|
|
|
| The Possibility of Anti-fraud in Social Insurance: Choice of Anti-fraud Strategy on the Basis of Public Awareness |
| WANG Su-fen |
| Law School of Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110036 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Social insurance fraud poses a threat to the security of social funds. In order to realize the orderly operation of social insurance funds, we should further promote anti-fraud work. When designing the anti-fraud system in social insurance, we need to respect public opinion. Only in this way can the anti-fraud work be widely recognized and actively participated by the public. According to the results of the public awareness questionnaire on social insurance fraud, about 80% of the public have heard of social insurance fraud. In terms of general awareness, the public thinks that fraud in basic medical insurance is the most common. Social insurance fraud is more concentrated in payment and collection stage, and the main subjects of fraud are natural persons, social insurance agencies and their staff. In terms of the punishment of fraud, the public thinks that social insurance fraud should be punished, and generally does not agree with light punishment. In terms of public participation in anti-fraud, more than 80 percent respondents have no idea of local anti-fraud documents in social insurance. About 73 percent of respondents are willing to report social security fraud. Based on the above findings, the comprehensive application of strategies such as the formulation of an anti-fraud law, increasing the reward for the public to report fraud, improving whistle-blower protection system, further expanding the coverage of social insurance can effectively help realize the goal of anti-fraud in social insurance.
|
|
Received: 16 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何静. 理性对待刑事司法过程中的民意[J].中国刑事法杂志,2010,(6):68-73.
[2] 郑尚元. 社会保障法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2019.93.
[3] 《劳动与社会保障法学》编写组.劳动与社会保障法学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.210.
[4] Erik G.Luna.Welfare Fraud and the Fourth Amendment[J]. Pepperdine Law Review,1997,24(4):1235-1290.
[5] Hartley Dean,Margaret Melrose.Unravelling Citizenship: the Significance of Social Security Benefit Fraud[J]. Critical Social Policy,1996,16(3):3-31.
[6] Shiri Regev-Messalem.Claiming Citizenship:the Political Dimension of Welfare Fraud[J].Law and Social Inquiry,2013,38(4):993-1018.
[7] Ross Cranston.Legal Foundations of the Welfare State[M].London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1985.
[8] Kaaryn Gustafson.The Criminalization of Poverty[J].The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,2009,99(3):643-715.
[9] (美)罗伯特·达尔.论民主[M].李柏光,林猛译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.79.
[10] 王素芬. 社会保险反欺诈举报人制度研究[J].理论学刊,2019,(3):130—136.
[11] 娄宇. 平台经济从业者社会保险法律制度的构建[J].法学研究,2020,(2):190—208.
[12] 程金华. 迈向科学的法律实证研究[J].清华法学,2018,(4):149—166. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
