|
|
Penalties in Social Self-Governance, Corresponding Institutional Response and Regulation |
JIANG Du-du |
College of Credit Risk Management, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, 411105 |
|
|
Abstract Social self-governance is an important part of national governance system. In practice, social self-governance institutions often give penalties equivalent to administrative punishments to maintain order, but sometimes violate the basic rights of citizens. The administrative law should pay regard to this phenomenon. Social self-governance institutions introducing and giving penalties with attributes of administrative punishments is democratically legitimate and necessary for the inherent logic and administration of self-governance. However, the legitimacy of these penalties are questioned as they conflict with the Administrative Penalty Law of China. To address the long-standing penalties in social self-governance, we need to adjust the current Administrative Punishment Law in response to the rectification regulation of social self-governance. With the modernization of national governance system and the development of new administrative law, in the revision of the Administrative Penalty Law, we should defy tradition and make institutional response, allowing for conditional introduction of “administrative penalties” by social self-governance institutions, and regulating the three aspects of penalty establishment, penalty implementation and penalty relief, so as to build a social self-governance penalty system that gives due attention to both the autonomy of self-governance and the protection of civil rights.
|
Received: 17 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘龙飞,李春江. 盘石村的奇怪村规[J]. 村委主任,2011,(11):40-41. [2] 杨永吉. 《村民自治章程》应有处罚条款[J].中国民政,2001,(4):35. [3] 杨解君,蒋都都.《行政处罚法》面临的挑战与新发展——特别行政领域行政处罚应用的分析[J].行政法学研究,2017,(3):16-32. [4] 王丽娟. 体育法与行政处罚法的冲突及其协调[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2002,(4):68-70. [5] 冯之东,徐志强.特别权力关系理论在行业自治中的适用——以中国足协为研究个案[J].社科纵横,2007,(2):87-89. [6] 《行政法与行政诉讼法学》编写组.行政法与行政诉讼法学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2017.69. [7] (美)曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2014.2. [8] 于立深. 契约方法论——以公法哲学为背景的思考[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007. [9] 方洁. 社团罚则的设定与边界[J].法学,2005,(1):47-54. [10] 徐宗立. 论村规民约规定与实施处罚的法理正当性[J].法治研究,2010,(11):48-53. [11] (美)理查德·B.斯图尔特.美国行政法的重构[M].沈岿译.北京:商务印书馆,2016.6. [12] 张康之. 论新型社会治理模式中的社会自治[J].南京社会科学,2003,(9):39-44. [13] 俞可平. 更加重视社会自治[J].人民论坛,2011,(6):8-9. [14] 李克强.深化简政放权放管结合优化服务,推进行政体制改革转职能提效能[EB/OL].http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0523/c1001-28369865-3.html,2019-06-07. [15] 薛刚凌,王文英.社会自治规则探讨——兼论社会自治规则与国家法律的关系[J].行政法学研究,2006,(1):1-8. [16] 姜明安. 行政的“疆域”与行政法的功能[J].求是学刊,2002,(2):66-73. [17] 石佑启. 论协会处罚权的法律性质[J].法商研究,2017,(2):74-81. [18] (意)莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.比较法视野中的司法程序[M].徐昕,王奕译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.221. [19] 姜明安. 行政法与行政诉讼法(第六版 )[M].北京:高等教育出版,北京大学出版社,2015.85. [20] 季卫东. 法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993,(1):83-103. [21] 姚勤毅.上海男篮炮轰抢头条:中国篮协别欺人太甚[EB/OL].http://sh.sina.com.cn/news/t/2014-11-02/detail-icczmvum9528192.shtml,2019-10-30. [22] 谭九生. 论职业协会惩戒权的公法规制[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,(4):89-93. |
|
|
|