on the fact that the abstract civil rights are confirmed to the specific civil rights and then to the actual realization of the civil rights. The essence of the legislation is transforming the static declaration of rights into the confirmation of real rights, and then ensuring the realization of rights by the state’s coercive force. Civil enforcement legislation should put the interest of the people in the procedure first. We should not only fight against departmentalism of practical departments, but also avoid enumerating foreign theories or cases to replace substantive argumentation. In civil enforcement legislation, we should not only properly adjust the relationship between creditors, debtors, interested parties, and outsiders, but also prevent those who are not accountable and are not properly protected from being involved in the enforcement procedure. Therefore, the people-centered civil enforcement legislation should be based on three major values: be efficient, humane and stability-oriented. The key to implementing the principle of civil compulsory execution legislation lies in following measures: adhering to the inequality principle in defining rights and liabilities; going beyond the supplementary principle of indirect enforcement in settling the money creditor’s claims; properly applying the above three values in the determination and change of the subject matter, and ensuring that the civil enforcement relief system can help outsiders who are not accountable out of troubles quickly.
|
|
Received: 12 November 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平. 加强党对全面依法治国的领导[J].求是,2019,(4):10.
[2] 本报评论员.维护和促进社会公平正义——论学习贯彻习近平总书记在中央全面依法治国工作会议上重要讲话[N].人民日报,2020-11-23(01).
[3] 习近平. 关于《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》的说明[J].理论学习,2014,(12):23.
[4] 习近平. 充分认识颁布实施民法典重大意义依法更好保障人民合法权益[J].求是,2020,(12):8.
[5] 王利明. 民法的人文关怀[J].中国社会科学,2011,(4):156.
[6] 黄忠顺. 论应诉管辖制度的解释模式[J].法商研究,2017,(3):92.
[7] 张卫平. 民法典的实施与民事诉讼法的协调和对接[J].中外法学,2020,(4):934.
[8] 陈家刚,曲政.人民性是习近平法治思想的鲜亮底色[N].北京日报,2021-01-11(09).
[9] 张文显. 习近平法治思想的理论体系[J].法制与社会发展,2021,(1):27.
[10] 黄忠顺. 民事执行机构改革的深度透析[J].法律科学,2016,(4):177.
[11] 黄忠顺. 审判权与执行权的分离与协作研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2019.182.
[12] 黄忠顺. 确定判决对案外第三人权益的损害及其救济原理[J].比较法研究,2021,(4):144.
[13] 吴光陆. 强制执行法(修订二版二刷)[M].台北:三民书局股份有限公司,2013.17.
[14] (日)竹下守夫.日本民事执行制度概况[J].白绿铉译.人民司法,2001,(6):53.
[15] 黄忠顺. 论直接执行与间接执行的关系——以金钱债权的间接执行为中心[J].东岳论丛,2020,(6):117-118.
[16] 陈荣宗. 强制执行法(第五版)[M].台北:三民书局股份有限公司,1995.61.
[17] (德)弗里茨·鲍尔,霍尔夫·施蒂尔纳,亚历山大·布伦斯.德国强制执行法(上册)[M].王洪亮,郝丽燕,李云琦译.北京:法律出版社,2019.69.
[18] 黄忠顺. 案外人排除强制执行请求的司法审查模式选择[J].法学,2020,(10):122-123.
[19] 肖建国. 中国民事强制执行法专题研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2020.31.
[20] 谭秋桂.善意文明执行理念的新发展[N].人民法院报,2020-06-11(02).
[21] 李步云,刘士平.论法律平等[J].湖南社会科学,2004,(5):34.
[22] 石文龙. 我国宪法平等条款的文本叙述与制度实现[J].政治与法律,2016,(6):71-72.
[23] 肖建国. 执行程序修订的价值共识与展望——兼评《民事诉讼法修正案》的相关条款[J].法律科学,2012,(6):186-197.
[24] 江必新. 强制执行法理论与实务[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2014.9.
[25] 李晓冬.强制执行中冻结扣划存款的法律适用[N].人民法院报,2008-03-21(06).
[26] 肖建国. 民事执行法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.6-7.
[27] 孔令章,梁平.民事间接强制执行制度比较研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(5):112.
[28] 谭秋桂. 民事执行法学(第二版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.12.
[29] 谭秋桂.我国民事执行的单独立法[N].中国社会科学报,2021-05-12(04).
[30] 黄忠顺. 金钱债权执行标的实体权属的审查程序[J].政法论丛,2021,(5):49.
[31] 黄忠顺. 为案外人异议制度辩护——以金钱债权执行为中心[J].民事程序法研究,2019,(2): 319-344. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 39 
